Shawar Yusra Ribhi, Djellouli Nehla, Akter Kohenour, Payne Will, Kinney Mary, Mwaba Kasonde, Seruwagi Gloria, English Mike, Marchant Tanya, Shiffman Jeremy, Colbourn Tim
Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
School of Advanced International Studies, John Hopkins University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jul 23;4(7):e0001839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001839. eCollection 2024.
The Quality-of-Care Network (QCN) was conceptualized by the World Health Organization (WHO) and other global partners to facilitate learning on and improve quality of care for maternal and newborn health within and across low and middle-income countries. However, there was significant variance in the speed and extent to which QCN formed in the involved countries. This paper investigates the factors that shaped QCN's differential emergence in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda. Drawing on network scholarship, we conducted a replicated case study of the four country cases and triangulated several sources of data, including a document review, observations of national-level and district level meetings, and key informant interviews in each country and at the global level. Thematic coding was performed in NVivo 12. We find that QCN emerged most quickly and robustly in Bangladesh, followed by Ethiopia, then Uganda, and slowest and with least institutionalization in Malawi. Factors connected to the policy environment and network features explained variance in network emergence. With respect to the policy environment, pre-existing resources and initiatives dedicated to maternal and newborn health and quality improvement, strong data and health system capacity, and national commitment to advancing on synergistic goals were crucial drivers to QCN's emergence. With respect to the features of the network itself, the embedding of QCN leadership in powerful agencies with pre-existing coordination structures and trusting relationships with key stakeholders, inclusive network membership, and effective individual national and local leadership were also crucial in explaining QCN's speed and quality of emergence across countries. Studying QCN emergence provides critical insights as to why well-intentioned top-down global health networks may not materialize in some country contexts and have relatively quick uptake in others, and has implications for a network's perceived legitimacy and ultimate effectiveness in producing stated objectives.
医疗质量网络(QCN)是由世界卫生组织(WHO)和其他全球合作伙伴提出的概念,旨在促进低收入和中等收入国家内部及相互之间在孕产妇和新生儿健康护理方面的学习并提高护理质量。然而,QCN在相关国家形成的速度和程度存在显著差异。本文调查了影响QCN在孟加拉国、埃塞俄比亚、马拉维和乌干达不同出现情况的因素。借鉴网络学术研究,我们对这四个国家的案例进行了重复案例研究,并对多种数据来源进行了三角测量,包括文件审查、对国家层面和地区层面会议的观察,以及在每个国家和全球层面进行的关键信息提供者访谈。在NVivo 12中进行了主题编码。我们发现,QCN在孟加拉国出现得最快且最为稳固,其次是埃塞俄比亚,然后是乌干达,在马拉维出现得最慢且制度化程度最低。与政策环境和网络特征相关的因素解释了网络出现情况的差异。在政策环境方面,先前存在的致力于孕产妇和新生儿健康及质量改进的资源和举措、强大的数据和卫生系统能力,以及国家对推进协同目标的承诺是QCN出现的关键驱动因素。在网络本身的特征方面,将QCN领导层嵌入具有先前协调结构且与关键利益相关者有信任关系的强大机构、包容性的网络成员资格,以及有效的国家和地方个人领导力,对于解释QCN在各国出现的速度和质量也至关重要。研究QCN的出现为理解为何善意的自上而下的全球卫生网络在某些国家背景下可能无法实现,而在其他国家却能较快被采用提供了关键见解,并对网络的感知合法性及其实现既定目标的最终有效性具有启示意义。