Melogno Sergio, Pinto Maria Antonietta, Di Filippo Gloria
Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Faculty of Psychology, "Niccolò Cusano" Telematic University - Rome, Via Don Carlo Gnocchi, 3, 00166 Rome, Italy.
Brain Sci. 2017 Jul 17;7(7):85. doi: 10.3390/brainsci7070085.
Recent research into difficulties in figurative language in children with ASD highlighted that it is possible to devise training interventions to overcome these difficulties by teaching specific strategies. This study describes how children with ASD can improve their capability to explain metaphors with a treatment. Two types of metaphors, in the "X is Y" form, were addressed: sensory and physico-psychological. To face the difficulties posed by these metaphors, the adult taught two strategies: inserting the connective "is like" between "X" and "Y", which transforms the metaphor into a simile; comparing "X" and "Y" by means of thinking maps. Two tests of metaphor comprehension were used, one based on sensory and the other on physico-psychological metaphors. Sixteen 10 year-old children participated into the study, including an experimental group formed by 8 children with ASD ( = 4) which had received the treatment, and a control group ( = 4) which had not, and 8 typically-developing (TD) children. At the post-test, the experimental group significantly outperformed the controls in explaining both types of metaphors, but only in the sensory metaphors did their performances reach TD children's levels. These results illuminate how clinical treatment can positively influence the developmental trajectories of metaphor comprehension.
近期针对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童在理解比喻性语言方面存在的困难所开展的研究强调,通过教授特定策略来设计训练干预措施以克服这些困难是可行的。本研究描述了患有ASD的儿童如何通过一种治疗方法来提高他们解释隐喻的能力。研究探讨了“X是Y”形式的两种隐喻:感官隐喻和身心隐喻。为了应对这些隐喻带来的困难,成年人教授了两种策略:在“X”和“Y”之间插入连接词“像”,这会将隐喻转化为明喻;借助思维地图比较“X”和“Y”。使用了两项隐喻理解测试,一项基于感官隐喻,另一项基于身心隐喻。16名10岁儿童参与了该研究,其中包括一个实验组,由8名接受了治疗的患有ASD的儿童(平均年龄 = 4岁)组成,以及一个未接受治疗的对照组(平均年龄 = 4岁),还有8名发育正常(TD)的儿童。在测试后,实验组在解释这两种隐喻方面的表现显著优于对照组,但只有在感官隐喻方面,他们的表现达到了发育正常儿童的水平。这些结果阐明了临床治疗如何能够对隐喻理解的发展轨迹产生积极影响。