Sun Wai Han, Wong Carlos King Ho, Wong William Chi Wai
Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, The University of Hong Kong, Ap Lei Chau, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 9;19(8):e284. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7403.
The peer-led, social media-delivered intervention is an emerging method in sexual health promotion. However, no research has yet investigated its effectiveness as compared with other online channels or in an Asian population.
The objective of this study is to compare a peer-led, social media-delivered, safer sex intervention with a sexual health website. Both conditions target Chinese college students in Hong Kong.
A randomized controlled trial was conducted with a peer-led, safer sex Facebook group as the intervention and an existing online sexual health website as the control. The intervention materials were developed with peer input and followed the information-motivation-behavioral skills model; the intervention was moderated by peer educators. The participants filled out the online questionnaires before and after the 6-week intervention period. Outcome evaluations included safer sex attitudes, behavioral skills, and behaviors, while process evaluation focused on online experience, online-visiting frequency, and online engagement. The effect of online-visiting frequency and online engagement on outcome variables was investigated.
Of 196 eligible participants-100 in the control group and 96 in the intervention group-who joined the study, 2 (1.0%) control participants joined the Facebook group and 24 of the remaining 194 participants (12.4%) were lost to follow-up. For the process evaluation, participants in the intervention group reported more satisfying online experiences (P<.001) and a higher level of online-visiting frequency (P<.001). They also had more positive comments when compared with the control group. For outcome evaluation, within-group analysis showed significant improvement in condom use attitude (P=.02) and behavioral skills (P<.001) in the intervention group, but not in the control group. No significant between-group difference was found. After adjusting for demographic data, increased online-visiting frequency was associated with better contraceptive use behavioral intention (P=.05), better behavioral skills (P=.02), and more frequent condom use (P=.04).
A peer-led, social media-delivered, safer sex intervention was found to be feasible and effective in improving attitudes toward condom use and behavioral skills, but was not significantly more effective than a website. Future research may focus on the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of this popular method, as well as the potential cultural differences of using social media between different countries.
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR): ChiCTR-IOR-16009495; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=16234 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6s0Fc2L9T).
同伴主导、通过社交媒体提供的干预措施是性健康促进领域一种新兴的方法。然而,尚无研究将其与其他在线渠道进行有效性比较,也没有在亚洲人群中进行过此类研究。
本研究旨在比较同伴主导、通过社交媒体提供的安全性行为干预措施与一个性健康网站。两种干预措施的目标人群均为香港的中国大学生。
进行了一项随机对照试验,以一个同伴主导的安全性行为Facebook群组作为干预措施,以一个现有的在线性健康网站作为对照。干预材料在同伴的参与下开发,遵循信息-动机-行为技能模型;干预由同伴教育者进行引导。参与者在为期6周的干预期前后填写在线问卷。结果评估包括安全性行为态度、行为技能和行为,而过程评估则侧重于在线体验、在线访问频率和在线参与度。研究了在线访问频率和在线参与度对结果变量的影响。
在196名符合条件并参与研究的参与者中,对照组100人,干预组96人,2名(1.0%)对照组参与者加入了Facebook群组,其余194名参与者中有24名(12.4%)失访。对于过程评估,干预组参与者报告的在线体验更令人满意(P<0.001),在线访问频率更高(P<0.001)。与对照组相比,他们也有更多积极的评价。对于结果评估,组内分析显示干预组在避孕套使用态度(P=0.02)和行为技能(P<0.001)方面有显著改善,而对照组没有。组间未发现显著差异。在调整人口统计学数据后,在线访问频率增加与更好的避孕行为意图(P=0.05)、更好的行为技能(P=0.02)和更频繁的避孕套使用(P=0.04)相关。
发现同伴主导、通过社交媒体提供的安全性行为干预措施在改善避孕套使用态度和行为技能方面是可行且有效的,但并不比网站显著更有效。未来的研究可能集中在这种流行方法的长期有效性和成本效益,以及不同国家使用社交媒体的潜在文化差异。
中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR):ChiCTR-IOR-16009495;http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=16234(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/6s0Fc2L9T)。