Suppr超能文献

全科医疗中的电话咨询:系统评价。

Telephone consultations for general practice: a systematic review.

机构信息

Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine, Griffith University, Nathan Campus - N78 1.11, 170 Kessels Rd, Nathan, Queensland, 4111, Australia.

Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan Campus - N78 1.11, 170 Kessels Rd, Nathan, Queensland, 4111, Australia.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 3;6(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0529-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of information technology, including internet- and telephone-based resources, is becoming an alternative and supporting method of providing many forms of services in a healthcare and health management setting. Telephone consultations provide a promising alternative and supporting service for face-to-face general practice care. The aim of this review is to utilize a systematic review to collate evidence on the use of telephone consultation as an alternative to face-to-face general practice visits.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform was performed using the search terms for the intervention (telephone consultation) and the comparator (general practice). Systematic reviews and randomized control trials that examined telephone consultation compared to normal face-to-face consultation in general practice were included in this review. Papers were reviewed, assessed for quality (Cochrane Collaboration's 'Risk of bias' tool) and data extracted and analysed.

RESULTS

Two systematic reviews and one RCT were identified and included in the analysis. The RCT (N = 388) was of patients requesting same-day appointments from two general practices and patients were randomized to a same-day face-to-face appointment or a telephone call back consultation. There was a reduction in the time spent on consultations in the telephone group (1.5 min (0.6 to 2.4)) and patients in the telephone arm had 0.2 (0 to 0.3) more follow-up consultations than the face-to-face group. One systematic review focused on telephone consultation and triage on healthcare use, and included one RCT and one other observational study that examined telephone consultations. The other systematic review focused on patient access and included one RCT and four observational studies that examined telephone consultations. Both systematic reviews provided narrative interpretations of the evidence and concluded that telephone consultations provided an appropriate alternative to telephone consultations and reduced practice work load.

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of high level evidence for telephone consultations in a GP setting; however, current evidence suggests that telephone consultations as an alternative to face-to-face general practice consultations offers an appropriate option in certain settings.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42015025225.

摘要

背景

信息技术的应用,包括基于互联网和电话的资源,正在成为医疗保健和健康管理领域提供多种服务的替代和支持方法。电话咨询为面对面的全科医疗护理提供了一种有前途的替代和支持服务。本综述的目的是利用系统评价来整理关于将电话咨询作为替代面对面全科就诊的证据。

方法

使用干预措施(电话咨询)和比较(一般实践)的搜索词,对 MEDLINE、CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆和国际临床试验注册平台进行了系统搜索。本综述包括比较电话咨询与一般实践中正常面对面咨询的系统评价和随机对照试验。审查了论文,评估了质量(Cochrane 协作的“偏倚风险”工具)并提取和分析了数据。

结果

确定并纳入了两项系统评价和一项 RCT 进行分析。RCT(N=388)是针对从两家全科诊所要求当天预约的患者进行的,患者被随机分配到当天的面对面预约或电话回拨咨询。电话组的咨询时间减少(1.5 分钟(0.6 至 2.4)),电话组的患者比面对面组多进行 0.2(0 至 0.3)次随访咨询。一项系统评价侧重于电话咨询和医疗保健使用的分诊,包括一项 RCT 和一项其他观察性研究,研究了电话咨询。另一项系统评价侧重于患者的就诊机会,包括一项 RCT 和四项观察性研究,研究了电话咨询。这两项系统评价都对证据进行了叙述性解释,并得出结论,电话咨询是电话咨询的一种合适替代方法,可以减轻实践工作负担。

结论

在全科医生环境中,电话咨询缺乏高级别的证据;然而,目前的证据表明,电话咨询作为面对面全科就诊的替代方案,在某些情况下是一种合适的选择。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO CRD42015025225。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cad7/5496327/57c91c96194b/13643_2017_529_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验