Pawaskar Manjiri, Witt Edward A, Supina Dylan, Herman Barry K, Wadden Thomas A
Formerly of Shire, Lexington, MA.
Formerly of Kantar Health, Princeton, NJ.
Int J Clin Pract. 2017 Jul;71(7). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12970.
This study compared functioning and productivity in individuals meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) diagnostic criteria for binge eating disorder (BED) to those without BED.
A sample of US adults from the National Health and Wellness Survey completed an Internet survey in October 2013. In addition to BED diagnostic criteria, the survey assessed functional impairment and productivity, respectively, using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire. Differences between BED and non-BED respondents were assessed using multivariate models controlling for factors, including age, sex and comorbidities.
Of 22 397 respondents, 344 were categorised as BED respondents and 20 437 as non-BED respondents. Compared with non-BED respondents, BED respondents exhibited significantly (all P<.001) greater functional impairment on the SDS, as measured by mean±SD total (14.04±9.46 vs 3.41±6.36), work/school (3.86±3.62 vs 1.01±2.21), social life/leisure activities (5.29±3.49 vs 1.22±2.33) and family life/home responsibilities (4.89±3.44 vs 1.18±2.26) scores. Adjusted odds ratios (95% CIs) indicated that BED respondents were more impaired than non-BED respondents on the work/school (4.24 [3.33-5.40]), social life/leisure activities (6.37 [4.97-8.15]) and family life/home responsibilities (5.76 [4.51-7.34]) domains of the SDS. On the WPAI, BED respondents reported significantly (all P<.001) higher percentages (mean±SD) of absenteeism (9.59%±19.97% vs 2.90%±12.95%), presenteeism (30.00%±31.64% vs 10.86%±20.07%), work productivity loss (33.19%±33.85% vs 12.60%±23.22%) and activity impairment (43.52%±34.36% vs 19.94%±27.22%) than non-BED respondents.
The findings suggest individuals with BED experience considerable impairment in functioning and work productivity compared with individuals without BED.
本研究比较了符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM - 5)暴食症(BED)诊断标准的个体与无BED个体的功能和生产力情况。
来自美国国家健康与 wellness 调查的成年样本于2013年10月完成了一项网络调查。除了BED诊断标准外,该调查分别使用希恩残疾量表(SDS)和工作生产力与活动损害(WPAI)问卷评估功能损害和生产力。使用控制年龄、性别和共病等因素的多变量模型评估BED和非BED受访者之间的差异。
在22397名受访者中,344人被归类为BED受访者,20437人被归类为非BED受访者。与非BED受访者相比,BED受访者在SDS上表现出显著更高的功能损害(所有P <.001),以均值±标准差计算,总分(14.04±9.46对3.41±6.36)、工作/学校(3.86±3.62对1.01±2.21)、社交生活/休闲活动(5.29±3.49对1.22±2.33)和家庭生活/家庭责任(4.89±3.44对1.18±2.26)得分。调整后的优势比(95%置信区间)表明,BED受访者在SDS的工作/学校(4.24 [3.33 - 5.40])、社交生活/休闲活动(6.37 [4.97 - 8.15])和家庭生活/家庭责任(5.76 [4.51 - 7.34])领域比非BED受访者受损更严重。在WPAI上,BED受访者报告旷工率(9.59%±19.97%对2.90%±12.95%)、出勤主义(30.00%±31.64%对10.86%±20.07%)、工作生产力损失(33.19%±33.85%对12.60%±23.22%)和活动损害(43.52%±34.36%对19.94%±27.22%)显著高于非BED受访者(所有P <.001)。
研究结果表明,与无BED的个体相比,患有BED的个体在功能和工作生产力方面经历了相当大的损害。