Djellouli Nehla, Shawar Yusra Ribhi, Mwaba Kasonde, Akter Kohenour, Seruwagi Gloria, Tufa Asebe Amenu, Gonfa Geremew, Mwandira Kondwani, Kyamulabi Agnes, Shiffman Jeremy, English Mike, Colbourn Tim
Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Bloomberg School of Public Health, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Mar 4;4(3):e0001751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001751. eCollection 2024.
The Network for Improving Quality of Care for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (QCN) aims to work through learning, action, leadership and accountability. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of QCN in these four areas at the global level and in four QCN countries: Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi and Uganda. This mixed method evaluation comprised 2-4 iterative rounds of data collection between 2019-2022, involving stakeholder interviews, hospital observations, QCN members survey, and document review. Qualitative data was analysed using a coding framework developed from underlying theories on network effectiveness, behaviour change, and QCN proposed theory of change. Survey data capturing respondents' perception of QCN was analysed with descriptive statistics. The QCN global level, led by the WHO secretariat, was effective in bringing together network countries' governments and global actors via providing online and in-person platforms for communication and learning. In-country, various interventions were delivered in 'learning districts', however often separately by different partners in different locations, and pandemic-disrupted. Governance structures for quality of care were set-up, some preceding QCN, and were found to be stronger and better (though often externally) resourced at national than local levels. Awareness of operational plans and network activities differed between countries, was lower at local than national levels, but increased from 2019 to 2022. Engagement with, and value of, QCN was perceived to be higher in Uganda and Bangladesh than in Malawi or Ethiopia. Capacity building efforts were implemented in all countries-yet often dependent on implementing partners and donors. QCN stakeholders agreed 15 core monitoring indicators though data collection was challenging, especially for indicators requiring new or parallel systems. Accountability initiatives remained nascent in 2022. Global and national leadership elements of QCN have been most effective to date, with action, learning and accountability more challenging, partner or donor dependent, remaining to be scaled-up, and pandemic-disrupted.
改善孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康护理质量网络(QCN)旨在通过学习、行动、领导力和问责制开展工作。我们旨在评估QCN在全球层面以及四个QCN国家(孟加拉国、埃塞俄比亚、马拉维和乌干达)这四个领域的有效性。这种混合方法评估在2019年至2022年期间进行了2至4轮迭代数据收集,包括利益相关者访谈、医院观察、QCN成员调查和文件审查。定性数据使用基于网络有效性、行为改变和QCN提出的变革理论的基础理论开发的编码框架进行分析。捕捉受访者对QCN看法的调查数据采用描述性统计进行分析。由世卫组织秘书处牵头的QCN全球层面,通过提供在线和面对面的交流与学习平台,有效地将网络国家的政府和全球行为者聚集在一起。在国内,各种干预措施在“学习区”实施,但往往由不同地点的不同伙伴分别实施,且受到疫情干扰。建立了护理质量治理结构,其中一些在QCN之前就已存在,并且发现国家层面的治理结构比地方层面更强,资源也更好(尽管通常是外部资源)。各国对运营计划和网络活动的认识存在差异,地方层面低于国家层面,但从2019年到2022年有所增加。乌干达和孟加拉国对QCN的参与度和价值的认知高于马拉维或埃塞俄比亚。所有国家都开展了能力建设工作,但往往依赖于实施伙伴和捐助者。QCN利益相关者商定了15项核心监测指标,不过数据收集具有挑战性,特别是对于需要新系统或并行系统的指标。问责举措在2022年仍处于初期阶段。迄今为止,QCN的全球和国家领导要素最为有效,而行动、学习和问责则更具挑战性,依赖于伙伴或捐助者,仍有待扩大规模,且受到疫情干扰。