• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

立体显微镜评估四种不同根管封闭剂的密封能力：一项体外研究。

Stereomicroscopic evaluation of sealing ability of four different root canal sealers: an in-vitro study.

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontic Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Research Centre Moradabad, Moradabad, UP, India.

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Kalka Dental College and Hospital, Meerut, UP, India.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 20;24(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03913-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-03913-7
PMID:38378554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10877889/
Abstract

AIM

To compare and evaluate the sealing ability of four different commercially available sealers to provide seal against the dye penetration test using a stereomicroscope-an in-vitro study.

MATERIAL/METHOD: 80 extracted single rooted mandibular premolar with single canal were used in this study. The samples were divided in 4 groups (20 in each) based on sealer. Group I (Diaproseal), Group II (apexit Plus), Group III (MTA Fillapex) and Group IV (Bio-C). The samples were analyzed using a stereomicroscope and data analysis was done with one-way Anova And post hoc Tukey's test.

RESULT

The mean dye penetration score was 1.2400 ± 0.778 mm for Group I. 2.6000 ± 0.897 mm for Group II, 4.2000 ± 0.923 mm for Group III and 4.225 ± 2.055 mm for Group IV. One-way Anova analysis shows that intergroup comparison was statistically significant between the four groups. The post hoc Tukey's test reveals that the difference was statistically non-significant between group III and group IV.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that between the four groups the Group I (Diaproseal) showed the least dye penetration followed by Group II (Apexit Pus), Group III (MTA Fillapex) and then Group IV (Bio-C), where there was no significant difference between the Group III (MTA Fillapex) and Group IV (Bio-C).

摘要

目的

通过立体显微镜下的染料渗透试验比较和评估四种不同市售封闭剂的封闭能力——一项体外研究。

材料/方法：本研究共使用 80 颗下颌单根前磨牙，均为单根管。根据封闭剂的不同，将样本分为 4 组（每组 20 个）。第 I 组（Diaproseal）、第 II 组（apexit Plus）、第 III 组（MTA Fillapex）和第 IV 组（Bio-C）。使用立体显微镜对样本进行分析，并采用单因素方差分析和事后 Tukey 检验进行数据分析。

结果

第 I 组的平均染料渗透评分 1.2400 ± 0.778mm；第 II 组为 2.6000 ± 0.897mm；第 III 组为 4.2000 ± 0.923mm；第 IV 组为 4.225 ± 2.055mm。单因素方差分析显示，四组间的组间比较具有统计学意义。事后 Tukey 检验显示，第 III 组和第 IV 组之间的差异无统计学意义。

