• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Effect of Trust on Gaze-Mediated Attentional Orienting.信任对目光介导的注意力定向的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 15;11:1554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01554. eCollection 2020.
2
Neural evidence for the impact of facial trustworthiness on object processing in a gaze-cueing task in 7-month-old infants.7 个月大婴儿在注视线索任务中,面部可信度对面孔加工影响的神经证据。
Soc Neurosci. 2020 Feb;15(1):74-82. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2019.1651764. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
3
The role of emotion in learning trustworthiness from eye-gaze: Evidence from facial electromyography.情绪在通过眼神注视学习可信度方面的作用:来自面部肌电图的证据。
Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jan-Oct;7(1-4):82-102. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1085374. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
4
The interplay between gaze cueing and facial trait impressions.注视提示与面部特征印象的相互作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Sep;74(9):1642-1655. doi: 10.1177/17470218211007791. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
5
Examining the durability of incidentally learned trust from gaze cues.审视从目光线索中偶然习得的信任的持久性。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Oct;70(10):2060-2075. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1220609. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
6
The influence of joint attention and partner trustworthiness on cross-modal sensory cueing.共同注意和伙伴可信度对跨模态感官提示的影响。
Cortex. 2019 Oct;119:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
7
What we observe is biased by what other people tell us: beliefs about the reliability of gaze behavior modulate attentional orienting to gaze cues.我们所观察到的会受到他人告知我们的信息的影响:关于注视行为可靠性的信念会调节对注视线索的注意力定向。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 10;9(4):e94529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094529. eCollection 2014.
8
The effect of arousal and eye gaze direction on trust evaluations of stranger's faces: A potential pathway to paranoid thinking.唤醒和目光注视方向对陌生人面孔信任评估的影响:偏执思维的潜在途径。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;60:29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
9
Pre-exposure to Ambiguous Faces Modulates Top-Down Control of Attentional Orienting to Counterpredictive Gaze Cues.预先暴露于模糊面孔会调节自上而下对注意力定向的控制,以应对反预测性注视线索。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 9;11:2234. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02234. eCollection 2020.
10
Automatic attentional orienting to other people's gaze in schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者对他人目光的自动注意定向
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Aug;70(8):1549-1558. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1192658. Epub 2016 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Not to follow because of distrust: perceived trust modulates the gaze cueing effect.因不信任而不跟随:感知到的信任调节注视线索效应。
Psychol Res. 2024 Nov;88(8):2195-2210. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02000-4. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
2
I prefer what you can see: The role of visual perspective-taking on the gaze-liking effect.我更倾向于你所能看到的:视觉视角采择在凝视-喜爱效应中的作用。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 16;10(8):e29615. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29615. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.
3
Standing out from the crowd: Both cue numerosity and social information affect attention in multi-agent contexts.脱颖而出:线索数量和社会信息在多主体情境中均影响注意。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Oct;74(10):1737-1746. doi: 10.1177/17470218211013028. Epub 2021 Apr 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Social modulators of gaze-mediated orienting of attention: A review.注视介导的注意定向的社会调节因素:综述
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Oct;27(5):833-855. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01730-x.
2
Living in a Disadvantaged Neighborhood Affects Neural Processing of Facial Trustworthiness.生活在弱势社区会影响对面部可信度的神经处理。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 26;11:409. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00409. eCollection 2020.
3
Appearance-based trust processing in schizophrenia.基于外貌的信任处理在精神分裂症中的研究。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2020 Jun;59(2):139-153. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12234. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
4
Neural evidence for the impact of facial trustworthiness on object processing in a gaze-cueing task in 7-month-old infants.7 个月大婴儿在注视线索任务中,面部可信度对面孔加工影响的神经证据。
Soc Neurosci. 2020 Feb;15(1):74-82. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2019.1651764. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
5
Investigating the formation and consolidation of incidentally learned trust.探究偶然习得信任的形成与巩固。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Apr;46(4):684-698. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000752. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
6
Attention to faces and gaze-following in social anxiety: preliminary evidence from a naturalistic eye-tracking investigation.对社交焦虑中面孔和目光追随的关注:自然眼动追踪研究的初步证据。
Cogn Emot. 2019 Aug;33(5):931-942. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1519497. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
7
Implicit and Explicit Motivational Tendencies to Faces Varying in Trustworthiness and Dominance in Men.男性对不同可信度和支配性面孔的内隐和外显动机倾向。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Jan 23;12:8. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00008. eCollection 2018.
8
The Gaze-Cueing Effect in the United States and Japan: Influence of Cultural Differences in Cognitive Strategies on Control of Attention.美国和日本的注视线索效应:认知策略中的文化差异对注意力控制的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 15;8:2343. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02343. eCollection 2017.
9
A Collaborator's Reputation Can Bias Decisions and Anxiety under Uncertainty.协作者的声誉可能会在不确定的情况下影响决策和焦虑。
J Neurosci. 2018 Feb 28;38(9):2262-2269. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2337-17.2018. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
10
Abnormalities in early visual processes are linked to hypersociability and atypical evaluation of facial trustworthiness: An ERP study with Williams syndrome.早期视觉处理过程中的异常与过度社交及对面部可信度的非典型评估有关:一项针对威廉姆斯综合征的事件相关电位研究。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Oct;17(5):1002-1017. doi: 10.3758/s13415-017-0528-6.

