Suppr超能文献

贝伐单抗治疗复发性胶质母细胞瘤的临床疗效:文献分析

Clinical outcomes in recurrent glioblastoma with bevacizumab therapy: An analysis of the literature.

作者信息

Tipping Matthew, Eickhoff Jens, Ian Robins H

机构信息

Department of Medicine University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792, United States.

Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792, United States; University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, UWSMPH, United States.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Oct;44:101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.070. Epub 2017 Jul 12.

Abstract

Bevacizumab (BEV) is a common treatment for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). After progression on BEV, there is no consensus on subsequent therapy, as multiple chemotherapy trials have failed to demonstrate discernible activity for salvage. A previous review (995 patients) estimated a progression free survival (PFS) on BEV of 4.2months (SD±2.1) with an overall survival (OS) after progression on BEV at 3.8months (SD±1). We endeavored to establish a more rigorous historical control, both as a benchmark for efficacy, and a prognostic tool for clinical practice. A comprehensive literature review was performed utilizing PubMed and societal presentation abstracts. A total 2388 patients from 53 arms of 42 studies were analyzed in three groups: 1) thirty-two studies in which survival post-BEV was determined by subtracting PFS from OS (2045 patients): PFS on BEV=4.38months (95% CI 4.09-4.68); OS post-BEV=3.36months (95% CI 3.12-3.66); 2) two studies (94 patients) in which OS post-BEV is reported: OS=3.26 (95% CI 2.39-4.42); 3) eight studies of salvage therapy after progression on BEV (249 patients): of OS post-BEV=4.46months (95% CI 3.68-5.54). These estimates provide a firm historical control for PFS on BEV, as well as OS after disease progression on BEV therapy.

摘要

贝伐单抗(BEV)是复发性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的常用治疗方法。在接受BEV治疗病情进展后,后续治疗尚无共识,因为多项化疗试验未能证明其在挽救治疗中的明显活性。先前一项综述(995例患者)估计,BEV治疗的无进展生存期(PFS)为4.2个月(标准差±2.1),BEV治疗病情进展后的总生存期(OS)为3.8个月(标准差±1)。我们致力于建立一个更严格的历史对照,既作为疗效的基准,也作为临床实践的预后工具。利用PubMed和学术会议报告摘要进行了全面的文献综述。对来自42项研究53个组的总共2388例患者进行了三组分析:1)32项研究,其中BEV治疗后的生存期通过从OS中减去PFS来确定(2045例患者):BEV治疗的PFS = 4.38个月(95%置信区间4.09 - 4.68);BEV治疗后的OS = 3.36个月(95%置信区间3.12 - 3.66);2)两项研究(94例患者)报告了BEV治疗后的OS:OS = 3.26(95%置信区间2.39 - 4.42);3)八项关于BEV治疗病情进展后挽救治疗的研究(249例患者):BEV治疗后的OS = 4.46个月(95%置信区间3.68 - 5.54)。这些估计为BEV治疗的PFS以及BEV治疗疾病进展后的OS提供了可靠的历史对照。

相似文献

1
Clinical outcomes in recurrent glioblastoma with bevacizumab therapy: An analysis of the literature.
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Oct;44:101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.070. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
2
Toxicity and efficacy of lomustine and bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma patients.
J Neurooncol. 2018 Apr;137(2):439-446. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2736-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
3
Prognostic factors in recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab.
J Neurooncol. 2016 Aug;129(1):93-100. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2144-7. Epub 2016 May 18.
8
The role of bevacizumab in the treatment of glioblastoma.
J Neurooncol. 2017 Jul;133(3):455-467. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2477-x. Epub 2017 May 19.
9
The earlier the better? Bevacizumab in the treatment of recurrent MGMT-non-methylated glioblastoma.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug;142(8):1825-9. doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2187-3. Epub 2016 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Locoregional delivery of IL-13Rα2-targeting CAR-T cells in recurrent high-grade glioma: a phase 1 trial.
Nat Med. 2024 Apr;30(4):1001-1012. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02875-1. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
2
An In Vitro Model of Glioma Development.
Genes (Basel). 2023 Apr 27;14(5):990. doi: 10.3390/genes14050990.
3
Molecular Pathways and Genomic Landscape of Glioblastoma Stem Cells: Opportunities for Targeted Therapy.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 31;14(15):3743. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153743.
4
Clinical applications of artificial intelligence and radiomics in neuro-oncology imaging.
Insights Imaging. 2021 Oct 21;12(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-01102-6.
5
Efficacy and safety of nivolumab in Japanese patients with first recurrence of glioblastoma: an open-label, non-comparative study.
Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec;26(12):2205-2215. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-02028-1. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
6
Accelerator-based BNCT for patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a multicenter phase II study.
Neurooncol Adv. 2021 May 20;3(1):vdab067. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab067. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
8
Apatinib Plus Temozolomide: An Effective Salvage Treatment for Recurrent Glioblastoma.
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 4;10:601175. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.601175. eCollection 2020.
9
Changes in the tumor microenvironment and outcome for TME-targeting therapy in glioblastoma: A pilot study.
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 5;16(2):e0246646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246646. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
A phase II trial of enzastaurin (LY317615) in combination with bevacizumab in adults with recurrent malignant gliomas.
J Neurooncol. 2016 Mar;127(1):127-35. doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-2020-x. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
4
Randomized phase 2 study of carboplatin and bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma.
Neuro Oncol. 2015 Nov;17(11):1504-13. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov104. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
5
A phase II study of feasibility and toxicity of bevacizumab in combination with temozolomide in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.
Clin Transl Oncol. 2015 Sep;17(9):743-50. doi: 10.1007/s12094-015-1304-0. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
8
Phase II study of panobinostat in combination with bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma and anaplastic glioma.
Neuro Oncol. 2015 Jun;17(6):862-7. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou350. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
9
Post Hoc analyses of intention-to-treat population in phase III comparison of NovoTTF-100A™ system versus best physician's choice chemotherapy.
Semin Oncol. 2014 Oct;41 Suppl 6:S25-34. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验