Suppr超能文献

既往腹腔镜经验对学习经脐单孔腹腔镜手术的影响:一项在活体猪模型中使用膀胱修补术的前瞻性比较初步研究。

The influence of prior laparoscopic experience on learning laparoendoscopic single site surgery: a prospective comparative preliminary study using cystorraphy in a live porcine model.

作者信息

Ha U-Syn, Lee Kyu Won, Kim Sun Wook, Jeon Seung Hyun, Kwon Tae Gyun, Park Hyung Keun, Hong Sung-Hoo

机构信息

Department of Urology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.

Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

BMC Urol. 2017 Jul 12;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0242-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of prior laparoscopic experience on the ability to learn laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) skills.

METHODS

A total of 33 urologists who completed a training program in LESS surgery were recruited for this study. After completing the educational course and training, the study participants demonstrated LESS suturing and knot-tying via a 2-cm cystotomy in a live porcine model for 15 min. An objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) was used to evaluate videos of each participant's procedure. The participants were divided according to laparoscopic experience; advanced experienced group (AS), intermediate experienced group (IS), novice group (NS).

RESULTS

Three participants in the NS group completed the porcine cystorrhaphy in 15 min (30.0%), 3 (25.0%) completed the task in the IS group, and 3 (27.2%) completed it in the AS group. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean total OSATS quality score (NS; 16.7, IS; 18.5, AS; 16.8) among the 3 groups. Concerning all each assessment, there were also no statistically significant difference. Additionaly, the mean total OSATS quantity score (NS; 4.1, IS; 3.5, AS; 4.3) did not differ significantly among groups. The NS group succeeded a mean of 1.4 knots, the IS group succeeded 0.9, and the AS group 1.3 (p = 0.727).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference among the groups in LESS proficiency after training. Surgeons who were novices in conventional laparoscopic surgery reached comparable scores to those of experienced laparoscopic surgeons after training.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估既往腹腔镜手术经验对学习经自然腔道内镜手术(LESS)技能能力的影响。

方法

本研究招募了33名完成LESS手术培训项目的泌尿外科医生。在完成教育课程和培训后,研究参与者在活猪模型中通过2厘米的膀胱切开术展示LESS缝合和打结操作15分钟。使用客观结构化技术技能评估(OSATS)来评估每位参与者手术的视频。参与者根据腹腔镜经验进行分组;高级经验组(AS)、中级经验组(IS)、新手组(NS)。

结果

NS组有3名参与者在15分钟内完成了猪膀胱修补术(30.0%),IS组有3名(25.0%)完成了任务,AS组有3名(27.2%)完成了任务。3组之间的平均OSATS总质量得分(NS组为16.7,IS组为18.5,AS组为16.8)无统计学显著差异。在所有各项评估中,也无统计学显著差异。此外,各组之间的平均OSATS数量得分(NS组为4.1,IS组为3.5,AS组为4.3)也无显著差异。NS组平均成功打1.4个结,IS组成功0.9个,AS组成功1.3个(p = 0.727)。

结论

培训后各组在LESS熟练程度上无显著差异。在传统腹腔镜手术中为新手的外科医生在培训后达到了与经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生相当的分数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验