• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加强初级卫生保健团队配备姑息治疗领导者:一项群组随机临床试验方案。

Strengthening primary health care teams with palliative care leaders: protocol for a cluster randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Primary Care Research Unit of Mallorca, Baleares Health Services-IbSalut, 07005, Palma, Spain.

Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Palma (IdISPa), 07010, Palma, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Jul 10;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0217-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-017-0217-9
PMID:28693520
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5504625/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of the Balearic Islands Palliative Care (PC) Program is to improve the quality of PC through a shared model consisting of primary health care professionals, home-based PC teams, and PC units in hospitals. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), patients with advanced cancer and other terminal diseases benefit from early identification and proactive PC. We will evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention in which a PC leader is established in the primary health care center, and assess the effect of this intervention on the early identification of patients in need of PC, the efficient use of health care services, and direct health care costs.

METHODS

Design: A two-arm cluster randomized clinical trial of 30 Primary Health Care Centers (PHCC) in Mallorca (Spain), in which each center was randomized to an intervention arm or a usual care arm. We expect that the number of patients identified as suitable for PC (including non-oncological PC) is at least 5% greater in the intervention arm.

SAMPLE SIZE

A total of 4640 deceased patients. Outcomes will be assessed by a blinded external review of the electronic records.

INTERVENTIONS

General practitioners (GPs) and nurse leaders in PC for each PHCC will be appointed. These leaders will help promote PC training of colleagues, improve symptom management and psychological support of patients, and evaluate the complexity of individual cases so that these cases receive assistance from PC home-based teams.

MEASUREMENTS

Early identification (>90 days before death), evaluation of case complexity, level of case complexity (with referral to a home-based PC team), use and cost of hospital and primary care services, and quality of life during the last month of life (≥2 emergency room visits, ≥2 hospital admissions, ≥14 days of hospitalization).

DISCUSION

PC leaders in primary care teams will improve the early identification of patients eligible for PC. This initiative could improve the quality of end-of-life care and utilization of hospital resources.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN Registry identifier: ISRCTN92479122 . Retrospectively registered on 28 February 2017.

摘要

背景

巴利阿里群岛姑息治疗(PC)计划的目标是通过由初级保健专业人员、家庭 PC 团队和医院 PC 单元组成的共享模式来提高 PC 的质量。根据世界卫生组织(WHO)的说法,患有晚期癌症和其他终末期疾病的患者受益于早期识别和积极的 PC。我们将评估在初级保健中心设立 PC 负责人的干预措施的有效性,并评估该干预措施对早期识别需要 PC 的患者、有效利用医疗保健服务以及直接医疗保健成本的影响。

方法

设计:在西班牙马略卡岛的 30 个初级保健中心(PHCC)进行的一项两臂聚类随机临床试验,每个中心被随机分配到干预组或常规护理组。我们预计干预组中适合 PC(包括非肿瘤 PC)的患者数量至少增加 5%。

样本量

共 4640 名已故患者。将通过对电子记录的盲法外部审查来评估结果。

干预措施

为每个 PHCC 的全科医生(GP)和 PC 护士负责人任命。这些负责人将帮助促进同事的 PC 培训,改善患者的症状管理和心理支持,并评估个体病例的复杂性,以便这些病例得到家庭 PC 团队的帮助。

测量

早期识别(死亡前>90 天)、病例复杂性评估、病例复杂性水平(转介至家庭 PC 团队)、医院和初级保健服务的使用和成本,以及生命最后一个月的生活质量(≥2 次急诊就诊、≥2 次住院、≥14 天住院)。

讨论

初级保健团队中的 PC 负责人将改善对符合 PC 条件的患者的早期识别。这项倡议可以改善临终关怀的质量和医院资源的利用。

试验注册

ISRCTN 注册表标识符:ISRCTN92479122。于 2017 年 2 月 28 日回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb2/5504625/9561f9f164dd/12904_2017_217_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb2/5504625/a61ab0eb6fc7/12904_2017_217_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb2/5504625/9561f9f164dd/12904_2017_217_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb2/5504625/a61ab0eb6fc7/12904_2017_217_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bb2/5504625/9561f9f164dd/12904_2017_217_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Strengthening primary health care teams with palliative care leaders: protocol for a cluster randomized clinical trial.加强初级卫生保健团队配备姑息治疗领导者:一项群组随机临床试验方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Jul 10;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0217-9.
2
Optimal care at the end of life (OPAL): study protocol of a prospective interventional mixed-methods study with pretest-posttest-design in a primary health care setting considering the view of general practitioners, relatives of deceased patients and health care stakeholders.终末期最佳护理(OPAL):一项在初级医疗保健环境中进行的前瞻性干预性混合方法研究的研究方案,考虑到全科医生、已故患者亲属和医疗保健利益相关者的观点,采用预测试后设计。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 15;19(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4321-9.
3
PALLiON - PALLiative care Integrated in ONcology: study protocol for a Norwegian national cluster-randomized control trial with a complex intervention of early integration of palliative care.PALLiON - 肿瘤患者姑息治疗整合:一项挪威全国集群随机对照试验的研究方案,采用早期姑息治疗整合的复杂干预措施。
Trials. 2020 Apr 2;21(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4224-4.
4
A phase II study in advanced cancer patients to evaluate the early transition to palliative care (the PREPArE trial): protocol study for a randomized controlled trial.一项针对晚期癌症患者评估早期过渡到姑息治疗的II期研究(PREPArE试验):一项随机对照试验的方案研究
Trials. 2015 Apr 12;16:160. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0655-8.
5
Optimizing huddle engagement through leadership and problem-solving within primary care: A study protocol for a cluster randomized trial.通过领导力和问题解决优化初级保健中的团队协作:一项群组随机试验研究方案。
Trials. 2018 Oct 4;19(1):536. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2847-5.
6
Family conferences and shared prioritisation to improve patient safety in the frail elderly (COFRAIL): study protocol of a cluster randomised intervention trial in primary care.家庭会议和共同优先级排序以改善虚弱老年人的患者安全(COFRAIL):初级保健中群组随机干预试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Mar 20;21(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4182-x.
7
Increasing palliative care capacity in primary care: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial of the CAPACITI training program.在基层医疗中增加姑息治疗能力:CAPACITI 培训计划的一项群组随机对照试验研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Jan 5;22(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01124-x.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Primary palliative Care in General Practice - study protocol of a three-stage mixed-methods organizational health services research study.初级缓和医疗在全科医学中的应用——一项三阶段混合方法组织卫生服务研究的研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Jan 30;17(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0276-6.
10
Effectiveness of a specialist palliative home care nurse-patient consultation followed by an interprofessional telephone case conference compared with usual care among patients with non-oncological palliative care needs: protocol for the multicentre KOPAL cluster-randomised controlled trial.专科姑息治疗居家护理护士-患者咨询,以及随后进行多学科电话病例会议,与非肿瘤姑息治疗需求患者的常规护理相比的效果:多中心 KOPAL 集群随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 25;12(7):e059440. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059440.

