Gokuldoss Prashanth Konda, Kolla Sri, Eckert Jürgen
Department of Manufacturing and Civil Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Teknologivegen 22, 2815 Gjøvik, Norway.
Erich Schmid Institute of Materials Science, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Jahnstraße 12, 8700 Leoben, Austria.
Materials (Basel). 2017 Jun 19;10(6):672. doi: 10.3390/ma10060672.
Additive manufacturing (AM), also known as 3D printing or rapid prototyping, is gaining increasing attention due to its ability to produce parts with added functionality and increased complexities in geometrical design, on top of the fact that it is theoretically possible to produce any shape without limitations. However, most of the research on additive manufacturing techniques are focused on the development of materials/process parameters/products design with different additive manufacturing processes such as selective laser melting, electron beam melting, or binder jetting. However, we do not have any guidelines that discuss the selection of the most suitable additive manufacturing process, depending on the material to be processed, the complexity of the parts to be produced, or the design considerations. Considering the very fact that no reports deal with this process selection, the present manuscript aims to discuss the different selection criteria that are to be considered, in order to select the best AM process (binder jetting/selective laser melting/electron beam melting) for fabricating a specific component with a defined set of material properties.
增材制造(AM),也被称为3D打印或快速成型,正受到越来越多的关注,这是因为它能够生产具有附加功能且几何设计复杂度更高的零件,此外,理论上它可以不受限制地生产任何形状。然而,大多数关于增材制造技术的研究都集中在利用不同的增材制造工艺(如选择性激光熔化、电子束熔化或粘结剂喷射)来开发材料/工艺参数/产品设计。然而,我们没有任何指南来讨论根据待加工材料、待生产零件的复杂度或设计考量来选择最合适的增材制造工艺。鉴于尚无报告涉及这一工艺选择问题,本手稿旨在讨论在为制造具有特定材料性能的特定部件选择最佳增材制造工艺(粘结剂喷射/选择性激光熔化/电子束熔化)时应考虑的不同选择标准。