• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同信任模型在患者组织中代表性的相关性:概念性考量。

The relevance of different trust models for representation in patient organizations: conceptual considerations.

作者信息

Gerhards Helene, Jongsma Karin, Schicktanz Silke

机构信息

Institute of Political Science, University of Duisburg-Essen, Lotharstraße 65, 47057, Duisburg, Germany.

Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Humboldtallee 36, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2368-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-017-2368-z
PMID:28697729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5505133/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trust within organizations is important for ensuring members' acceptance of the organization's activities and to expand their scope of action. Remarkably, Patient Organizations (POs) that often both function as a forum for self-help and represent patients on the health-political level, have been understudied in this respect. This paper analyzes the relation between trust and representation in POs. We distinguish between two models of representation originating from political theory: the trustee and delegate model and between two types of trust: horizontal and vertical trust.

METHODS

Our theoretical approach is illustrated with an analysis of 13 interviews with representatives of German POs.

RESULTS

We have found that the delegate model requires horizontal trust and the trustee model vertical trust. Both models: horizontal/delegate and vertical/trustee exist within single POs.

CONCLUSIONS

The representation process within POs demands a balancing act between inclusion of affected persons and strategically aggregating a clear-cut political claim. Trust plays in that process of coming from individual wishes to collective and political standpoints a major role both in terms of horizontal as well as vertical trust. Horizontal trust serves the communication between affected members, and vertical trust allows representatives to be decisive.

摘要

背景

组织内部的信任对于确保成员接受组织活动并扩大其行动范围至关重要。值得注意的是,患者组织(POs)既经常充当自助论坛,又在健康政治层面代表患者,但在这方面的研究却很少。本文分析了患者组织中信任与代表之间的关系。我们区分了源自政治理论的两种代表模式:受托人和代表模式,以及两种信任类型:横向信任和纵向信任。

方法

我们通过对德国患者组织代表的13次访谈分析来说明我们的理论方法。

结果

我们发现代表模式需要横向信任,受托模式需要纵向信任。这两种模式:横向/代表和纵向/受托,都存在于单个患者组织中。

结论

患者组织内部的代表过程需要在纳入受影响人员和战略性地汇总明确的政治主张之间进行平衡。在从个人愿望到集体和政治立场的过程中,信任在横向和纵向信任方面都起着重要作用。横向信任有助于受影响成员之间的沟通,纵向信任使代表能够做出决定性决策。

相似文献

1
The relevance of different trust models for representation in patient organizations: conceptual considerations.不同信任模型在患者组织中代表性的相关性:概念性考量。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2368-z.
2
Legislating Patient Representation: A Comparison Between Austrian and German Regulations on Self-Help Organizations as Patient Representatives.为患者代表立法:奥地利与德国关于自助组织作为患者代表的法规比较
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Sep;15(3):351-358. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9864-7. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
3
Epistemic injustice in dementia and autism patient organizations: An empirical analysis.痴呆症和自闭症患者组织中的认知不公正:一项实证分析。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Oct-Dec;8(4):221-233. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1402833. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
4
Patient Representation and Advocacy for Alzheimer Disease in Germany and Israel.德国和以色列针对阿尔茨海默病的患者代表与宣传活动
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Sep;15(3):369-380. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9871-8. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
5
The challenge of democratic patient representation: Understanding the representation work of patient organizations through methodological triangulation.民主的患者代表面临的挑战:通过方法学的三角测量理解患者组织的代表性工作。
Health Policy. 2019 Jan;123(1):109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.11.011. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
6
[Kick-off article: Patients first in health care: Status quo].[开篇文章:医疗保健以人为本:现状]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Apr;121:54-57. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
7
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
8
Medical overuse and quaternary prevention in primary care - A qualitative study with general practitioners.基层医疗中的医疗过度使用与四级预防——一项针对全科医生的定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Dec 8;18(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0667-4.
9
Representative Claims in Healthcare: Identifying the Variety in Patient Representation.医疗保健中的代表性主张:识别患者代表性的多样性。
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Sep;15(3):359-368. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9861-x. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
10
Representing autism: Challenges of collective representation in German and Israeli associations for and of autistic people.代表自闭症:德国和以色列自闭症协会在集体代表性方面面临的挑战。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Mar;200:65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.024. Epub 2018 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Collecting Patient Feedback as a Means of Monitoring Patient Experience and Hospital Service Quality - Learning from a Government-led Initiative.收集患者反馈作为监测患者体验和医院服务质量的一种手段——从一项政府主导的倡议中学习
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Feb 13;17:385-400. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S397444. eCollection 2023.
2
Representation in participatory health care decision-making: Reflections on an Application-Oriented Model.参与式医疗保健决策中的代表性:对应用型模型的反思。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1444-1452. doi: 10.1111/hex.13483. Epub 2022 Mar 27.
3
Perceived Social Influences on Women's Decisions to use Medications not Studied in Pregnancy. A Qualitative Ethical Analysis of Preexposure Prophylaxis Implementation Research in Kenya.感知到的社会影响对女性在怀孕期间使用未经研究的药物的决策。肯尼亚暴露前预防实施研究的定性伦理分析。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2021 Jul;16(3):225-237. doi: 10.1177/15562646211012296. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
4
Hypothetical acceptability of hospital-based post-mortem pediatric minimally invasive tissue sampling in Malawi: The role of complex social relationships.马拉维基于医院的死后儿科微创组织采样的假设可接受性:复杂社会关系的作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 4;16(2):e0246369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246369. eCollection 2021.
5
Involving Patient Groups in Drug Research: A Systematic Review of Reasons.让患者群体参与药物研究:原因的系统综述
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Mar 12;14:587-597. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S232499. eCollection 2020.
6
One For All, All For One? Collective Representation in Healthcare Policy.我为人人,人人为我?医疗保健政策中的集体代表性。
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Sep;15(3):337-340. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9870-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Conflicts of Interest for Patient-Advocacy Organizations.患者权益倡导组织的利益冲突
N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 2;376(9):880-885. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1610625.
2
Understanding collective agency in bioethics.理解生物伦理学中的集体能动性。
Med Health Care Philos. 2016 Sep;19(3):411-22. doi: 10.1007/s11019-016-9695-4.
3
The unbearable lightness of citizens within public deliberation processes.公共审议过程中公民的难以承受的轻盈感。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jun;74(12):1843-50. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.023. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
4
The patient movement as an emancipation movement.患者运动作为一场解放运动。
Health Expect. 2008 Jun;11(2):102-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00475.x.
5
Social movements in health: an introduction.健康领域的社会运动:引言
Sociol Health Illn. 2004 Sep;26(6):679-94. doi: 10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00413.x.
6
Substituted judgment, best interests, and the need for best respect.替代判断、最佳利益以及给予最大尊重的必要性。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1994 Spring;3(2):195-208. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100004928.