Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington, P. O. Box 600, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Sep;47(9):2899-2910. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3214-1.
An intervention has social validity to the extent that it is socially acceptable to participants and stakeholders. This pilot convergent mixed methods study evaluated parents' perceptions of the social validity of the Early Start Denver Model (ESDM), a naturalistic behavioral intervention for children with autism. It focused on whether the parents viewed (a) the ESDM goals as appropriate for their children, (b) the intervention procedures as acceptable and appropriate, and (c) whether changes in their children's behavior was practically significant. Parents of four children who participated in the ESDM completed the TARF-R questionnaire and participated in a semi-structured interview. Both data sets indicated that parents rated their experiences with the ESDM positively and rated it as socially-valid. The findings indicated that what was implemented in the intervention is complemented by how it was implemented and by whom.
一项干预措施在多大程度上具有社会有效性,取决于它在参与者和利益相关者中是否被社会所接受。这项初步的收敛混合方法研究评估了家长对早期丹佛模式(ESDM)的社会有效性的看法,ESDM 是一种针对自闭症儿童的自然行为干预方法。它主要关注父母是否认为:(a) ESDM 的目标适合他们的孩子;(b) 干预程序是否可接受和适当;以及 (c) 他们孩子的行为变化是否具有实际意义。参加 ESDM 的四名儿童的家长完成了 TARF-R 问卷,并参加了半结构化访谈。这两个数据集都表明,父母对他们的 ESDM 体验评价积极,并认为其具有社会有效性。研究结果表明,干预中实施的内容与实施方式和实施者有关。