• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于知识引导的策略,用于提高结合亲和力预测中评分函数的准确性。

A knowledge-guided strategy for improving the accuracy of scoring functions in binding affinity prediction.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 345 Lingling Road, Shanghai 200032, PR China.

出版信息

BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Apr 17;11:193. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-193.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2105-11-193
PMID:20398404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2868011/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current scoring functions are not very successful in protein-ligand binding affinity prediction albeit their popularity in structure-based drug designs. Here, we propose a general knowledge-guided scoring (KGS) strategy to tackle this problem. Our KGS strategy computes the binding constant of a given protein-ligand complex based on the known binding constant of an appropriate reference complex. A good training set that includes a sufficient number of protein-ligand complexes with known binding data needs to be supplied for finding the reference complex. The reference complex is required to share a similar pattern of key protein-ligand interactions to that of the complex of interest. Thus, some uncertain factors in protein-ligand binding may cancel out, resulting in a more accurate prediction of absolute binding constants.

RESULTS

In our study, an automatic algorithm was developed for summarizing key protein-ligand interactions as a pharmacophore model and identifying the reference complex with a maximal similarity to the query complex. Our KGS strategy was evaluated in combination with two scoring functions (X-Score and PLP) on three test sets, containing 112 HIV protease complexes, 44 carbonic anhydrase complexes, and 73 trypsin complexes, respectively. Our results obtained on crystal structures as well as computer-generated docking poses indicated that application of the KGS strategy produced more accurate predictions especially when X-Score or PLP alone did not perform well.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to other targeted scoring functions, our KGS strategy does not require any re-parameterization or modification on current scoring methods, and its application is not tied to certain systems. The effectiveness of our KGS strategy is in theory proportional to the ever-increasing knowledge of experimental protein-ligand binding data. Our KGS strategy may serve as a more practical remedy for current scoring functions to improve their accuracy in binding affinity prediction.

摘要

背景

尽管基于结构的药物设计中广泛使用了当前的评分函数,但它们在预测蛋白质-配体结合亲和力方面并不是非常成功。在这里,我们提出了一种通用的知识引导评分(KGS)策略来解决这个问题。我们的 KGS 策略基于适当参考复合物的已知结合常数来计算给定蛋白质-配体复合物的结合常数。需要提供一个包含足够数量具有已知结合数据的蛋白质-配体复合物的良好训练集,以找到参考复合物。参考复合物需要与感兴趣的复合物共享类似的关键蛋白质-配体相互作用模式。因此,蛋白质-配体结合中的一些不确定因素可能会相互抵消,从而更准确地预测绝对结合常数。

结果

在我们的研究中,开发了一种自动算法,用于总结关键的蛋白质-配体相互作用作为药效团模型,并识别与查询复合物具有最大相似性的参考复合物。我们的 KGS 策略与两种评分函数(X-Score 和 PLP)结合,分别对三个测试集进行了评估,包含 112 个 HIV 蛋白酶复合物、44 个碳酸酐酶复合物和 73 个胰蛋白酶复合物。我们在晶体结构和计算机生成的对接构象上获得的结果表明,应用 KGS 策略可以产生更准确的预测,特别是当 X-Score 或 PLP 单独表现不佳时。

结论

与其他靶向评分函数相比,我们的 KGS 策略不需要对当前评分方法进行任何重新参数化或修改,并且其应用不受特定系统的限制。我们的 KGS 策略的有效性在理论上与实验蛋白质-配体结合数据的不断增加的知识成正比。我们的 KGS 策略可能是当前评分函数提高结合亲和力预测准确性的更实用的补救措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa0/2868011/4e788c65468a/1471-2105-11-193-8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa0/2868011/07b19a8a1fc2/1471-2105-11-193-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa0/2868011/85986f436d25/1471-2105-11-193-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa0/2868011/ff5cf6aa6d83/1471-2105-11-193-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa0/2868011/03a85c692d0e/1471-2105-11-193-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa0/2868011/4ed27244aca7/1471-2105-11-193-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa0/2868011/23ee74b90fa9/1471-2105-11-193-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa0/2868011/0b1b7d0048da/1471-2105-11-193-7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa0/2868011/4e788c65468a/1471-2105-11-193-8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa0/2868011/07b19a8a1fc2/1471-2105-11-193-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa0/2868011/85986f436d25/1471-2105-11-193-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa0/2868011/ff5cf6aa6d83/1471-2105-11-193-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa0/2868011/03a85c692d0e/1471-2105-11-193-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa0/2868011/4ed27244aca7/1471-2105-11-193-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa0/2868011/23ee74b90fa9/1471-2105-11-193-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa0/2868011/0b1b7d0048da/1471-2105-11-193-7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caa0/2868011/4e788c65468a/1471-2105-11-193-8.jpg

