Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal/Child Sciences (DINOGMI), Polyclinic Hospital San Martino IRCCS, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Sleep Breath. 2020 Mar;24(1):37-47. doi: 10.1007/s11325-019-01903-6. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) while driving is a major international public health issue resulting in a more than doubled risk of motor vehicle accidents (MVAs). Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most frequent medical cause of EDS. Therefore, the European Union Directive 2014/85/EU determined that "untreated moderate to severe OSA coincident with EDS constitutes a medical disorder leading to unfitness to drive." The paper aims are to provide a brief review of sleepiness and its implications for driving safety, as well as to describe the subjective and objective methods to accurately evaluate EDS in order to assess fitness to drive in patients with OSA.
We examined databases including PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE using the search terms "sleepiness at the wheel, excessive daytime sleepiness, sleepiness measure, sleep-wake cycle, obstructive sleep apnea, driving license, fitness to drive."
Significant interindividual variability in EDS exists in patients with comparable severity of OSA. Objective methods of measuring EDS are too expensive and time consuming to be suitable for the certification of driving licenses. The reliability of subjective methods depends upon the clinical setting and subjective tools assess only limited aspects of EDS. Objective measures, such as biochemical biomarkers, must, therefore, support subjective methods.
Extensive data have supported different subjective and objective methods for the appraisal of EDS in patients with OSA depending upon the clinical and experimental setting. Challenges remain to determine an appropriate tool for the evaluation of fitness to drive.
驾驶时过度日间嗜睡(EDS)是一个重大的国际公共卫生问题,导致机动车事故(MVA)的风险增加了一倍多。阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是 EDS 的最常见医学原因。因此,欧盟指令 2014/85/EU 规定,“伴有 EDS 的未经治疗的中重度 OSA 构成导致不适宜驾驶的医学疾病。”本文旨在简要回顾嗜睡及其对驾驶安全的影响,并描述准确评估 EDS 的主观和客观方法,以评估 OSA 患者的驾驶能力。
我们使用“车轮上的嗜睡、日间过度嗜睡、嗜睡测量、睡眠-觉醒周期、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停、驾驶执照、驾驶能力”等检索词,检查了 PubMed、Medline 和 EMBASE 等数据库。
在 OSA 严重程度相当的患者中,EDS 存在显著的个体间差异。测量 EDS 的客观方法过于昂贵且耗时,不适合驾驶执照认证。主观方法的可靠性取决于临床环境,并且主观工具仅评估 EDS 的有限方面。因此,必须用客观指标(如生物化学标志物)来支持主观方法。
大量数据支持根据临床和实验环境,使用不同的主观和客观方法来评估 OSA 患者的 EDS。仍然存在确定评估驾驶能力的适当工具的挑战。