Suppr超能文献

电能对利用生物电效应进行生物膜处理效果的影响。

Effect of electrical energy on the efficacy of biofilm treatment using the bioelectric effect.

作者信息

Kim Young Wook, Subramanian Sowmya, Gerasopoulos Konstantinos, Ben-Yoav Hadar, Wu Hsuan-Chen, Quan David, Carter Karen, Meyer Mariana T, Bentley William E, Ghodssi Reza

机构信息

MEMS Sensors and Actuators Laboratory, Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

出版信息

NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2015 Sep 23;1:15016. doi: 10.1038/npjbiofilms.2015.16. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The use of electric fields in combination with small doses of antibiotics for enhanced treatment of biofilms is termed the 'bioelectric effect' (BE). Different mechanisms of action for the AC and DC fields have been reported in the literature over the last two decades. In this work, we conduct the first study on the correlation between the electrical energy and the treatment efficacy of the bioelectric effect on K-12 W3110 biofilms.

METHODS

A thorough study was performed through the application of alternating (AC), direct (DC) and superimposed (SP) potentials of different amplitudes on mature biofilms. The electric fields were applied in combination with the antibiotic gentamicin (10 μg/ml) over a course of 24 h, after the biofilms had matured for 24 h. The biofilms were analysed using the crystal violet assay, the colony-forming unit method and fluorescence microscopy.

RESULTS

Results show that there is no statistical difference in treatment efficacy between the DC-, AC- and SP-based BE treatment of equivalent energies (analysis of variance (ANOVA) >0.05) for voltages <1 V. We also demonstrate that the efficacy of the BE treatment as measured by the crystal violet staining method and colony-forming unit assay is proportional to the electrical energy applied (ANOVA <0.05). We further verify that the treatment efficacy varies linearly with the energy of the BE treatment ( =0.984). Our results thus suggest that the energy of the electrical signal is the primary factor in determining the efficacy of the BE treatment, at potentials less than the media electrolysis voltage.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that the energy of the electrical signal, and not the type of electrical signal (AC or DC or SP), is the key to determine the efficacy of the BE treatment. We anticipate that this observation will pave the way for further understanding of the mechanism of action of the BE treatment method and may open new doors to the use of electric fields in the treatment of bacterial biofilms.

摘要

背景/目的:将电场与小剂量抗生素联合使用以增强生物膜治疗效果的方法被称为“生物电效应”(BE)。在过去二十年中,文献报道了交流(AC)和直流(DC)电场的不同作用机制。在本研究中,我们首次对电能与生物电效应治疗K-12 W3110生物膜的疗效之间的相关性进行了研究。

方法

通过对成熟生物膜施加不同幅度的交流(AC)、直流(DC)和叠加(SP)电位进行了深入研究。在生物膜成熟24小时后,将电场与抗生素庆大霉素(10μg/ml)联合应用24小时。使用结晶紫测定法、菌落形成单位法和荧光显微镜对生物膜进行分析。

结果

结果表明,对于电压<1V的等效能量,基于直流、交流和叠加的生物电效应治疗在疗效上没有统计学差异(方差分析(ANOVA)>0.05)。我们还证明,通过结晶紫染色法和菌落形成单位测定法测得的生物电效应治疗效果与施加的电能成正比(ANOVA<0.05)。我们进一步验证了治疗效果与生物电效应治疗的能量呈线性变化(=0.984)。因此,我们的结果表明,在电位低于培养基电解电压时,电信号的能量是决定生物电效应治疗效果的主要因素。

结论

我们的结果表明,决定生物电效应治疗效果的关键是电信号的能量,而不是电信号的类型(交流、直流或叠加)。我们预计这一观察结果将为进一步理解生物电效应治疗方法的作用机制铺平道路,并可能为电场在细菌生物膜治疗中的应用打开新的大门。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d84e/5515217/f41f38fb0071/npjbiofilms201516-f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验