Martin-Ortega Julia, Glenk Klaus, Byg Anja
Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds. Leeds, United Kingdom.
Land Economy Unit, Scottish Rural College. Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 28;12(7):e0181686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181686. eCollection 2017.
Ecosystems degradation represents one of the major global challenges at the present time, threating people's livelihoods and well-being worldwide. Ecosystem restoration therefore seems no longer an option, but an imperative. Restoration challenges are such that a dialogue has begun on the need to re-shape restoration as a science. A critical aspect of that reshaping process is the acceptance that restoration science and practice needs to be coupled with socio-economic research and public engagement. This inescapably means conveying complex ecosystem's information in a way that is accessible to the wider public. In this paper we take up this challenge with the ultimate aim of contributing to making a step change in science's contribution to ecosystems restoration practice. Using peatlands as a paradigmatically complex ecosystem, we put in place a transdisciplinary process to articulate a description of the processes and outcomes of restoration that can be understood widely by the public. We provide evidence of the usefulness of the process and tools in addressing four key challenges relevant to restoration of any complex ecosystem: (1) how to represent restoration outcomes; (2) how to establish a restoration reference; (3) how to cope with varying restoration time-lags and (4) how to define spatial units for restoration. This evidence includes the way the process resulted in the creation of materials that are now being used by restoration practitioners for communication with the public and in other research contexts. Our main contribution is of an epistemological nature: while ecosystem services-based approaches have enhanced the integration of academic disciplines and non-specialist knowledge, this has so far only followed one direction (from the biophysical underpinning to the description of ecosystem services and their appreciation by the public). We propose that it is the mix of approaches and epistemological directions (including from the public to the biophysical parameters) what will make a definitive contribution to restoration practice.
生态系统退化是当前全球面临的主要挑战之一,威胁着全世界人民的生计和福祉。因此,生态系统恢复似乎不再是一个选项,而是一项紧迫任务。恢复工作面临诸多挑战,以至于人们已经开始讨论是否需要将恢复工作重塑为一门科学。这一重塑过程的一个关键方面是承认恢复科学与实践需要与社会经济研究及公众参与相结合。这不可避免地意味着要以更广泛公众能够理解的方式传达复杂的生态系统信息。在本文中,我们迎接这一挑战,最终目标是推动科学对生态系统恢复实践的贡献实现重大转变。我们以泥炭地作为典型的复杂生态系统,开展了一个跨学科过程,以阐明一种恢复过程和结果的描述,使其能被公众广泛理解。我们提供了该过程和工具在应对与任何复杂生态系统恢复相关的四个关键挑战方面有用性的证据:(1)如何呈现恢复结果;(2)如何建立恢复参照;(3)如何应对不同的恢复时间滞后;(4)如何定义恢复的空间单元。这一证据包括该过程如何导致创建了一些材料,这些材料目前正被恢复从业者用于与公众沟通以及其他研究背景中。我们的主要贡献具有认识论性质:虽然基于生态系统服务的方法增强了学术学科与非专业知识的整合,但到目前为止这仅遵循了一个方向(从生物物理基础到生态系统服务的描述及其被公众认知)。我们提出,正是方法和认识论方向的混合(包括从公众到生物物理参数)将对恢复实践做出决定性贡献。