Suppr超能文献

胃底折叠术失败后的再次手术模式:一项 9462 例患者的分析。

Patterns of reoperation after failed fundoplication: an analysis of 9462 patients.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA.

Stony Brook University Hospital, HST Level 19, Room 053, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8191, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):345-350. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5682-y. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the choice of reoperation after failed fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Both redo fundoplication and conversion procedure to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are safe and effective. We aimed to characterize the rates of different revisional procedures and to identify risk factors associated with failed fundoplication.

METHODS

Using a statewide database, we examined records for patients who underwent fundoplication between 2000 and 2010. The primary outcomes were the rate of each type of reoperation and the pattern of subsequent procedures. Demographics and comorbidities were used in a multivariable logistic regression model to identify risk factors associated with reoperation after fundoplication.

RESULTS

A total of 9462 patients were included. Overall, 430 (4.5%) patients underwent reoperation. Of those, 46 (10.7%) patients underwent RYGB at first reoperation, with the remainder having a redo fundoplication. An additional five patients were converted to RYGB after undergoing a redo fundoplication (51 total patients converted to RYGB at any point, 11.9%). Eighty-three percent of patients converted to RYGB were obese, as opposed to 8% for redo fundoplication. A single redo fundoplication was done in 81% of patients, while 35 patients (8.1%) underwent two or more revisional procedures. On average, any reoperation was performed 2.9 years after fundoplication, with redo fundoplication 2.5 years and RYGB 6.5 years later. Age 30-49 years (vs. >70 years; OR 2.01, p = 0.011) and 50-69 years (vs. >70 years; OR 1.61, p = 0.011), female gender (OR 1.56, p = < 0.0001), and chronic pulmonary disease (OR 1.40, p = 0.0044) were associated with revisional surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Fundoplication has a low reoperation rate within a mean 8.3 years of follow-up. Redo fundoplication is more commonly performed and at an earlier point than conversion to RYGB. Younger age, female gender, and chronic pulmonary disease are associated with reoperation after fundoplication.

摘要

背景

对于胃食管反流病(GERD)患者,食管裂孔疝修补术后复发的再手术选择知之甚少。再次行抗反流手术(redo fundoplication)和改行 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)均安全有效。本研究旨在描述不同翻修手术的发生率,并确定与食管裂孔疝修补术后失败相关的风险因素。

方法

利用全州范围的数据库,我们检查了 2000 年至 2010 年间行抗反流手术的患者记录。主要结局是每种类型的再手术率以及随后手术的模式。采用多变量逻辑回归模型对人口统计学和合并症进行分析,以确定与食管裂孔疝修补术后再手术相关的风险因素。

结果

共纳入 9462 例患者。总体而言,有 430 例(4.5%)患者接受了再手术。其中,46 例(10.7%)患者在首次再手术时行 RYGB,其余患者行 redo fundoplication。另有 5 例患者在 redo fundoplication 后改行 RYGB(51 例患者在任何时间点改行 RYGB,占 11.9%)。83%的改行 RYGB 的患者肥胖,而 redo fundoplication 为 8%。81%的患者仅行一次 redo fundoplication,而 35 例(8.1%)患者行两次或多次翻修手术。平均而言,任何再手术都在抗反流手术后 2.9 年进行,redo fundoplication 为 2.5 年,RYGB 为 6.5 年。30-49 岁(vs. >70 岁;OR 2.01,p=0.011)和 50-69 岁(vs. >70 岁;OR 1.61,p=0.011)、女性(OR 1.56,p<0.0001)和慢性肺部疾病(OR 1.40,p=0.0044)与翻修手术相关。

结论

食管裂孔疝修补术后平均 8.3 年的随访中,翻修手术率较低。redo fundoplication 比改行 RYGB 更常见,且时间更早。年龄较小、女性和慢性肺部疾病与食管裂孔疝修补术后再手术相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验