Vesterinen Hanna M, Morello-Frosch Rachel, Sen Saunak, Zeise Lauren, Woodruff Tracey J
Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment, University of California, San Francisco, United States of America.
Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management and School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 12;12(7):e0176331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176331. eCollection 2017.
Adverse effects of prenatal stress or environmental chemical exposures on fetal growth are well described, yet their combined effect remains unclear.
To conduct a systematic review on the combined impact and interaction of prenatal exposure to stress and chemicals on developmental outcomes.
We used the first three steps of the Navigation Guide systematic review. We wrote a protocol, performed a robust literature search to identify relevant animal and human studies and extracted data on developmental outcomes. For the most common outcome (fetal growth), we evaluated risk of bias, calculated effect sizes for main effects of individual and combined exposures, and performed a random effects meta-analysis of those studies reporting on odds of low birthweight (LBW) by smoking and socioeconomic status (SES).
We identified 17 human- and 22 animal-studies of combined chemical and stress exposures and fetal growth. Human studies tended to have a lower risk of bias across nine domains. Generally, we found stronger effects for chemicals than stress, and these exposures were associated with reduced fetal growth in the low-stress group and the association was often greater in high stress groups, with limited evidence of effect modification. We found smoking associated with significantly increased odds of LBW, with a greater effect for high stress (low SES; OR 4.75 (2.46-9.16)) compared to low stress (high SES; OR 1.95 (95% CI 1.53-2.48)). Animal studies generally had a high risk of bias with no significant combined effect or effect modification.
We found that despite concern for the combined effects of environmental chemicals and stress, this is still an under-studied topic, though limited available human studies indicate chemical exposures exert stronger effects than stress, and this effect is generally larger in the presence of stress.
产前应激或环境化学物质暴露对胎儿生长的不良影响已有充分描述,但其联合效应仍不明确。
对产前暴露于应激和化学物质对发育结局的联合影响及相互作用进行系统评价。
我们采用了导航指南系统评价的前三个步骤。我们制定了方案,进行了全面的文献检索以识别相关的动物和人体研究,并提取了发育结局的数据。对于最常见的结局(胎儿生长),我们评估了偏倚风险,计算了个体暴露和联合暴露主要效应的效应量,并对那些报告吸烟和社会经济地位(SES)导致低出生体重(LBW)几率的研究进行了随机效应荟萃分析。
我们确定了17项关于化学物质和应激联合暴露与胎儿生长的人体研究以及22项动物研究。人体研究在九个领域的偏倚风险往往较低。一般来说,我们发现化学物质的影响比应激更强,这些暴露与低应激组胎儿生长减少有关,而在高应激组这种关联通常更大,效应修饰的证据有限。我们发现吸烟与LBW几率显著增加有关,与低应激(高SES;比值比1.95(95%可信区间1.53 - 2.48))相比,高应激(低SES;比值比4.75(2.46 - 9.16))时的影响更大。动物研究一般偏倚风险较高,没有显著的联合效应或效应修饰。
我们发现,尽管人们关注环境化学物质和应激的联合效应,但这仍是一个研究不足的主题,不过有限的现有人体研究表明,化学物质暴露的影响比应激更强,而且在存在应激的情况下这种影响通常更大。