• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疾病特征影响采用电子健康记录的隐私权衡:德国的一项调查研究

Disease characteristics influence the privacy calculus to adopt electronic health records: A survey study in Germany.

作者信息

von Kalckreuth Niklas, Feufel Markus A

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Ergonomics (IPA), Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2024 Sep 5;10:20552076241274245. doi: 10.1177/20552076241274245. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076241274245
PMID:39247096
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11378173/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The electronic health record (EHR) is integral to improving healthcare efficiency and quality. Its successful implementation hinges on patient willingness to use it, particularly in Germany where concerns about data security and privacy significantly influence usage intention. Little is known about how specific characteristics of medical data influence patients' intention to use the EHR.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to validate the privacy calculus model (PCM) regarding EHRs and to assess how personal and disease characteristics, namely disease-related stigma and disease time course, affect PCM predictions.

METHODS

An online survey was conducted to empirically validate the PCM for EHR, incorporating a case vignette varying in disease-related stigma (high/low) and time course (acute/chronic), with  = 241 participants, aged 18 years and older residing in Germany with no previous experience with the diseases mentioned in the respective medical reports. Participants were randomized (single-blinded) into four groups in parallel: high stigma and acute time course ( = 74), high stigma and chronic time course ( = 56), low stigma and acute time course ( = 62) and low stigma and chronic time course ( = 49). The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling with partial least squares.

RESULTS

The model explains ² = 71.8% of the variance in intention to use. The intention to use is influenced by perceived benefits, data privacy concerns, trust in the provider, and social norms. However, only the disease's time course, not stigma, affects this intention. For acute diseases, perceived benefits and social norms are influential, whereas for chronic diseases, perceived benefits, privacy concerns, and trust in the provider influence intention.

CONCLUSIONS

The PCM validation for EHRs reveals that personal and disease characteristics shape usage intention in Germany. The need for tailored EHR adoption strategies that address specific needs and concerns of patients with different disease types. Such strategies could lead to a more successful and widespread implementation of EHRs, especially in privacy-conscious contexts.

摘要

背景

电子健康记录(EHR)对于提高医疗效率和质量至关重要。其成功实施取决于患者使用它的意愿,尤其是在德国,对数据安全和隐私的担忧显著影响使用意愿。关于医疗数据的特定特征如何影响患者使用电子健康记录的意愿,人们知之甚少。

目的

本研究旨在验证关于电子健康记录的隐私计算模型(PCM),并评估个人和疾病特征,即疾病相关耻辱感和疾病病程,如何影响PCM预测。

方法

进行了一项在线调查,以实证验证电子健康记录的PCM,纳入了一个病例 vignette,其疾病相关耻辱感(高/低)和病程(急性/慢性)各不相同,共有241名年龄在18岁及以上、居住在德国且之前没有各自医学报告中提及疾病经历的参与者。参与者被随机(单盲)平行分为四组:高耻辱感和急性病程(n = 74)、高耻辱感和慢性病程(n = 56)、低耻辱感和急性病程(n = 62)以及低耻辱感和慢性病程(n = 49)。使用偏最小二乘结构方程模型对数据进行分析。

结果

该模型解释了使用意愿方差的R² = 71.8%。使用意愿受到感知利益、数据隐私担忧、对提供者的信任和社会规范的影响。然而,只有疾病病程而非耻辱感会影响这种意愿。对于急性疾病,感知利益和社会规范有影响,而对于慢性疾病,感知利益、隐私担忧和对提供者的信任会影响意愿。

