Lopez D'jon, Leach Isabel, Moore Elinor, Norrish Alan R
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Indian J Orthop. 2017 Jul-Aug;51(4):397-404. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_307_16.
In the United Kingdom approximately 80,000 total hip arthroplasties are undertaken on an average each year. The popularity and demand for this operation are continually increasing. Our understanding of arthroplasty surgery and its complications has evolved greatly, and as a result infection rates are undeniably at an all-time low. The increasing volume of operations being performed does, however, mean that we still continue to see an increased number of cases of infection. There is no doubt that periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) poses a complex clinical and diagnostic predicament to clinicians. Delay in the diagnosis and treatment of PJI can not only be detrimental in terms of patient morbidity, but it also poses a significant financial burden to health care institutions. It is therefore in the best interest of the patient, surgeon, and institution to optimize the diagnosis and treatment of this devastating complication. There remains considerable variability in terms of approach to diagnosis and treatment of PJI among orthopedic surgeons. In this review, we will, therefore, examine in detail the current body of evidence available on PJI. We will discuss the most robust and up-to-date methods of diagnosis and offer a comparison of management strategies.
在英国,每年平均进行约8万例全髋关节置换术。这种手术的受欢迎程度和需求持续上升。我们对关节置换手术及其并发症的认识有了很大发展,因此感染率无疑处于历史最低水平。然而,手术量的增加确实意味着我们仍会看到感染病例数量的增加。毫无疑问,假体周围关节感染(PJI)给临床医生带来了复杂的临床和诊断困境。PJI诊断和治疗的延迟不仅对患者的发病率有害,还会给医疗机构带来巨大的经济负担。因此,优化这种毁灭性并发症的诊断和治疗符合患者、外科医生和医疗机构的最大利益。骨科医生在PJI的诊断和治疗方法上仍存在很大差异。因此,在本综述中,我们将详细研究目前关于PJI的现有证据。我们将讨论最可靠和最新的诊断方法,并对管理策略进行比较。