Juntakarn Chantip, Prasartritha Thavat, Petrakard Prapoj
Department of Academic Support, Lerdsin Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Institute of Orthopaedics, Lerdsin Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2017 Jun 30;10(2):3-8. doi: 10.3822/ijtmb.v10i2.350. eCollection 2017 Jun.
Non-specific low back pain (LBP) is a common health problem resulting from many risk factors and human behaviors. Some of these may interact synergistically and have been implicated in the cause of low back pain. Massage both traditional Thai massage and joint mobilization as a common practice has been shown to be effective for some subgroup of nonspecific LBP patients.
The trial compared the effectiveness between traditional Thai massage and joint mobilization for treating nonspecific LBP. Some associated factors were included. The study was conducted at the orthopedic outpatient department, Lerdsin General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Prospective, randomized study was developed without control group. The required sample size was estimated based on previous comparative studies for effectiveness between techniques. Two primary outcome measures were a 0 to 10 visual analog scale (VAS) of pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcome measures were satisfaction of patients and adverse effects of the treatment. The "intention to treat" (ITT) and per protocol approach were used to compare the significance of the difference between treatment groups.
One hundred and twenty hospital outpatients, 20 (16.7%) male and 100 (83.3%) female, were randomized into traditional Thai massage and joint mobilization therapy. The average age of traditional Thai massage and joint mobilization was 50.7 years and 48.3 years, respectively. Both groups received each treatment for approximately 30 minutes twice per week over a four-week period. Total course did not exceed eight sessions.
With ITT, the mean VAS of traditional Thai massage group before treatment was 5.3 (SD = 1.7) and ODI was 24.9 (SD = 14.7), while in joint mobilization groups, the mean VAS was 5.0 (SD = 1.6) and ODI was 24.6 (SD = 15). After treatment, the mean VAS and ODI were significantly reduced (VAS = 0.51 (SD = 0.89) and ODI = 8.1 (SD = 10.7) for traditional Thai massage, VAS = 0.86 (SD = 1.49) and ODI = 8.26 (SD = 12.97) for joint mobilization). Constipation was found in 34 patients (28.3%).
The traditional Thai massage and joint mobilization used in this study were equally effective for short-term reduction of pain and disability in patients with chronic nonspecific LBP. Both techniques were safe with short term effect in a chosen group of patients.
非特异性下腰痛(LBP)是一种常见的健康问题,由多种风险因素和人类行为导致。其中一些因素可能会协同作用,并与下腰痛的病因有关。传统泰式按摩和关节松动术作为常见的治疗方法,已被证明对某些非特异性LBP患者亚组有效。
该试验比较了传统泰式按摩和关节松动术治疗非特异性LBP的效果。研究纳入了一些相关因素。该研究在泰国曼谷勒德辛综合医院的骨科门诊部进行。
开展了一项无前瞻性随机对照研究。根据以往技术有效性的比较研究估算所需样本量。两项主要结局指标为0至10的视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)。次要结局指标为患者满意度和治疗不良反应。采用“意向性分析”(ITT)和符合方案分析方法比较治疗组之间差异的显著性。
120名医院门诊患者,20名(16.7%)男性和100名(83.3%)女性,被随机分为传统泰式按摩组和关节松动术治疗组。传统泰式按摩组和关节松动术治疗组的平均年龄分别为50.7岁和48.3岁。两组均接受为期四周的治疗,每周两次,每次约30分钟。总疗程不超过8次。
采用ITT分析,传统泰式按摩组治疗前的平均VAS为5.3(标准差=1.7),ODI为24.9(标准差=14.7),而关节松动术治疗组的平均VAS为5.0(标准差=1.6),ODI为24.6(标准差=15)。治疗后,传统泰式按摩组的平均VAS和ODI显著降低(VAS=0.51(标准差=0.89),ODI=8.1(标准差=10.7)),关节松动术治疗组的VAS=0.86(标准差=1.49),ODI=8.26(标准差=12.97)。发现34例患者(28.3%)出现便秘。
本研究中使用的传统泰式按摩和关节松动术在短期减轻慢性非特异性LBP患者的疼痛和功能障碍方面同样有效。在选定的患者组中,两种技术都安全且具有短期效果。