Suppr超能文献

过度嗜睡的主观与客观评估

Subjective and Objective Assessment of Hypersomnolence.

作者信息

Murray Brian James

机构信息

Neurology and Sleep Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Room M1-600, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.

出版信息

Sleep Med Clin. 2017 Sep;12(3):313-322. doi: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 May 13.

Abstract

This article describes clinical approaches to assessing sleepiness. Subjective sleep scales are used in clinical settings but have significant limitations. Likewise, objective tools may have prohibitive expense, and practical administration considerations may prohibit regular use. Gold standard tests include the multiple sleep latency test and maintenance of wakefulness test. These studies are criticized for a variety of reasons but are useful in appropriate clinical context. New tools suggest novel ways to assess sleepiness and will likely be more prominent in clinical assessments over time. This article outlines subjective scales and objective tools and suggests situations where particular instruments may be appropriate.

摘要

本文介绍了评估嗜睡的临床方法。主观睡眠量表在临床环境中使用,但有显著局限性。同样,客观工具可能费用高昂,且实际应用方面的考虑可能会妨碍其常规使用。金标准测试包括多次睡眠潜伏期测试和清醒维持测试。这些研究因各种原因受到批评,但在适当的临床背景下是有用的。新工具提出了评估嗜睡的新方法,随着时间的推移可能会在临床评估中更加突出。本文概述了主观量表和客观工具,并指出了某些特定工具可能适用的情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验