Racine Sarah E, VanHuysse Jessica L, Keel Pamela K, Burt S Alexandra, Neale Michael C, Boker Steven, Klump Kelly L
Department of Psychology, Ohio University.
Department of Behavioral Medicine, Genesys Regional Medical Center.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Jul;126(5):481-494. doi: 10.1037/abn0000204.
Theoretical models of binge eating and eating disorders include both transdiagnostic and eating disorder-specific risk factors. Negative urgency (i.e., the tendency to act impulsively when distressed) is a critical transdiagnostic risk factor for binge eating, but limited research has examined interactions between negative urgency and disorder-specific variables. Investigating these interactions can help identify the circumstances under which negative urgency is most strongly associated with binge eating. We examined whether prominent risk factors (i.e., appearance pressures, thin-ideal internalization, body dissatisfaction, dietary restraint) specified in well-established etiologic models of eating disorders moderate negative urgency-binge eating associations. Further, we investigated whether phenotypic moderation effects were due to genetic and/or environmental associations between negative urgency and binge eating. Participants were 988 female twins aged 11-25 years from the Michigan State University Twin Registry. Appearance pressures, thin-ideal internalization, and body dissatisfaction, but not dietary restraint, significantly moderated negative urgency-binge eating associations, with high levels of these risk factors and high negative urgency associated with the greatest binge eating. Twin moderation models revealed that genetic, but not environmental, sharing between negative urgency and binge eating was enhanced at higher levels of these eating disorder-specific variables. Future longitudinal research should investigate whether eating disorder risk factors shape genetic influences on negative urgency into manifesting as binge eating. (PsycINFO Database Record
暴饮暴食和饮食失调的理论模型包括跨诊断和特定饮食失调的风险因素。消极紧迫感(即痛苦时冲动行事的倾向)是暴饮暴食的关键跨诊断风险因素,但对消极紧迫感与特定障碍变量之间相互作用的研究有限。研究这些相互作用有助于确定消极紧迫感与暴饮暴食联系最为紧密的情况。我们研究了饮食失调既定病因模型中明确的显著风险因素(即外表压力、瘦理想内化、身体不满、饮食限制)是否会调节消极紧迫感与暴饮暴食之间的关联。此外,我们还研究了表型调节效应是否归因于消极紧迫感与暴饮暴食之间的遗传和/或环境关联。参与者是来自密歇根州立大学双胞胎登记处的988名11至25岁的女性双胞胎。外表压力、瘦理想内化和身体不满,而非饮食限制,显著调节了消极紧迫感与暴饮暴食之间的关联,这些风险因素水平较高且消极紧迫感较强时,与最严重的暴饮暴食相关。双胞胎调节模型显示,在这些特定饮食失调变量水平较高时,消极紧迫感与暴饮暴食之间的遗传共享(而非环境共享)会增强。未来的纵向研究应调查饮食失调风险因素是否会塑造遗传对消极紧迫感的影响,使其表现为暴饮暴食。(PsycINFO数据库记录