a Louisiana State University , Department of Psychology, Clinical Psychology , Baton Rouge , LA , USA.
Expert Rev Neurother. 2017 Sep;17(9):909-917. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2017.1351301. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
The changes to the diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) were met with much controversy by researchers, clinicians, and families of individuals with ASD. The goal of this paper is to review the literature on the impact of these changes. Areas covered: This paper reviews the major changes to diagnostic criteria from DSM-IV-TR to DSM-5. It emphasizes how these changes are hypothesized to impact prevalence rates, as well as trends in characteristics of individuals who would have met previous criteria for ASD but no longer qualify for a diagnosis under DSM-5. Policy issues such as access to services and research considerations are also briefly reviewed. Expert commentary: Researchers have found that the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for ASD may significantly impact which children receive diagnoses, which in turn affects access to services that address impairments characteristic of this disorder. Despite the fact that the DSM-5 has now been in use for four years, fewer recent studies were identified than was expected. Future research should continue to focus on the impact of changes in criteria, as well as on translational scientific advances across disciplines.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)诊断标准在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)中的变化引起了研究人员、临床医生和 ASD 患者家属的广泛争议。本文旨在综述这些变化的影响。
本文回顾了 DSM-IV-TR 到 DSM-5 诊断标准的主要变化。它强调了这些变化如何假设会影响患病率,以及符合 ASD 先前标准但不符合 DSM-5 诊断标准的个体的特征趋势。本文还简要回顾了服务准入和研究考虑等政策问题。
研究人员发现,DSM-5 自闭症谱系障碍诊断标准可能会显著影响哪些儿童接受诊断,而这反过来又会影响到获得解决该障碍特征性障碍的服务的机会。尽管 DSM-5 已经使用了四年,但发现的近期研究比预期的要少。未来的研究应继续关注标准变化的影响,以及跨学科的转化科学进展。