Bloom Gerald, Berdou Evangelia, Standing Hilary, Guo Zhilei, Labrique Alain
Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RE, UK.
Independent consultant, Brighton, UK.
Global Health. 2017 Aug 7;13(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0276-y.
The aim of this paper is to contribute to debates about how governments and other stakeholders can influence the application of ICTs to increase access to safe, effective and affordable treatment of common illnesses, especially by the poor. First, it argues that the health sector is best conceptualized as a 'knowledge economy'. This supports a broadened view of health service provision that includes formal and informal arrangements for the provision of medical advice and drugs. This is particularly important in countries with a pluralistic health system, with relatively underdeveloped institutional arrangements. It then argues that reframing the health sector as a knowledge economy allows us to circumvent the blind spots associated with donor-driven ICT-interventions and consider more broadly the forces that are driving e-health innovations. It draws on small case studies in Bangladesh and China to illustrate new types of organization and new kinds of relationship between organizations that are emerging. It argues that several factors have impeded the rapid diffusion of ICT innovations at scale including: the limited capacity of innovations to meet health service needs, the time it takes to build new kinds of partnership between public and private actors and participants in the health and communications sectors and the lack of a supportive regulatory environment. It emphasises the need to understand the political economy of the digital health knowledge economy and the new regulatory challenges likely to emerge. It concludes that governments will need to play a more active role to facilitate the diffusion of beneficial ICT innovations at scale and ensure that the overall pattern of health system development meets the needs of the population, including the poor.
本文旨在为有关政府和其他利益相关者如何影响信息通信技术(ICT)的应用以增加获得常见疾病安全、有效且可负担治疗的机会,尤其是穷人的治疗机会的辩论做出贡献。首先,本文认为卫生部门最好被概念化为一种“知识经济”。这支持了一种更广泛的卫生服务提供观点,其中包括提供医疗建议和药品的正式和非正式安排。这在卫生系统多元化且机构安排相对欠发达的国家尤为重要。接着,本文认为将卫生部门重新概念化为知识经济使我们能够规避与捐助者驱动的ICT干预相关的盲点,并更广泛地考虑推动电子健康创新的力量。本文借鉴了孟加拉国和中国的小型案例研究,以说明正在出现的新型组织以及组织之间的新型关系。本文认为有几个因素阻碍了ICT创新大规模快速传播,包括:创新满足卫生服务需求的能力有限、公共和私营行为体以及卫生与通信部门参与者建立新型伙伴关系所需的时间,以及缺乏支持性的监管环境。本文强调需要理解数字健康知识经济的政治经济学以及可能出现的新监管挑战。本文得出结论,政府需要发挥更积极的作用,以促进有益的ICT创新大规模传播,并确保卫生系统发展的总体模式满足包括穷人在内人群的需求。