Suppr超能文献

德国全科医生、职业健康医生和康复医生之间的合作:合作存在哪些问题和障碍?一项定性研究。

Cooperation between general practitioners, occupational health physicians, and rehabilitation physicians in Germany: what are problems and barriers to cooperation? A qualitative study.

作者信息

Stratil Jan M, Rieger Monika A, Völter-Mahlknecht Susanne

机构信息

Institute for Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Health Services Research (Institut fuer Arbeitsmedizin, Sozialmedizin und Versorgungsforschung), University Hospital Tuebingen, Wilhelmstrasse 27, 72074, Tuebingen, Germany.

出版信息

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017 Aug;90(6):481-490. doi: 10.1007/s00420-017-1210-6. Epub 2017 Mar 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

General practitioners (GPs), occupational health physicians (OPs), and rehabilitation physicians (RPs) fulfill different functions in the rehabilitation process, which need to be interlinked effectively to achieve a successful medical and occupational rehabilitation. In Germany, this cooperation at the interfaces is often suboptimal. The aim of this study was to identify and discuss perceived barriers to cooperation between GPs, OPs, and RPs.

METHODS

We used a qualitative study design with eight focus group discussions (FGD) with GPs, OPs, RPs, and rehabilitants. Two FGDs per expert group with 4-10 participants were conducted. The transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

A number of obstacles to cooperation were reported by the participants, including (1) organizational (e.g., missing contact details, low reachability, schedule restrictions), (2) interpersonal (e.g., rehabilitants level of trust in OPs, low perceived need to cooperate with OPs, low motivation to cooperate), and (3) structural barriers (e.g., data privacy regulations, regulations concerning rehabilitation reports).

CONCLUSION

The present data agree with study results from other countries, which addressed interfaces in the rehabilitation process. While some barriers could be overcome by the participants themselves, a multi-level stakeholder approach might be necessary. Future quantitative research is required to assess the relative weight of the findings.

摘要

目的

全科医生(GPs)、职业健康医生(OPs)和康复医生(RPs)在康复过程中履行不同职能,需要有效联动以实现成功的医学和职业康复。在德国,这些领域之间的合作往往不尽人意。本研究旨在识别并讨论全科医生、职业健康医生和康复医生之间合作中存在的可感知障碍。

方法

我们采用定性研究设计,与全科医生、职业健康医生、康复医生及康复患者进行了八次焦点小组讨论(FGD)。每个专家组进行两次焦点小组讨论,每次讨论有4至10名参与者。对访谈记录采用定性内容分析法进行分析。

结果

参与者报告了许多合作障碍,包括(1)组织方面的(如缺少联系方式、难以联系上、日程安排受限),(2)人际方面的(如康复患者对职业健康医生的信任程度、认为与职业健康医生合作的必要性低、合作积极性低),以及(3)结构性障碍(如数据隐私法规、康复报告相关规定)。

结论

目前的数据与其他国家关于康复过程中各领域的研究结果一致。虽然一些障碍参与者自身可以克服,但可能需要采取多层次的利益相关者方法。未来需要进行定量研究以评估这些研究结果的相对重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb9c/5500677/fc4d518e3bd1/420_2017_1210_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验