Suppr超能文献

对于高度移位的颈椎间盘突出症,前路椎间盘切除术仍可作为椎体次全切除术的替代方案。

Anterior discectomy could still be an alternative to corpectomy in highly migrated cervical disc herniation.

作者信息

Wang Yu, Qian Yunfan, Wang Jing, Zhu Minyu, Wang Jianhong, Teng Honglin

机构信息

a Department of Spine Surgery , First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou , PR China.

b Department of Orthopedics , Yuhuan County People's Hospital , Taizhou , PR China.

出版信息

Br J Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;31(6):709-713. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2017.1348487. Epub 2017 Jul 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

For cases of cervical disc herniation, highly migrated cervical disc (HMCD) is clinically rare and usually treated with anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). This study aims to analyze the feasibility of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the patients with HMCD.

METHOD

Clinical data of 32 patients with HMCD treated with ACDF or ACCF were retrospectively reviewed. Migration distances of the disc prolapses were measured. The mJOA score was used to evaluate surgical effect.

RESULTS

ACDF was successful in 27 patients while ACCF was used for the remaining 5 because of epidural disc prolapse adhesion or unreachable migrated fragments. Complete spinal cord decompression without residual disc fragments was observed in postoperative MRI of all cases. The mean migration distance of the disc prolapses in ACDF group was 7.3 mm, comparing to 11.4 mm in ACCF group. No disc prolapse in ACDF group exceeded the axial length of the vertebral bodies while three of five in ACCF group did. Preoperative mean mJOA scores in ACDF group and ACCF group were 8.20 ± 2.75 and 6.10 ± 2.15, respectively. Postoperative mean mJOA scores in those two groups were significantly improved to 14.70 ± 1.55 (p < .001) and 12.80 ± 1.72 (p < .001), with an improvement rate of 72.80 ± 4.76% and 62.90 ± 9.46%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ACDF is feasible for patients with HMCD except for cases of epidural disc prolapse adhesion or huge disc prolapse which migrates over the axial length of the vertebral body. Clinical symptoms can be significantly improved with few serious complications in those patients including ones underwent alternative ACCF due to a failed ACDF.

摘要

目的

在颈椎间盘突出症病例中,高度移位颈椎间盘(HMCD)临床少见,通常采用颈椎前路椎体次全切除融合术(ACCF)治疗。本研究旨在分析颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)治疗HMCD患者的可行性。

方法

回顾性分析32例行ACDF或ACCF治疗的HMCD患者的临床资料。测量椎间盘突出的移位距离。采用改良日本骨科学会(mJOA)评分评估手术效果。

结果

27例患者ACDF手术成功,其余5例因硬膜外椎间盘突出粘连或移位碎片无法到达而采用ACCF。所有病例术后MRI均显示脊髓完全减压,无残留椎间盘碎片。ACDF组椎间盘突出的平均移位距离为7.3mm,ACCF组为11.4mm。ACDF组无椎间盘突出超过椎体轴向长度,而ACCF组5例中有3例超过。ACDF组和ACCF组术前平均mJOA评分分别为8.20±2.75和6.10±2.15。两组术后平均mJOA评分均显著提高至14.70±1.55(p<0.001)和12.80±1.72(p<0.001),改善率分别为72.80±4.76%和62.90±9.46%。

结论

除硬膜外椎间盘突出粘连或巨大椎间盘突出超过椎体轴向长度的病例外,ACDF治疗HMCD患者是可行的。这些患者的临床症状可显著改善,严重并发症较少,包括因ACDF失败而接受ACCF替代手术的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验