• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

波兰语版规则导向行为测量工具:普适顺应性问卷、普适追踪问卷和普适自我顺应性问卷。

The Polish adaptation of the measurements of rule-governed behaviors: Generalized Pliance Questionnaire, Generalized Tracking Questionnaire and Generalized Self-Pliance Questionnaire.

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology in Warsaw, Center for Behavioral Research in Decision Making, SWPS University, Warsaw, Poland.

Advanced Clinical Studies and Therapy Excellence Center, Institute of Psychology, SWPS University, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Apr 5;18(4):e0283795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283795. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0283795
PMID:37018282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10075470/
Abstract

In some circumstances rule-governed behavior, a behavior that is governed by verbal rules instead of environmental consequences, may be beneficial for human beings. At the same time, rigid rule following is associated with psychopathology. Thus measurement of rule-governed behavior may be of special use in a clinical setting. The aim of this paper is to assess the psychometric properties of Polish adaptations of three questionnaires measuring generalized tendency to engage in various types of rule-governed behaviors: Generalized Pliance Questionnaire (GPQ), Generalized Self-Pliance Questionnaire (GSPQ), Generalized Tracking Questionnaire (GTQ). A forward-backward method was used for translation. Data was collected from two samples: general population (N = 669) and university students (N = 451). To measure the validity of the adapted scales the participants filled in a set of self-assessed questionnaires: Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale- 21 (DASS-21), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II), Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ), Valuing Questionnaire (VQ) and Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire (RRQ). The exploratory and confirmatory analyses confirmed the unidimensional structure of each of the adapted scales. All of those scales presented good reliability (internal consistency measured with Cronbach Alpha) and item-total correlations. The Polish versions of questionnaires presented significant correlations in the expected directions with relevant psychological variables in line with the original studies. The measurement occurred invariant across both samples as well as gender. The results provide evidence that Polish versions of GPQ, GSPQ and GTQ present sufficient validity and reliability to be used in the Polish-speaking population.