引用本文的文献

1
Early Detection of Palliative Care Needs in Critically Ill Patients Using the NECPAL Tool.使用NECPAL工具对危重症患者姑息治疗需求的早期检测
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 4;14(17):6244. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176244.
2
Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Instrument for the Diagnosis of the Complexity of Palliative Care Needs.姑息治疗需求复杂性诊断工具的翻译与跨文化调适
Palliat Med Rep. 2025 Apr 22;6(1):187-195. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2024.0065. eCollection 2025.
3
Reforms and innovations in primary health care in different countries: scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
A retrospective population based cohort study of access to specialist palliative care in the last year of life: who is still missing out a decade on?一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究:关于生命最后一年获得专科姑息治疗的情况——十年过去了,谁仍未得到治疗?
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 May 10;15:46. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0119-2.
2
Systematic Quality Monitoring For Specialized Palliative Care Services: Development of a Minimal Set of Quality Indicators for Palliative Care Study (QPAC).专科姑息治疗服务的系统质量监测:姑息治疗研究(QPAC)最小质量指标集的制定
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Jul;34(6):532-546. doi: 10.1177/1049909116642174. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
3
不同国家初级卫生保健的改革与创新:范围综述
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024 Apr 23;25:e22. doi: 10.1017/S1463423623000725.
4
Collective leadership to improve professional practice, healthcare outcomes and staff well-being.集体领导以改善专业实践、医疗保健结果和员工福祉。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 10;10(10):CD013850. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013850.pub2.
5
Implementation of Primary Palliative Care in five Belgian regions: A qualitative study on early identification of palliative care needs by general practitioners.在五个比利时地区实施初级姑息治疗:全科医生早期识别姑息治疗需求的定性研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2020 Dec;26(1):146-153. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2020.1825675.
6
Level of Palliative Care Complexity in Advanced Cancer Patients: A Multinomial Logistic Analysis.晚期癌症患者的姑息治疗复杂程度:多项逻辑回归分析
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 23;9(6):1960. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061960.
7
Palliative Care: Too Good to Be True?姑息治疗:好得难以置信?
Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2020 Oct 14;11(4):e0034. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10394.
Family Perspectives on Aggressive Cancer Care Near the End of Life.
家庭对临终前积极癌症治疗的看法。
JAMA. 2016 Jan 19;315(3):284-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18604.
4
Implementation of a Care Pathway for Primary Palliative Care in 5 research clusters in Belgium: quasi-experimental study protocol and innovations in data collection (pro-SPINOZA).比利时5个研究集群中初级姑息治疗护理路径的实施:准实验研究方案及数据收集创新(亲斯宾诺莎研究)
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Sep 28;14:46. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0043-x.
5
Factors associated with aggressive end of life cancer care.与癌症临终积极治疗相关的因素。
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Mar;24(3):1079-89. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2885-4. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
6
What matters time? The importance of time for those with advanced progressive disease and their families.时间有什么重要的?时间对于患有晚期进行性疾病的患者及其家人的重要性。
Palliat Med. 2015 Jan;29(1):3-4. doi: 10.1177/0269216314559899.
7
Identifying patients with chronic conditions in need of palliative care in the general population: development of the NECPAL tool and preliminary prevalence rates in Catalonia.在普通人群中识别需要姑息治疗的慢性病患者:NECPAL工具的开发及加泰罗尼亚的初步患病率
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2013 Sep;3(3):300-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000211. Epub 2012 Dec 15.
8
Development and evaluation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT): a mixed-methods study.支持和姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT)的开发和评估:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2014 Sep;4(3):285-90. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000488. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
9
Evidence on the cost and cost-effectiveness of palliative care: a literature review.姑息治疗的成本及成本效益证据:一项文献综述。
Palliat Med. 2014 Feb;28(2):130-50. doi: 10.1177/0269216313493466. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
10
How many people need palliative care? A study developing and comparing methods for population-based estimates.有多少人需要姑息治疗?一项关于制定和比较基于人群估计方法的研究。
Palliat Med. 2014 Jan;28(1):49-58. doi: 10.1177/0269216313489367. Epub 2013 May 21.