Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research (Institut fuer Arbeitsmedizin, Sozialmedizin und Versorgungsforschung), University Hospital Tübingen, Wilhelmstrasse 27, 72074, Tübingen, Germany.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017 Nov;90(8):809-821. doi: 10.1007/s00420-017-1239-6. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
To achieve successful medical rehabilitation and timely return to work, general practitioners, occupational health and rehabilitation physicians need to cooperate effectively. This cooperation, however, can be hampered by organizational, interpersonal, and structural barriers. In this article, we present and discuss suggestions proposed by physicians and patients on how these barriers can be overcome.
We conducted eight qualitative focus group discussions with general practitioners (GPs), occupational health physicians (OPs), rehabilitation physicians (RPs) and rehabilitation patients, which we analyzed with qualitative content analysis methods.
Room for improvement exists with regard to (1) regulation (e.g. formalized role and obligatory input of occupational physicians), (2) finance (e.g. financial incentives for physicians based on the quality of the application), (3) technology (e.g. communication by email), (4) organizational procedures (e.g. provision of workplace descriptions to RPs on a routine basis), (5) education and information (e.g. joint educational programs, measures to improve the image of OPs), and (6) promotion of cooperation (e.g. between OPs and GPs in regards to the application process).
Many suggestions are practical and could be implemented into the daily routine of physicians, while others demand multi-level, multi-stakeholder approaches. Our findings are supported by numerous international studies (especially from Western Europe). Future quantitative research could assess the relative weight of these findings. Feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed suggestions should be tested in controlled interventional studies.
为了实现成功的医疗康复和及时重返工作岗位,全科医生、职业健康和康复医生需要有效合作。然而,这种合作可能会受到组织、人际和结构障碍的阻碍。在本文中,我们提出并讨论了医生和患者提出的克服这些障碍的建议。
我们进行了八次定性焦点小组讨论,参与者包括全科医生(GP)、职业健康医生(OP)、康复医生(RP)和康复患者,我们采用定性内容分析方法对讨论结果进行了分析。
在以下方面存在改进的空间:(1)监管(例如,职业医生的正式角色和强制性投入);(2)财务(例如,根据申请质量为医生提供财务激励);(3)技术(例如,通过电子邮件进行沟通);(4)组织程序(例如,定期向 RP 提供工作场所描述);(5)教育和信息(例如,联合教育计划,改善 OP 形象的措施);(6)合作促进(例如,OP 和 GP 在申请流程方面的合作)。
许多建议是切实可行的,可以纳入医生的日常工作中,而其他建议则需要多层次、多利益相关者的方法。我们的发现得到了许多国际研究(尤其是来自西欧的研究)的支持。未来的定量研究可以评估这些发现的相对重要性。应在对照干预研究中测试所提出建议的可行性和有效性。