de Voogd E L, de Hullu E, Burnett Heyes S, Blackwell S E, Wiers R W, Salemink E
Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 17;12(7):e0181147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181147. eCollection 2017.
Anxiety and depression are highly prevalent during adolescence and characterized by negative interpretation biases. Cognitive bias modification of interpretations (CBM-I) may reduce such biases and improve emotional functioning. However, as findings have been mixed and the traditional scenario training is experienced as relatively boring, a picture-based type of training might be more engaging and effective.
The current study investigated short- and long-term effects (up to 6 months) and users' experience of two types of CBM-I procedure in adolescents with heightened symptoms of anxiety or depression (N = 119, aged 12-18 year). Participants were randomized to eight online sessions of text-based scenario training, picture-word imagery training, or neutral control training.
No significant group differences were observed on primary or secondary emotional outcomes. A decrease in anxiety and depressive symptoms, and improvements in emotional resilience were observed, irrespective of condition. Scenario training marginally reduced negative interpretation bias on a closely matched assessment task, while no such effects were found on a different task, nor for the picture-word or control group. Subjective evaluations of all training paradigms were relatively negative and the imagery component appeared particularly difficult for adolescents with higher symptom levels.
The current results question the preventive efficacy and feasibility of both CBM-I procedures as implemented here in adolescents.
焦虑和抑郁在青少年时期极为普遍,其特点是存在负面解释偏差。对解释进行认知偏差矫正(CBM-I)可能会减少此类偏差并改善情绪功能。然而,由于研究结果不一,且传统的情景训练相对枯燥,基于图片的训练方式可能更具吸引力且更有效。
本研究调查了两种CBM-I程序对焦虑或抑郁症状加重的青少年(N = 119,年龄12 - 18岁)的短期和长期影响(长达6个月)以及用户体验。参与者被随机分配到八个在线课程,分别进行基于文本的情景训练文字 - 图片意象训练或中性对照训练。
在主要或次要情绪结果方面未观察到显著的组间差异。无论处于何种条件下,均观察到焦虑和抑郁症状有所减轻,情绪恢复力有所改善。情景训练在一项紧密匹配的评估任务上略微降低了负面解释偏差,但在另一项任务上未发现此类效果,图片文字组或对照组也未发现此类效果。对所有训练范式的主观评价相对负面,对于症状水平较高的青少年而言,意象部分似乎尤其困难。
目前的结果对在此实施的两种CBM-I程序在青少年中的预防效果和可行性提出了质疑。