Schatz Christine, Strickstrock Monika, Roos Malgorzata, Edelhoff Daniel, Eichberger Marlis, Zylla Isabella-Maria, Stawarczyk Bogna
Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Goethestrasse 70, Munich 80336, Germany.
Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Material Science and Analysis, University of Applied Sciences, Hochschule Osnabrück, Albrechtstrasse 30, Osnabrück 49076, Germany.
Materials (Basel). 2016 Mar 9;9(3):180. doi: 10.3390/ma9030180.
The aim of this work was to evaluate the influence of specimen preparation and test method on the flexural strength results of monolithic zirconia. Different monolithic zirconia materials (Ceramill Zolid (Amann Girrbach, Koblach, Austria), Zenostar ZrTranslucent (Wieland Dental, Pforzheim, Germany), and DD Bio zx² (Dental Direkt, Spenge, Germany)) were tested with three different methods: 3-point, 4-point, and biaxial flexural strength. Additionally, different specimen preparation methods were applied: either dry polishing before sintering or wet polishing after sintering. Each subgroup included 40 specimens. The surface roughness was assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and a profilometer whereas monoclinic phase transformation was investigated with X-ray diffraction. The data were analyzed using a three-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with respect to the three factors: zirconia, specimen preparation, and test method. One-way ANOVA was conducted for the test method and zirconia factors within the combination of two other factors. A 2-parameter Weibull distribution assumption was applied to analyze the reliability under different testing conditions. In general, values measured using the 4-point test method presented the lowest flexural strength values. The flexural strength findings can be grouped in the following order: 4-point < 3-point < biaxial. Specimens prepared after sintering showed significantly higher flexural strength values than prepared before sintering. The Weibull moduli ranged from 5.1 to 16.5. Specimens polished before sintering showed higher surface roughness values than specimens polished after sintering. In contrast, no strong impact of the polishing procedures on the monoclinic surface layer was observed. No impact of zirconia material on flexural strength was found. The test method and the preparation method significantly influenced the flexural strength values.
本研究旨在评估试样制备和测试方法对整体式氧化锆弯曲强度结果的影响。采用三种不同方法对不同的整体式氧化锆材料(Ceramill Zolid(阿曼·吉尔巴赫公司,奥地利科布拉克)、Zenostar ZrTranslucent(德国维兰德牙科公司,普福尔茨海姆)和DD Bio zx²(德国牙科直接公司,施彭格))进行测试:三点弯曲、四点弯曲和双轴弯曲强度测试。此外,还采用了不同的试样制备方法:烧结前干抛光或烧结后湿抛光。每个亚组包含40个试样。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和轮廓仪评估表面粗糙度,同时用X射线衍射研究单斜相转变。针对氧化锆、试样制备和测试方法这三个因素,采用三因素方差分析(ANOVA)对数据进行分析。在另外两个因素的组合中,对测试方法和氧化锆因素进行单因素方差分析。应用两参数威布尔分布假设来分析不同测试条件下的可靠性。一般来说,采用四点测试法测得的值呈现出最低的弯曲强度值。弯曲强度结果可按以下顺序分组:四点弯曲<三点弯曲<双轴弯曲。烧结后制备的试样显示出比烧结前制备的试样显著更高的弯曲强度值。威布尔模量范围为5.1至16.5。烧结前抛光的试样比烧结后抛光的试样具有更高的表面粗糙度值。相比之下,未观察到抛光程序对单斜表面层有强烈影响。未发现氧化锆材料对弯曲强度有影响。测试方法和制备方法对弯曲强度值有显著影响。