Malekinejad Mohsen, Parriott Andrea, Viitanen Amanda P, Horvath Hacsi, Marks Suzanne M, Kahn James G
Phillip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 7;12(8):e0180707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180707. eCollection 2017.
To synthesize outputs and outcomes of community-based tuberculosis targeted testing and treatment (TTT) programs in foreign-born populations (FBP) in the United States (US).
We systematically searched five bibliographic databases and other key resources. Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria to screen citations and extracted data from included studies. We excluded studies that contained <50% FBP participants or that examined steps only after diagnosis of latent TB infection (LTBI). We stratified studies as majority FBP (50-90%) and predominantly FBP (>90%). We used random-effects meta-analytic models to calculate pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for community-based TTT cascade steps (e.g., recruited, tested and treated), and used them to create two hypothetical cascades for 100 individuals.
Fifteen studies conducted in 10 US states met inclusion criteria. Studies were heterogeneous in recruitment strategies and mostly recruited participants born in Latin America. Of 100 hypothetical participants (predominantly FBP) reached by community-based TTT, 40.4 (95% CI 28.6 to 50.1) would have valid test results, 15.7 (95% CI 9.9 to 21.8) would test positive, and 3.6 (95% CI 1.4 to 6.0) would complete LTBI treatment. Likewise, of 100 hypothetical participants (majority FBP) reached, 77.9 (95% CI 54.0 to 92.1) would have valid test results, 26.5 (95% CI 18.0 to 33.5) would test positive, and 5.4 (95% CI 2.1 to 9.0) would complete LTBI treatment. Of those with valid test results, pooled proportions of LTBI test positive for predominantly FBP and majority FBP were 38.9% (95% CI 28.6 to 49.8) and 34.3% (95% CI 29.3 to 39.5), respectively.
We observed high attrition throughout the care cascade in FBP participating in LTBI community-based TTT studies. Few studies included cascade steps prior to LTBI diagnosis, limiting our review findings. Moreover, Asia-born populations in the US are substantially underrepresented in the FBP community-based TTT literature.
综合美国外国出生人口(FBP)中基于社区的结核病靶向检测与治疗(TTT)项目的产出和结果。
我们系统检索了五个文献数据库及其他关键资源。两名评审员独立应用纳入标准筛选文献并从纳入研究中提取数据。我们排除了FBP参与者比例低于50%或仅研究潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)诊断后步骤的研究。我们将研究分为多数FBP(50 - 90%)和主要为FBP(>90%)两类。我们使用随机效应荟萃分析模型计算基于社区的TTT流程步骤(如招募、检测和治疗)的合并比例及95%置信区间(CI),并用于为100个人创建两个假设流程。
在美国10个州进行的15项研究符合纳入标准。研究在招募策略上存在异质性,且大多招募出生于拉丁美洲的参与者。在通过基于社区的TTT接触到的100名假设参与者(主要为FBP)中,40.4(95% CI 28.6至50.1)将获得有效的检测结果,15.7(95% CI 9.9至21.8)将检测呈阳性,3.6(95% CI 1.4至6.0)将完成LTBI治疗。同样,在接触到的100名假设参与者(多数为FBP)中,77.9(95% CI 54.0至92.1)将获得有效的检测结果,26.5(95% CI 18.0至33.5)将检测呈阳性,5.4(95% CI 2.1至9.0)将完成LTBI治疗。在那些获得有效检测结果的人中,主要为FBP和多数为FBP的LTBI检测呈阳性的合并比例分别为38.9%(95% CI 28.6至49.8)和34.3%(95% CI 29.3至39.5)。
我们观察到参与基于社区的LTBI TTT研究的FBP在整个护理流程中流失率很高。很少有研究纳入LTBI诊断之前的流程步骤,这限制了我们的综述结果。此外,在美国基于社区的TTT文献中,在美国出生的亚洲人群的代表性严重不足。