相似文献

1
A knowledge-guided strategy for improving the accuracy of scoring functions in binding affinity prediction.一种基于知识引导的策略,用于提高结合亲和力预测中评分函数的准确性。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Apr 17;11:193. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-193.
2
Enhance the performance of current scoring functions with the aid of 3D protein-ligand interaction fingerprints.借助三维蛋白质-配体相互作用指纹图谱提高当前评分函数的性能。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Jul 18;18(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1750-5.
3
An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes.使用包含800个蛋白质-配体复合物的PDBbind精制集对14种评分函数进行的广泛测试。
J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004 Nov-Dec;44(6):2114-25. doi: 10.1021/ci049733j.
4
Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 2. Evaluation methods and general results.更新后的基准上评分函数的比较评估:2. 评估方法与总体结果。
J Chem Inf Model. 2014 Jun 23;54(6):1717-36. doi: 10.1021/ci500081m. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
5
Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.用于精确配体对接和排序的增强神经网络评分函数。
J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2018 Apr;16(2):1850004. doi: 10.1142/S021972001850004X. Epub 2018 Feb 4.
6
Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.基于相似性的配体对接和结合亲和力预测的非线性评分函数。
J Chem Inf Model. 2013 Nov 25;53(11):3097-112. doi: 10.1021/ci400510e. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
7
Statistical potential for modeling and ranking of protein-ligand interactions.用于蛋白质-配体相互作用建模和排序的统计势能。
J Chem Inf Model. 2011 Dec 27;51(12):3078-92. doi: 10.1021/ci200377u. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
8
A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach.一种用于蛋白质-配体相互作用的通用快速评分函数:一种简化的势能方法。
J Med Chem. 1999 Mar 11;42(5):791-804. doi: 10.1021/jm980536j.
9
Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.在多样化测试集上对评分函数的比较评估。
J Chem Inf Model. 2009 Apr;49(4):1079-93. doi: 10.1021/ci9000053.
10
Improving binding mode and binding affinity predictions of docking by ligand-based search of protein conformations: evaluation in D3R grand challenge 2015.通过基于配体的蛋白质构象搜索改进对接的结合模式和结合亲和力预测:2015年D3R大挑战中的评估
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2017 Aug;31(8):689-699. doi: 10.1007/s10822-017-0038-1. Epub 2017 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
analysis of the effect of HCV genotype-specific polymorphisms in Core, NS3, NS5A, and NS5B proteins on T-cell epitope processing and presentation.丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)核心蛋白、NS3蛋白、NS5A蛋白和NS5B蛋白中基因型特异性多态性对T细胞表位加工与呈递影响的分析
Front Microbiol. 2025 Jan 15;15:1498069. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1498069. eCollection 2024.
2
Enhance the performance of current scoring functions with the aid of 3D protein-ligand interaction fingerprints.借助三维蛋白质-配体相互作用指纹图谱提高当前评分函数的性能。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Jul 18;18(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1750-5.
3
Programmable co-delivery of the immune checkpoint inhibitor NLG919 and chemotherapeutic doxorubicin via a redox-responsive immunostimulatory polymeric prodrug carrier.

