Miklavcic John Janez, Flaman Paul
Alberta Institute for Human Nutrition, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
St. Joseph's College, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Linacre Q. 2017 May;84(2):130-144. doi: 10.1080/00243639.2017.1299896. Epub 2017 May 31.
The fields of biology, medicine, and embryology have described the developmental milestones of humans throughout gestation in great detail. It is less clear as to when humans are recognized as people, persons, or beings with rights that are protected by legislation. The practice of law is irrevocably intertwined with that of ethical conduct; and the time at which a human life is considered a person has implications that extend to health care, legislation on abortion, and autonomy of individuals. This article reviews the economical position that fertilization is the moment that personhood of the conceptus begins. Alternate positions proposing that personhood begins at other possible times after fertilization are presented and contrasted to the economical hypothesis. : This article is an original work critically analyzing the various arguments for human personhood at fertilization and thereafter. The various positions on human personhood are compared and contrasted herein. The time of the human lifespan at which personhood is conferred has important implications for health care, legislation, and personal autonomy.
生物学、医学和胚胎学领域已经非常详细地描述了人类在整个妊娠期的发育里程碑。然而,关于人类何时被视为享有受法律保护权利的人、个体或存在,目前尚不清楚。法律实践与道德行为不可分割地交织在一起;而人类生命被视为一个人的时间点,其影响延伸到医疗保健、堕胎立法和个人自主权等方面。本文回顾了一种观点,即受精是胚胎开始具有人格的时刻。文中还提出了受精后其他可能时间点开始具有人格的不同观点,并与上述观点进行了对比。:本文是一篇原创作品,批判性地分析了受精及之后关于人类人格的各种论点。本文对关于人类人格的各种观点进行了比较和对比。赋予人格的人类生命阶段对医疗保健、立法和个人自主权具有重要影响。