结论

电子健康记录的PCM验证表明,个人和疾病特征塑造了德国的使用意愿。需要制定量身定制的电子健康记录采用策略,以满足不同疾病类型患者的特定需求和担忧。此类策略可能会导致电子健康记录更成功、更广泛地实施,尤其是在注重隐私的环境中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11d3/11378173/701996fc47f9/10.1177_20552076241274245-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11d3/11378173/9bdd9710527c/10.1177_20552076241274245-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11d3/11378173/9a920518d3a9/10.1177_20552076241274245-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11d3/11378173/5b012a368a67/10.1177_20552076241274245-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11d3/11378173/4132f938c9ca/10.1177_20552076241274245-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11d3/11378173/ba299671901e/10.1177_20552076241274245-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11d3/11378173/701996fc47f9/10.1177_20552076241274245-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11d3/11378173/9bdd9710527c/10.1177_20552076241274245-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11d3/11378173/9a920518d3a9/10.1177_20552076241274245-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11d3/11378173/5b012a368a67/10.1177_20552076241274245-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11d3/11378173/4132f938c9ca/10.1177_20552076241274245-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11d3/11378173/ba299671901e/10.1177_20552076241274245-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11d3/11378173/701996fc47f9/10.1177_20552076241274245-fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Disease characteristics influence the privacy calculus to adopt electronic health records: A survey study in Germany.疾病特征影响采用电子健康记录的隐私权衡:德国的一项调查研究
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 5;10:20552076241274245. doi: 10.1177/20552076241274245. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Extending the Privacy Calculus to the mHealth Domain: Survey Study on the Intention to Use mHealth Apps in Germany.将隐私演算扩展到移动健康领域:德国使用移动健康应用意愿的调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Aug 16;10:e45503. doi: 10.2196/45503.
3
Do personal health concerns and trust in healthcare providers mitigate privacy concerns? Effects on patients' intention to share personal health data on electronic health records.个人健康问题和对医疗服务提供者的信任是否会减轻对隐私的担忧?对患者在电子健康记录中分享个人健康数据意愿的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Aug;283:114146. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114146. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
4
Influence of Disease-Related Stigma on Patients' Decisions to Upload Medical Reports to the German Electronic Health Record: Randomized Controlled Trial.疾病污名对患者将医疗报告上传至德国电子健康记录决策的影响:随机对照试验。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Apr 10;11:e52625. doi: 10.2196/52625.
5
Electronic health record adopters: a typology based on patients' privacy concerns and perceived benefits.电子健康记录采用者:基于患者隐私关注和感知收益的分类。
Public Health. 2022 Jun;207:46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
6
Individuals' privacy concerns and adoption of contact tracing mobile applications in a pandemic: A situational privacy calculus perspective.个人隐私顾虑与疫情期间接触者追踪移动应用的采用:情境隐私计算视角。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 1;28(3):463-471. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa240.
7
Public and physician's expectations and ethical concerns about electronic health record: Benefits outweigh risks except for information security.公众和医生对电子健康记录的期望和伦理关注:除了信息安全外,好处大于风险。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Feb;110:98-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
8
The Roles of Trust in Government and Sense of Community in the COVID-19 Contact Tracing Privacy Calculus: Mixed Method Study Using a 2-Wave Survey and In-Depth Interviews.信任政府和社区意识在 COVID-19 接触者追踪隐私计算中的作用:使用两波调查和深入访谈的混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 7;12:e48986. doi: 10.2196/48986.
9
Privacy Concerns About Health Information Disclosure in Mobile Health: Questionnaire Study Investigating the Moderation Effect of Social Support.移动健康中健康信息披露的隐私问题:问卷调查研究社会支持的调节作用。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Feb 8;9(2):e19594. doi: 10.2196/19594.
10
The Use of a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Predict Patients' Usage of a Personal Health Record System: The Role of Security, Privacy, and Usability.使用技术接受模型(TAM)预测患者对个人健康记录系统的使用:安全性、隐私性和可用性的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 11;20(2):1347. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021347.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of consent for electronic health information exchange: an observational retrospective study.电子健康信息交换同意书的决定因素:一项观察性回顾性研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Aug 7;23(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01377-x.
2
Sexual health service users' perspectives on artificial intelligence applications for identification of lesions associated with sexually transmissible infections: A qualitative study.性健康服务使用者对人工智能应用于识别性传播感染相关病变的看法:一项定性研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Jul 24;11:20552076251361749. doi: 10.1177/20552076251361749. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of Disease-Related Stigma on Patients' Decisions to Upload Medical Reports to the German Electronic Health Record: Randomized Controlled Trial.疾病污名对患者将医疗报告上传至德国电子健康记录决策的影响:随机对照试验。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Apr 10;11:e52625. doi: 10.2196/52625.
2
Extending the Privacy Calculus to the mHealth Domain: Survey Study on the Intention to Use mHealth Apps in Germany.将隐私演算扩展到移动健康领域:德国使用移动健康应用意愿的调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Aug 16;10:e45503. doi: 10.2196/45503.
3
Patient Acceptance of Prescribed and Fully Reimbursed mHealth Apps in Germany: An UTAUT2-based Online Survey Study.
User Input in the Development of Digital Sexual Health Tools: A Scoping Review and Guidance for Tool Developers.
数字性健康工具开发中的用户输入:范围综述及给工具开发者的指南
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70360. doi: 10.1111/hex.70360.
4
Trustworthiness of the electronic health record in Germany: an exploratory, user-centered analysis.德国电子健康记录的可信度:一项探索性的、以用户为中心的分析。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Mar 7;7:1473326. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1473326. eCollection 2025.
德国患者对处方和全额报销的移动健康应用程序的接受度:基于 UTAUT2 的在线调查研究。
J Med Syst. 2023 Jan 27;47(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01910-x.
4
Implementing Large-Scale Electronic Health Records: Experiences from implementations of Epic in Denmark and Finland.实施大型电子健康记录系统:丹麦和芬兰实施 Epic 系统的经验。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Nov;167:104868. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104868. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
5
[Patient group-specific data sovereignty needs and acceptance of electronic health records].[患者群体特定的数据主权需求与电子健康记录的接受度]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Nov;65(11):1197-1203. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03589-w. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
6
Factors Associated With Willingness to Share Health Information: Rapid Review.与健康信息分享意愿相关的因素:快速综述
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Feb 9;9(1):e20702. doi: 10.2196/20702.
7
Do personal health concerns and trust in healthcare providers mitigate privacy concerns? Effects on patients' intention to share personal health data on electronic health records.个人健康问题和对医疗服务提供者的信任是否会减轻对隐私的担忧?对患者在电子健康记录中分享个人健康数据意愿的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Aug;283:114146. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114146. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
8
Values, challenges and future directions of big data analytics in healthcare: A systematic review.大数据分析在医疗保健中的价值、挑战和未来方向:系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Nov;241:112533. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112533. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
9
Understanding the patient privacy perspective on health information exchange: A systematic review.理解患者对健康信息交换的隐私观点:系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 May;125:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
10
Individuals' adoption of smart technologies for preventive health care: a structural equation modeling approach.个体采用智能技术进行预防保健:结构方程建模方法。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2020 Jun;23(2):203-214. doi: 10.1007/s10729-019-09468-2. Epub 2019 Jan 26.