本文引用的文献

1
Targeted scoring functions for virtual screening.用于虚拟筛选的靶向打分函数。
Drug Discov Today. 2009 Jun;14(11-12):562-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2009.03.013. Epub 2009 Apr 5.
2
Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.在多样化测试集上对评分函数的比较评估。
J Chem Inf Model. 2009 Apr;49(4):1079-93. doi: 10.1021/ci9000053.
3
Interpretation of the binding affinities of PTP1B inhibitors with the MM-GB/SA method and the X-score scoring function.采用MM-GB/SA方法和X-score评分函数对蛋白酪氨酸磷酸酶1B(PTP1B)抑制剂的结合亲和力进行解读。
通过氧化还原响应性免疫刺激聚合物前药载体实现免疫检查点抑制剂NLG919和化疗药物阿霉素的可编程共递送。
Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2017 Jun;38(6):823-834. doi: 10.1038/aps.2017.44. Epub 2017 May 8.
4
Improving the accuracy of high-throughput protein-protein affinity prediction may require better training data.提高高通量蛋白质-蛋白质亲和力预测的准确性可能需要更好的训练数据。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Mar 23;18(Suppl 5):102. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1533-z.
5
Yada: a novel tool for molecular docking calculations.Yada:一种用于分子对接计算的新型工具。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2016 Sep;30(9):753-759. doi: 10.1007/s10822-016-9953-9. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
6
Different combinations of atomic interactions predict protein-small molecule and protein-DNA/RNA affinities with similar accuracy.不同的原子相互作用组合能够以相似的准确度预测蛋白质与小分子以及蛋白质与DNA/RNA的亲和力。
Proteins. 2015 Nov;83(11):2100-14. doi: 10.1002/prot.24928. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
7
Sanjeevini: a freely accessible web-server for target directed lead molecule discovery.桑吉维尼:一个免费访问的靶向导向先导分子发现的网络服务器。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2012;13 Suppl 17(Suppl 17):S7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-S17-S7. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
8
Structure-based virtual screening for drug discovery: a problem-centric review.基于结构的药物发现虚拟筛选:以问题为中心的综述。
AAPS J. 2012 Mar;14(1):133-41. doi: 10.1208/s12248-012-9322-0. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
9
Prediction of ligand binding using an approach designed to accommodate diversity in protein-ligand interactions.使用一种旨在适应蛋白质-配体相互作用多样性的方法来预测配体结合。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023215. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
10
Identifying compound-target associations by combining bioactivity profile similarity search and public databases mining.通过结合生物活性谱相似性搜索和公共数据库挖掘来鉴定化合物-靶标关联。
J Chem Inf Model. 2011 Sep 26;51(9):2440-8. doi: 10.1021/ci200192v. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
J Chem Inf Model. 2009 Apr;49(4):1033-48. doi: 10.1021/ci8004429.
4
The use of protein-ligand interaction fingerprints in docking.蛋白质-配体相互作用指纹图谱在对接中的应用。
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2008 May;11(3):356-64.
5
AutoShim: empirically corrected scoring functions for quantitative docking with a crystal structure and IC50 training data.自动垫片:用于结合晶体结构和半数抑制浓度(IC50)训练数据进行定量对接的经验校正评分函数。
J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Apr;48(4):861-72. doi: 10.1021/ci7004548. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
6
Optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio of scoring functions for protein--ligand docking.优化蛋白质-配体对接评分函数的信噪比。
J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Mar;48(3):602-12. doi: 10.1021/ci700345n. Epub 2008 Feb 23.
7
Consensus scoring with feature selection for structure-based virtual screening.基于结构的虚拟筛选中具有特征选择的共识评分
J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Feb;48(2):288-95. doi: 10.1021/ci700239t. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
8
Computation of octanol-water partition coefficients by guiding an additive model with knowledge.通过知识引导加和模型计算正辛醇-水分配系数。
J Chem Inf Model. 2007 Nov-Dec;47(6):2140-8. doi: 10.1021/ci700257y. Epub 2007 Nov 7.
9
Virtual screening strategies in drug discovery.药物研发中的虚拟筛选策略。
Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2007 Oct;11(5):494-502. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.08.033.
10
DrugScoreRNA--knowledge-based scoring function to predict RNA-ligand interactions.DrugScoreRNA——用于预测RNA与配体相互作用的基于知识的评分函数。
J Chem Inf Model. 2007 Sep-Oct;47(5):1868-76. doi: 10.1021/ci700134p. Epub 2007 Aug 18.