Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA; F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, USA.
Center for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research, Kennedy Krieger Institute, USA; Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, USA.
Neuroimage. 2017 Sep;158:155-175. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
Due to the dynamic, condition-dependent nature of brain activity, interest in estimating rapid functional connectivity (FC) changes that occur during resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) has recently soared. However, studying dynamic FC is methodologically challenging, due to the low signal-to-noise ratio of the blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal in fMRI and the massive number of data points generated during the analysis. Thus, it is important to establish methods and summary measures that maximize reliability and the utility of dynamic FC to provide insight into brain function. In this study, we investigated the reliability of dynamic FC summary measures derived using three commonly used estimation methods - sliding window (SW), tapered sliding window (TSW), and dynamic conditional correlations (DCC) methods. We applied each of these techniques to two publicly available rs-fMRI test-retest data sets - the Multi-Modal MRI Reproducibility Resource (Kirby Data) and the Human Connectome Project (HCP Data). The reliability of two categories of dynamic FC summary measures were assessed, specifically basic summary statistics of the dynamic correlations and summary measures derived from recurring whole-brain patterns of FC ("brain states"). The results provide evidence that dynamic correlations are reliably detected in both test-retest data sets, and the DCC method outperforms SW methods in terms of the reliability of summary statistics. However, across all estimation methods, reliability of the brain state-derived measures was low. Notably, the results also show that the DCC-derived dynamic correlation variances are significantly more reliable than those derived using the non-parametric estimation methods. This is important, as the fluctuations of dynamic FC (i.e., its variance) has a strong potential to provide summary measures that can be used to find meaningful individual differences in dynamic FC. We therefore conclude that utilizing the variance of the dynamic connectivity is an important component in any dynamic FC-derived summary measure.
由于大脑活动具有动态、依赖条件的特性,因此最近人们对估计静息态功能磁共振成像 (rs-fMRI) 期间发生的快速功能连接 (FC) 变化产生了浓厚的兴趣。然而,由于 fMRI 中血氧水平依赖 (BOLD) 信号的信噪比低,以及在分析过程中产生的大量数据点,因此研究动态 FC 在方法上具有挑战性。因此,建立最大限度地提高动态 FC 的可靠性和实用性的方法和汇总指标对于深入了解大脑功能非常重要。在这项研究中,我们研究了使用三种常用估计方法(滑动窗口 (SW)、锥形滑动窗口 (TSW) 和动态条件相关 (DCC) 方法)得出的动态 FC 汇总指标的可靠性。我们将这些技术中的每一种都应用于两个公开可用的 rs-fMRI 测试-再测试数据集——多模态 MRI 可重复性资源 (Kirby 数据) 和人类连接组计划 (HCP 数据)。评估了两类动态 FC 汇总指标的可靠性,具体为动态相关性的基本汇总统计数据和源自 FC 重复全脑模式的汇总指标(“大脑状态”)。结果表明,动态相关性在两个测试-再测试数据集均可靠检测,并且 DCC 方法在汇总统计数据的可靠性方面优于 SW 方法。然而,在所有估计方法中,源自大脑状态的测量指标的可靠性都很低。值得注意的是,结果还表明,DCC 衍生的动态相关系数方差明显比非参数估计方法衍生的更可靠。这很重要,因为动态 FC 的波动(即其方差)具有提供可用于发现动态 FC 中有意义的个体差异的汇总指标的强大潜力。因此,我们得出结论,利用动态连通性的方差是任何动态 FC 衍生汇总指标的重要组成部分。