Ramakrishnan Anurekha, Webb K Michael, Cowperthwaite Matthew C
NeuroTexas Institute Research Foundation, Austin; and.
Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Texas.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Oct;27(4):391-396. doi: 10.3171/2017.2.SPINE16760. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
OBJECTIVE The authors comprehensively studied the recovery course and 1-year outcomes of early-crossover patients who were randomized to the nonoperative care arm of the Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study. The primary goal was to gain insight into the differences in the recovery patterns of early-crossover patients and those treated nonoperatively; secondary goals were to identify predictors of good 1-year outcomes, and to understand when and why patients were likely to cross over. METHODS Individual EuroQol-5D scores were obtained at baseline and at 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 38, and 52 weeks for 142 patients. Early-crossover patients were defined as those electing to undergo surgery during the first 12 weeks of treatment. Crossover and noncrossover groups were compared using Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, and chi-square tests. Linear mixed-effects models were used to examine the growth trajectories of crossover and noncrossover groups. Recursive partitioning trees were used to model crossover events and the timing of crossover decisions. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of good 1-year outcomes. RESULTS Of the 142 patients randomized to receive prolonged nonoperative care, 136 were selected for the study. In this cohort, 43/136 (32%) opted for surgery, and 31/43 (72%) of crossover events occurred before the 12-week time point. Early-crossover patients had significantly greater functional impairment at Week 2 than noncrossover patients (p = 0.031), but experienced greater recovery by 26 weeks and better 1-year outcomes (p = 0.045). Patients who did not experience an improvement in their symptoms between 2 and 8 weeks were more likely to cross over (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2-10.1; p = 0.01). Recursive partitioning trees were able to identify crossover patients with 76% accuracy. Regression models suggested that better recovery at 26 weeks (p < 0.01) was predictive of good 1-year outcome; declining health status between Weeks 4 and 8 was negatively predictive of good outcome (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS This study is the first to comprehensively analyze the recovery and outcomes of crossover patients, and compare them to nonoperatively treated patients. The results suggest that patients who have a low EuroQol-5D score during the early weeks of treatment and who do not respond to nonoperative care during the first few weeks of treatment are most likely to cross over. Early-crossover patients experience a greater rate of recovery and more frequently have a good 1-year outcome when compared with nonoperatively treated patients. The current results motivate a broader investigation into the timing of surgery and the identification of patient populations that will be most benefited by early surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation.
目的 作者全面研究了早期交叉患者的康复过程及1年预后情况,这些患者被随机分配至莱顿 - 海牙脊柱干预预后研究的非手术治疗组。主要目标是深入了解早期交叉患者与非手术治疗患者康复模式的差异;次要目标是确定1年良好预后的预测因素,并了解患者何时以及为何可能会选择交叉治疗(即转为手术治疗)。方法 对142例患者在基线以及第2、4、8、12、26、38和52周时获取个体欧洲五维健康量表(EuroQol - 5D)评分。早期交叉患者定义为在治疗的前12周内选择接受手术的患者。使用Kruskal - Wallis检验、Wilcoxon - Mann - Whitney检验和卡方检验对交叉组和非交叉组进行比较。采用线性混合效应模型来研究交叉组和非交叉组的康复轨迹。使用递归划分树对交叉事件及交叉决策的时间进行建模。采用多变量逻辑回归模型确定1年良好预后的预测因素。结果 在142例被随机分配接受长期非手术治疗的患者中,136例被选入本研究。在该队列中,43/136(32%)选择了手术治疗,且31/43(72%)的交叉事件发生在12周时间点之前。早期交叉患者在第2周时的功能障碍明显比非交叉患者更严重(p = 0.031),但到26周时恢复程度更大,且1年预后更好(p = 0.045)。在第2至8周期间症状未改善的患者更有可能选择交叉治疗(比值比3.5,95%置信区间1.2 - 10.1;p = 0.01)。递归划分树能够以76%的准确率识别交叉患者。回归模型表明,26周时恢复较好(p < 0.01)可预测1年良好预后;第4至8周期间健康状况下降对良好预后具有负向预测作用(p < 0.01)。结论 本研究首次全面分析了交叉患者的康复情况及预后,并将其与非手术治疗患者进行比较。结果表明,在治疗早期欧洲五维健康量表(EuroQol - 5D)评分较低且在治疗最初几周对非手术治疗无反应的患者最有可能选择交叉治疗。与非手术治疗患者相比,早期交叉患者的恢复速度更快,且1年良好预后的情况更常见。当前结果促使对手术时机以及确定哪些患者群体将从腰椎间盘突出症的早期手术治疗中获益最多进行更广泛的研究。