Suppr超能文献

优化德国全科医生、职业健康和康复医生之间的合作:一项定性研究。

Optimizing cooperation between general practitioners, occupational health and rehabilitation physicians in Germany: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research (Institut fuer Arbeitsmedizin, Sozialmedizin und Versorgungsforschung), University Hospital Tübingen, Wilhelmstrasse 27, 72074, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017 Nov;90(8):809-821. doi: 10.1007/s00420-017-1239-6. Epub 2017 Jul 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To achieve successful medical rehabilitation and timely return to work, general practitioners, occupational health and rehabilitation physicians need to cooperate effectively. This cooperation, however, can be hampered by organizational, interpersonal, and structural barriers. In this article, we present and discuss suggestions proposed by physicians and patients on how these barriers can be overcome.

METHODS

We conducted eight qualitative focus group discussions with general practitioners (GPs), occupational health physicians (OPs), rehabilitation physicians (RPs) and rehabilitation patients, which we analyzed with qualitative content analysis methods.

RESULTS

Room for improvement exists with regard to (1) regulation (e.g. formalized role and obligatory input of occupational physicians), (2) finance (e.g. financial incentives for physicians based on the quality of the application), (3) technology (e.g. communication by email), (4) organizational procedures (e.g. provision of workplace descriptions to RPs on a routine basis), (5) education and information (e.g. joint educational programs, measures to improve the image of OPs), and (6) promotion of cooperation (e.g. between OPs and GPs in regards to the application process).

CONCLUSIONS

Many suggestions are practical and could be implemented into the daily routine of physicians, while others demand multi-level, multi-stakeholder approaches. Our findings are supported by numerous international studies (especially from Western Europe). Future quantitative research could assess the relative weight of these findings. Feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed suggestions should be tested in controlled interventional studies.

摘要

目的

为了实现成功的医疗康复和及时重返工作岗位,全科医生、职业健康和康复医生需要有效合作。然而,这种合作可能会受到组织、人际和结构障碍的阻碍。在本文中,我们提出并讨论了医生和患者提出的克服这些障碍的建议。

方法

我们进行了八次定性焦点小组讨论,参与者包括全科医生(GP)、职业健康医生(OP)、康复医生(RP)和康复患者,我们采用定性内容分析方法对讨论结果进行了分析。

结果

在以下方面存在改进的空间:(1)监管(例如,职业医生的正式角色和强制性投入);(2)财务(例如,根据申请质量为医生提供财务激励);(3)技术(例如,通过电子邮件进行沟通);(4)组织程序(例如,定期向 RP 提供工作场所描述);(5)教育和信息(例如,联合教育计划,改善 OP 形象的措施);(6)合作促进(例如,OP 和 GP 在申请流程方面的合作)。

结论

许多建议是切实可行的,可以纳入医生的日常工作中,而其他建议则需要多层次、多利益相关者的方法。我们的发现得到了许多国际研究(尤其是来自西欧的研究)的支持。未来的定量研究可以评估这些发现的相对重要性。应在对照干预研究中测试所提出建议的可行性和有效性。

相似文献

1
Optimizing cooperation between general practitioners, occupational health and rehabilitation physicians in Germany: a qualitative study.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017 Nov;90(8):809-821. doi: 10.1007/s00420-017-1239-6. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
4
General practitioners' and occupational health physicians' views on their cooperation: a cross-sectional postal survey.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016 Apr;89(3):449-59. doi: 10.1007/s00420-015-1084-4. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
6
Cooperation between general practitioners and occupational health physicians in Germany: how can it be optimised? A qualitative study.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014 Feb;87(2):137-46. doi: 10.1007/s00420-013-0845-1. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
9
Interprofessional communication between community pharmacists and general practitioners: a qualitative study.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Jun;39(3):495-506. doi: 10.1007/s11096-017-0450-6. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
10
How do Dutch GPs address work-related problems? A focus group study.
Eur J Gen Pract. 2016 Sep;22(3):169-75. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2016.1177507. Epub 2016 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
General practitioners' involvement in inpatient medical rehabilitation in Germany: a scoping review.
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Sep 18;26(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-03007-5.
3
Workplace Health Promotion Embedded in Medical Surveillance: The Italian Way to Total Worker Health Program.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 18;20(4):3659. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043659.
4
Healing of Unilateral Maxillary Sinusitis by Endodontic and Periodontal Treatment of Maxillary Teeth.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 18;58(9):1302. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091302.
6
Primary Care Physicians' Learning Needs in Returning Ill or Injured Workers to Work. A Scoping Review.
J Occup Rehabil. 2022 Dec;32(4):591-619. doi: 10.1007/s10926-022-10043-w. Epub 2022 May 5.
7
Addressing future work ability of employees in GP consultations: results of a cross-sectional study.
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2021 Mar 22;16(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12995-021-00299-y.
9
Cancer-related cognitive problems at work: experiences of survivors and professionals.
J Cancer Surviv. 2020 Apr;14(2):168-178. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00830-5. Epub 2019 Nov 25.

本文引用的文献

3
Effects of graded return-to-work: a propensity-score-matched analysis.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 Jul 1;42(4):273-9. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3562. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
4
Information Transfer at Hospital Discharge: A Systematic Review.
J Patient Saf. 2020 Mar;16(1):e25-e33. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000248.
5
Workplace interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leave.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 5;2015(10):CD006955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006955.pub3.
6
General practitioners' and occupational health physicians' views on their cooperation: a cross-sectional postal survey.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016 Apr;89(3):449-59. doi: 10.1007/s00420-015-1084-4. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
8
Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 Sep;42(5):533-44. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
10
Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (update).
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD002213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002213.pub3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验