Kissi Ama, Hughes Sean, Mertens Gaëtan, Barnes-Holmes Dermot, De Houwer Jan, Crombez Geert
1 Ghent University, Belgium.
2 University of Bath, UK.
Behav Modif. 2017 Sep;41(5):683-707. doi: 10.1177/0145445517693811. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
Within relational frame theory, a distinction has been made between three types of rule-governed behavior known as pliance, tracking, and augmenting. This review examined whether there is support for the concepts of pliance, tracking, and augmenting in the experimental analysis of behavior; whether these concepts refer to distinct functional classes of behavior; and how these concepts have been operationalized in experimental (behavioral-analytic) research. Given that the concepts of pliance, tracking, and augmenting were first defined by Zettle and Hayes, we confined our review to studies published in or after 1982. Our results indicate that (a) experimental research investigating pliance, tracking, and/or augmenting is extremely limited; (b) it is difficult to determine the extent to which the concepts of pliance, tracking, and augmenting allow for relatively precise experimental analyses of distinct functional classes of behavior; and
在关系框架理论中，人们对三种受规则支配的行为类型进行了区分，即依从、追踪和增强。本综述考察了在行为实验分析中是否支持依从、追踪和增强的概念；这些概念是否指不同的行为功能类别；以及这些概念在实验（行为分析）研究中是如何操作化的。鉴于依从、追踪和增强的概念最初是由泽特尔和海斯定义的，我们将综述范围限定在1982年或之后发表的研究。我们的结果表明：（a）调查依从、追踪和/或增强的实验研究极其有限；（b）很难确定依从、追踪和增强的概念在多大程度上允许对不同的行为功能类别进行相对精确的实验分析；以及
