Center for Infertility and Reproductive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, FAS Center for Systems Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 Oct;34(10):1261-1269. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-0978-3. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
The aim of this study was to determine if zona pellucida thickness variation (ZPTV) is associated with implantation and if this relationship changes with use of assisted hatching (AH).
Day 3 embryos from single or double embryo transfers (DETs) performed between 2014 and 2016 were included. ZPTV was assessed by examining photographs taken before transfer using an automated image processing platform to segment the zona pellucida (ZP) with an active contour technique. One hundred points were obtained of ZP thickness (ZPT) of each embryo to calculate ZPTV ([maximum ZPT-mean ZPT]/mean ZPT). Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of implantation by tertile of ZPTV. Maternal age and AH were adjusted for a priori. Other cycle and embryo characteristics were adjusted for if they altered the continuous effect estimate by >10%.
There was no statistically significant association between ZPTV and implantation across tertiles although embryos with greater ZPTV showed a trend of decreased implantation (Tertile 2 (T2) versus Tertile 1 (T1), OR = 0.80, CI = 0.50-1.28; Tertile 3 (T3) versus Tertile 1 (T3), OR = 0.75, CI = 0.47-1.20). While similar nonsignificant trends for the association between ZPTV and implantation were observed across tertiles after stratification of embryos hatched or not, embryos with the greatest ZPTV had slightly higher odds for implantation when AH was utilized (T3 vs. T1: with AH, OR = 0.89, CI = 0.49-1.62; without AH, OR = 0.61, 0.29-1.27).
ZPTV was not associated with implantation after day 3 transfer. This finding did not vary by use of AH.
本研究旨在确定透明带厚度变化(ZPTV)是否与着床有关,以及这种关系是否因辅助孵化(AH)的使用而改变。
纳入 2014 年至 2016 年期间进行的单胚胎或双胚胎移植(DET)的第 3 天胚胎。使用自动图像处理平台检查移植前拍摄的照片,通过主动轮廓技术对透明带(ZP)进行分割,以评估 ZPTV。获取每个胚胎的 100 个 ZP 厚度(ZPT)点来计算 ZPTV([最大 ZPT-平均 ZPT]/平均 ZPT)。使用逻辑回归计算 ZPTV 三分位的着床比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。调整了母体年龄和 AH 进行了预先调整。如果其他周期和胚胎特征改变了连续效应估计值> 10%,则对其进行了调整。
尽管 ZPTV 较大的胚胎着床率呈下降趋势,但 ZPTV 与种植之间在三分位上没有统计学显著关联(T2 与 T1 相比,OR=0.80,CI=0.50-1.28;T3 与 T1 相比,OR=0.75,CI=0.47-1.20)。虽然在分层孵育或未孵育的胚胎中,ZPTV 与着床之间的关联也存在相似的非显著趋势,但当使用 AH 时,ZPTV 最大的胚胎着床率略高(T3 与 T1:有 AH,OR=0.89,CI=0.49-1.62;无 AH,OR=0.61,0.29-1.27)。
第 3 天转移后,ZPTV 与着床无关。这一发现不因 AH 的使用而有所不同。