信任对目光介导的注意力定向的影响。

The Effect of Trust on Gaze-Mediated Attentional Orienting.

作者信息

Barbato Mariapaola, Almulla Aisha A, Marotta Andrea

机构信息

Cognition and Neuroscience Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Zayed University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Department of Experimental Psychology and Physiology of Behaviour, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 15;11:1554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01554. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01554
PMID:32765355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7381121/
Abstract

The last two decades have witnessed growing interest in the study of social cognition and its multiple facets, including trust. Interpersonal trust is generally understood as the belief that others are not likely to harm you. When meeting strangers, judgments of trustworthiness are mostly based on fast evaluation of facial appearance, unless information about past behavior is available. In the past decade, studies have tried to understand the complex relationship between trust and gaze-cueing of attention (GCA) (i.e., attentional orienting following another person's gaze). This review will focus on the studies that used a gaze-cueing paradigm to explore this relationship. While the predictivity of the gaze-cue seems to consistently influence trustworthiness judgments, the impact of trust on gaze-cueing is less clear. Four studies found enhanced gaze-cueing effects with trustworthy faces; one found stronger effects of gaze-cueing with faces associated with undesirable behavior, but only when the observer's personal evaluations were taken into account. Four studies did not observe an effect of trust on gaze-cueing. Overall, studies have highlighted the complexity of this relationship, suggesting that multiple factors (including age, gender, the characteristics of the observer, and whether or not a threat is perceived) are likely to intervene in the interplay between trust and gaze-triggered attentional orienting. After discussing results in the context of existing theories of gaze-cueing and trust, we conclude that further investigation is needed to better understand this relationship and the contribution of social factors to attentional shifts guided by gaze.

摘要

在过去二十年中,社会认知及其多个方面(包括信任)的研究兴趣日益浓厚。人际信任通常被理解为相信他人不太可能伤害自己。遇到陌生人时,对他人是否值得信任的判断大多基于对面部外观的快速评估,除非有关于其过去行为的信息。在过去十年中,研究试图理解信任与注意力的目光提示(GCA)(即跟随他人目光的注意力定向)之间的复杂关系。本综述将聚焦于使用目光提示范式来探究这种关系的研究。虽然目光提示的预测性似乎始终会影响对他人是否值得信任的判断,但信任对目光提示的影响则不太明确。四项研究发现,面对值得信任的面孔时,目光提示效应增强;一项研究发现,面对与不良行为相关的面孔时,目光提示效应更强,但前提是要考虑观察者的个人评价。四项研究未观察到信任对目光提示有影响。总体而言,研究凸显了这种关系的复杂性,表明多种因素(包括年龄、性别、观察者的特征以及是否察觉到威胁)可能会干预信任与目光触发的注意力定向之间的相互作用。在结合现有的目光提示和信任理论对研究结果进行讨论之后,我们得出结论,需要进一步开展研究,以更好地理解这种关系以及社会因素对由目光引导的注意力转移的作用。