摘要

在某些情况下,受规则支配的行为——一种受言语规则而非环境后果支配的行为——可能对人类有益。同时,僵化的规则遵循与精神病理学有关。因此,规则支配行为的测量在临床环境中可能具有特殊用途。本文的目的是评估三种测量各种类型规则支配行为倾向的问卷的波兰语适应性的心理测量特性:普遍服从问卷(GPQ)、普遍自我服从问卷(GSPQ)和普遍跟踪问卷(GTQ)。翻译采用了正向-反向法。数据来自两个样本:普通人群(N=669)和大学生(N=451)。为了衡量改编量表的效度,参与者填写了一组自我评估问卷:生活满意度量表(SWLS)、抑郁、焦虑和压力量表-21(DASS-21)、一般自我效能感量表(GSES)、接受与行动问卷-II(AAQ-II)、认知融合问卷(CFQ)、价值观问卷(VQ)和反思问卷(RRQ)。探索性和验证性分析证实了每个改编量表的单维结构。所有这些量表都表现出良好的可靠性(用 Cronbach Alpha 测量的内部一致性)和项目总分相关性。问卷的波兰语版本与原始研究一致,与相关心理变量呈预期方向的显著相关。测量在两个样本以及性别上都是不变的。结果表明,GPQ、GSPQ 和 GTQ 的波兰语版本具有足够的有效性和可靠性,可以在讲波兰语的人群中使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8b/10075470/43a28c760074/pone.0283795.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8b/10075470/7b725c00721d/pone.0283795.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8b/10075470/636b4515f6d3/pone.0283795.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8b/10075470/3e9ab5d53895/pone.0283795.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8b/10075470/43a28c760074/pone.0283795.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8b/10075470/7b725c00721d/pone.0283795.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8b/10075470/636b4515f6d3/pone.0283795.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8b/10075470/3e9ab5d53895/pone.0283795.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e8b/10075470/43a28c760074/pone.0283795.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The Polish adaptation of the measurements of rule-governed behaviors: Generalized Pliance Questionnaire, Generalized Tracking Questionnaire and Generalized Self-Pliance Questionnaire.波兰语版规则导向行为测量工具:普适顺应性问卷、普适追踪问卷和普适自我顺应性问卷。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 5;18(4):e0283795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283795. eCollection 2023.
2
Development and initial validation of the Generalized Tracking Questionnaire.一般追踪问卷的编制与初步验证。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 11;15(6):e0234393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234393. eCollection 2020.
3
Psychometric properties of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire-8 in two Spanish nonclinical samples.自动思维问卷-8在两个西班牙非临床样本中的心理测量特性。
PeerJ. 2020 Sep 16;8:e9747. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9747. eCollection 2020.
4
Psychometric properties of the Valuing Questionnaire in a Spaniard sample and factorial equivalence with a Colombian sample.《价值观问卷在西班牙样本中的心理测量学特性及其与哥伦比亚样本的因子等效性》
PeerJ. 2022 Jan 6;10:e12670. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12670. eCollection 2022.
5
A confirmatory factor analysis for an adapted and validated Polish version of the e.对经过改编和验证的波兰版 e 的确认性因素分析。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2020 Jan 17;33(1):67-76. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01497. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
6
[Evaluation of worry: validation of a French translation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire].[担忧评估:宾夕法尼亚州立大学担忧问卷法语翻译版的效度验证]
Encephale. 2001 Sep-Oct;27(5):475-84.
7
Measurement of psychological inflexibility: an examination of the psychometric properties of the AAQ-3 compared to AAQ-II.心理灵活性的测量:与 AAQ-II 相比,AAQ-3 的心理测量学特性的检验。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Sep 30;11(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01318-9.
8
The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) in the general population: scale structure, reliability, measurement invariance and normative data: a cross-sectional survey.一般人群中的四维症状问卷(4DSQ):量表结构、信度、测量不变性及常模数据:一项横断面调查
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Sep 15;14(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0533-4.
9
Perceived social support and self-efficacy beliefs for healthy eating and physical activity among Arabic-speaking university students: adaptation and implementation of health beliefs survey questionnaire.阿拉伯语大学生对健康饮食和身体活动的感知社会支持和自我效能信念:健康信念调查问卷的改编和实施。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 9;21(1):2054. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12138-0.
10
[Psychometric approach of metacognition: Pilot study in clinical population].[元认知的心理测量方法:临床人群的初步研究]
Encephale. 2017 Apr;43(2):120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between tolerance for uncertainty and academic adjustment: the mediating role of students' psychological flexibility during COVID-19.不确定性容忍度与学业适应的关系:COVID-19期间学生心理灵活性的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 17;14:1272205. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1272205. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Three Versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-42, DASS-21, and DASS-12) in Polish Adults.波兰成年人中抑郁焦虑压力量表三个版本(DASS - 42、DASS - 21和DASS - 12)的验证性因素分析
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 4;12:770532. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.770532. eCollection 2021.
2
Assessing the Quality and Appropriateness of Factor Solutions and Factor Score Estimates in Exploratory Item Factor Analysis.评估探索性项目因子分析中因子解和因子得分估计的质量与适宜性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Oct;78(5):762-780. doi: 10.1177/0013164417719308. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
3
Development and initial validation of the Generalized Tracking Questionnaire.
一般追踪问卷的编制与初步验证。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 11;15(6):e0234393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234393. eCollection 2020.
4
The Effect of Estimation Methods on SEM Fit Indices.估计方法对结构方程模型拟合指数的影响。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Jun;80(3):421-445. doi: 10.1177/0013164419885164. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
5
RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods.结构方程模型中有序分类数据的 RMSEA、CFI 和 TLI:他们讲述的故事取决于估计方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):409-428. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2.
6
A Systematic Review of Pliance, Tracking, and Augmenting.柔韧性、追踪与增强的系统评价
Behav Modif. 2017 Sep;41(5):683-707. doi: 10.1177/0145445517693811. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
7
The Dark-Side of Rule Governed Behavior: An Experimental Analysis of Problematic Rule-Following in an Adolescent Population With Depressive Symptomatology.规则支配行为的阴暗面:对有抑郁症状的青少年群体中问题性规则遵循的实验分析。
Behav Modif. 2014 Jul;38(4):587-613. doi: 10.1177/0145445514521630. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
8
The development and initial validation of the cognitive fusion questionnaire.认知融合问卷的编制与初步验证。
Behav Ther. 2014 Jan;45(1):83-101. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
9
Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance.接纳与行动问卷-II 的初步心理测量特性:修订版的心理灵活性和体验回避度量。
Behav Ther. 2011 Dec;42(4):676-88. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 May 25.
10
Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis.采用平行分析对有序多项条目进行维度评估。
Psychol Methods. 2011 Jun;16(2):209-20. doi: 10.1037/a0023353.