结论

在这 4 组中，第 I 组（Diaproseal）显示出最小的染料渗透，其次是第 II 组（Apexit Plus）、第 III 组（MTA Fillapex）和第 IV 组（Bio-C），第 III 组（MTA Fillapex）和第 IV 组（Bio-C）之间无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76b/10877889/e3c90e4d0d07/12903_2024_3913_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76b/10877889/1e2077ff1984/12903_2024_3913_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76b/10877889/ec9d3d3261d5/12903_2024_3913_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76b/10877889/4e89f9c64aa9/12903_2024_3913_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76b/10877889/3883911cba1e/12903_2024_3913_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76b/10877889/dd63073aa24c/12903_2024_3913_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76b/10877889/928abdea845d/12903_2024_3913_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76b/10877889/e3c90e4d0d07/12903_2024_3913_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76b/10877889/1e2077ff1984/12903_2024_3913_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76b/10877889/ec9d3d3261d5/12903_2024_3913_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76b/10877889/4e89f9c64aa9/12903_2024_3913_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76b/10877889/3883911cba1e/12903_2024_3913_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76b/10877889/dd63073aa24c/12903_2024_3913_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76b/10877889/928abdea845d/12903_2024_3913_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a76b/10877889/e3c90e4d0d07/12903_2024_3913_Figa_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Stereomicroscopic evaluation of sealing ability of four different root canal sealers: an in-vitro study.立体显微镜评估四种不同根管封闭剂的密封能力：一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 20;24(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03913-7.
2
A Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of New MTA Based Sealers with Conventional Resin Based Sealer: An In-vitro Study.新型基于MTA的封闭剂与传统树脂基封闭剂封闭能力的比较评估：一项体外研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jul;10(7):ZC76-9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18909.8194. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
3
Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Three Root Canal Sealers: An Study.三种根管封闭剂封闭能力的评估：一项研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Mar 1;21(3):291-295.
4
Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Obturated with Different Root Canal Sealers (A Comparative Study).使用不同根管封闭剂充填的根管治疗后牙齿的抗折性（一项对比研究）
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 May 1;21(5):490-493.
5
Comparative Evaluation of the Sealing Ability of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)-Based, Resin-Based, and Zinc Oxide Eugenol Root Canal Sealers: An In Vitro Study.基于三氧化矿物凝聚体（MTA）、树脂和氧化锌丁香酚根管封闭剂封闭能力的比较评价：一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2024 Jan 13;16(1):e52201. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52201. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
Comparative evaluation of retreatability of calcium silicate-based root canal sealers and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers in curved canals-An micro-CT analysis.基于钙硅酸钠的根管封闭剂和基于环氧树脂的根管封闭剂在弯曲根管中可退缩性的比较评价——micro-CT 分析。
Indian J Dent Res. 2021 Jan-Feb;32(1):79-86. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_328_20.
7
Assessment of Marginal Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Root Canal Sealers: An in vitro Study.根管封闭剂边缘适应性和封闭能力的评估：一项体外研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Dec 1;18(12):1130-1134. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2188.
8
The Effect of Primary Root Canal Treatment on Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Calcium Silicate-based Sealers during Endodontic Retreatment.根管再治疗期间一次根管治疗对硅酸钙类封闭剂牙本质小管渗透的影响
J Endod. 2022 Sep;48(9):1169-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
9
The effect of four different intracanal medicaments on the push-out bond strength of root canal sealers.四种根管内药物对根管封闭剂推出强度的影响。
J Med Life. 2022 Apr;15(4):448-453. doi: 10.25122/jml-2020-0104.
10
Effect of double antibiotic and calcium hydroxide pastes on dislodgement resistance of an epoxy resin-based and two calcium silicate-based root canal sealers.双抗生素糊剂和氢氧化钙糊剂对一种环氧树脂类及两种硅酸钙类根管封闭剂抗脱位性的影响
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 May;21(4):1277-1282. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1877-1. Epub 2016 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of ultrasonic-assisted iRoot SP single-cone technique on root canal filling efficacy: an in vitro study.超声辅助iRoot SP单尖法对根管充填效果的影响：一项体外研究
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Jun 15;17(6):4375-4386. doi: 10.62347/WAIK7340. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Children oral health and parents education status: a cross sectional study.儿童口腔健康与家长受教育状况：一项横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 24;23(1):787. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03424-x.
2
Instantaneous dental implant loading technique by fixed dentures: A retrospective cohort study.固定义齿即刻牙种植加载技术：一项回顾性队列研究。
Dent Med Probl. 2023 Jul-Sep;60(3):375-383. doi: 10.17219/dmp/154981.
3
Three-dimensional facial swelling evaluation of pre-operative single-dose of prednisone in third molar surgery: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial.
术前单次泼尼松给药对第三磨牙手术中三维面部肿胀评估的影响：一项随机对照的 split-mouth 试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Aug 31;23(1):614. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03334-y.
4
Online Bruxism-related information: Can people understand what they read? A Cross-Sectional Study.在线磨牙症相关信息：人们能理解他们所读到的内容吗？一项横断面研究。
J Oral Rehabil. 2023 Nov;50(11):1211-1216. doi: 10.1111/joor.13519. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
5
Evaluation of the effectiveness of tube drain on postoperative discomfort in mandibular third molar surgery: prospective randomized split-mouth study.下颌第三磨牙手术中引流管对术后不适影响的有效性评估：前瞻性随机双盲研究。 （注：原文中“split-mouth”一般翻译为“双盲”，但这里似乎更准确的是“双侧对照”，按照更符合语境的意思翻译了。如果按照“双盲”翻译，和整体语境不太契合。） 正确译文：下颌第三磨牙手术中引流管对术后不适影响的有效性评估：前瞻性随机双侧对照研究。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2023 Oct;81(7):528-533. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2023.2205934. Epub 2023 May 13.
6
Mandibular condylar hyperplasia and its correlation with vascular endothelial growth factor.下颌骨髁突增生及其与血管内皮生长因子的相关性。
J Oral Rehabil. 2023 Sep;50(9):845-851. doi: 10.1111/joor.13487. Epub 2023 May 18.
7
Stable cranial parameters to evaluate the occlusal plane orientation in the frontal plane: a systematic review.评估额状面中咬合平面方向的稳定颅参数：系统评价。
Minerva Dent Oral Sci. 2023 Aug;72(4):185-194. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6329.22.04659-9. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
8
Bioactive Compound-Based Formulations: New Perspectives for the Management of Orofacial Pain.基于生物活性化合物的配方：口腔颌面部疼痛管理的新视角。
Molecules. 2022 Dec 23;28(1):106. doi: 10.3390/molecules28010106.
9
Comparison of pain perception between computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery and the conventional syringe for inferior alveolar nerve block in children.儿童下牙槽神经阻滞中计算机控制局部麻醉药注射与传统注射器的疼痛感知比较。
Dent Med Probl. 2022 Oct-Dec;59(4):523-529. doi: 10.17219/dmp/135897.
10
Influence of dentofacial characteristics on the appearance of self-reported bullying: A review.牙颌面特征对自我报告欺凌行为外观的影响：综述。
Dent Med Probl. 2022 Oct-Dec;59(4):657-661. doi: 10.17219/dmp/138636.