Ercumen Ayse, Pickering Amy J, Kwong Laura H, Arnold Benjamin F, Parvez Sarker Masud, Alam Mahfuja, Sen Debashis, Islam Sharmin, Kullmann Craig, Chase Claire, Ahmed Rokeya, Unicomb Leanne, Luby Stephen P, Colford John M
School of Public Health, University of California , Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University , Medford, Massachusetts 02153, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Aug 1;51(15):8725-8734. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01710. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
Fecal-oral pathogens are transmitted through complex, environmentally mediated pathways. Sanitation interventions that isolate human feces from the environment may reduce transmission but have shown limited impact on environmental contamination. We conducted a study in rural Bangladesh to (1) quantify domestic fecal contamination in settings with high on-site sanitation coverage; (2) determine how domestic animals affect fecal contamination; and (3) assess how each environmental pathway affects others. We collected water, hand rinse, food, soil, and fly samples from 608 households. We analyzed samples with IDEXX Quantitray for the most probable number (MPN) of E. coli. We detected E. coli in source water (25%), stored water (77%), child hands (43%), food (58%), flies (50%), ponds (97%), and soil (95%). Soil had >120 000 mean MPN E. coli per gram. In compounds with vs without animals, E. coli was higher by 0.54 log in soil, 0.40 log in stored water and 0.61 log in food (p < 0.05). E. coli in stored water and food increased with increasing E. coli in soil, ponds, source water and hands. We provide empirical evidence of fecal transmission in the domestic environment despite on-site sanitation. Animal feces contribute to fecal contamination, and fecal indicator bacteria do not strictly indicate human fecal contamination when animals are present.
粪-口传播病原体通过复杂的、由环境介导的途径传播。将人类粪便与环境隔离开来的卫生干预措施可能会减少传播,但对环境污染的影响有限。我们在孟加拉国农村进行了一项研究,以(1)量化现场卫生设施覆盖率高的地区的家庭粪便污染情况;(2)确定家畜如何影响粪便污染;以及(3)评估每种环境途径如何相互影响。我们从608户家庭收集了水、洗手冲洗液、食物、土壤和苍蝇样本。我们使用IDEXX Quantitray分析样本,以确定大肠杆菌的最可能数(MPN)。我们在水源水(25%)、储存水(77%)、儿童手部(43%)、食物(58%)、苍蝇(50%)、池塘(97%)和土壤(95%)中检测到了大肠杆菌。土壤中每克大肠杆菌的平均MPN>120000。在有动物和没有动物的院子里,土壤中大肠杆菌含量高0.54个对数,储存水中高0.40个对数,食物中高0.61个对数(p<0.05)。储存水和食物中的大肠杆菌随着土壤、池塘、水源水和手部大肠杆菌含量的增加而增加。我们提供了尽管有现场卫生设施但家庭环境中仍存在粪便传播的实证证据。动物粪便会导致粪便污染,并且当有动物存在时,粪便指示菌并不严格指示人类粪便污染。