Geng Chong, Li Xiao, Luo Rong, Cai Lin, Lei Xuelian, Wang Chunhui
a Department of Gastroenterology , West China Hospital, Sichuan University , Chengdu , China.
b Digestive Endoscopic Center , West China Hospital, Sichuan University , Chengdu , China.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov;52(11):1286-1291. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1350284. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
To report our endoscopic outcomes and explore the effects of duration of impaction and anesthetic methods on the endoscopic removal of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract.
All consecutive patients with suspected foreign body (FB) ingestion between January 2013 and June 2016 were enrolled. Demographic, clinical and endoscopic data were collected and analyzed.
A total of 1294 patients aged seven months to 94 years were enrolled. Odynophagia (415 cases, 32.1%), FB sensation (340 cases, 26.3%) and sore throat (267 cases, 20.1%) were the most frequent complaints. The duration of FB impaction ranged from 4 h to over two years. Anatomically, foreign bodies were most commonly located in the esophagus (n = 1025, 86.9%). Bony foreign bodies comprised the majority of identified foreign bodies. The most common underlying pathology was esophageal stricture (38 cases, 53.5%). Nearly half of the patients (49.9%) developed complications. As the duration of impaction increased, the success rate by endoscopy decreased (p < .001), and the complication rate increased (p < .001). Endoscopic management under general anesthesia didn't improve the success rate or lower the complication rate compared with topical pharyngeal anesthesia (p = .793 and p = .085). Age ≥60, duration of impaction longer than one day, impaction in the esophagus, and sharp foreign bodies were identified as risk factors for complications.
Delayed flexible endoscopy in patients, especially elderly patients, with sharp FB impactions in the esophagus results in worse endoscopic outcomes. Endoscopic management under general anesthesia did not improve the therapeutic results compared with topical pharyngeal anesthesia.
报告我们的内镜治疗结果,并探讨异物嵌顿时间和麻醉方法对上消化道异物内镜取出的影响。
纳入2013年1月至2016年6月期间所有连续的疑似异物吞食患者。收集并分析人口统计学、临床和内镜数据。
共纳入1294例年龄在7个月至94岁之间的患者。吞咽痛(415例,32.1%)、异物感(340例,26.3%)和咽痛(267例,20.1%)是最常见的主诉。异物嵌顿时间从4小时到两年以上不等。从解剖学角度看,异物最常见于食管(n = 1025,86.9%)。骨类异物占已识别异物的大多数。最常见的基础病理是食管狭窄(38例,53.5%)。近一半的患者(49.9%)发生了并发症。随着嵌顿时间的增加,内镜取出成功率降低(p <.001),并发症发生率增加(p <.001)。与咽部局部麻醉相比,全身麻醉下的内镜治疗并未提高成功率或降低并发症发生率(p = 0.793和p = 0.085)。年龄≥60岁、嵌顿时间超过一天、食管嵌顿和尖锐异物被确定为并发症的危险因素。
对于食管内有尖锐异物嵌顿的患者,尤其是老年患者,延迟进行软性内镜检查会导致更差的内镜治疗结果。与咽部局部麻醉相比,全身麻醉下的内镜治疗并未改善治疗效果。