Department of General Practice, University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 30;22(10):e16378. doi: 10.2196/16378.
Online dating apps are popular platforms for seeking romance and sexual relationships among young adults. As mobile apps can easily gain access to a pool of strangers ("new friends") at any time and place, it leads to heightened sexual health risks and privacy concerns.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a peer-led web-based intervention for online dating apps to prepare Chinese college students so that they have better self-efficacy when using dating apps.
An open clustered randomized controlled trial was conducted among students from three colleges (The University of Hong Kong, Hang Seng University of Hong Kong, and Yijin Programme of Vocational Training College) in Hong Kong. Students aged 17 to 27 years who attended common core curriculum or general education were randomized into intervention and control groups. The intervention material, developed with high peer engagement, included four short videos, an interactive scenario game, and a risk assessment tool. An existing website promoting physical activities and healthy living was used as a control. Using the information, motivation, and behavioral skills (IMB) approach to design the evaluation, questionnaires covering participants' sociodemographics and dating app characteristics, as well as the general self-efficacy scale (GSE) as the primary outcome and the risk propensity scale (RPS) as the secondary outcome were administered before, immediately after, and at 1 month after the intervention. Intention-to-treat analysis was adopted, and between-group differences were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test. A post-hoc multiple linear regression model was used to examine the correlates of the GSE and RPS.
A total of 578 eligible participants (290 in the intervention group and 288 in the control group) participated in the study with 36 lost to follow-up. There were more female participants (318/542, 58.7%) than male participants in the sample, reflecting the distribution of college students. Over half of the participants (286/542, 52.8%) reported the following reasons for using dating apps: being curious (170/498, 34.1%), trying to make new friends (158/498, 31.7%), and finding friends with similar interests (121/498, 24.3%). Overall, the participants in the intervention group reported favorable experiences when compared with the finding in the control group. There was significant improvement in the GSE score and reduction in the RPS score (P<.001) in the intervention group. University of Hong Kong students were more susceptible to risk reduction after the intervention when compared with students from the other two institutions.
The online intervention was effective in improving general self-efficacy and reducing risk tendency among young students. Future work is needed to determine if this approach is cost-effective and such behavioral change is sustainable.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03685643; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03685643.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s13063-018-3167-5.
在线约会应用程序是年轻人寻求浪漫和性关系的热门平台。由于移动应用程序可以随时轻松地接触到一群陌生人(“新朋友”),因此会带来更高的性健康风险和隐私问题。
本研究旨在评估一种同伴主导的基于网络的在线约会应用程序干预措施对中国大学生的有效性,以便他们在使用约会应用程序时具有更好的自我效能感。
在香港的三所大学(香港大学、恒生大学和毅进计划职业培训学院)中进行了一项开放性聚类随机对照试验。年龄在 17 至 27 岁之间、参加共同核心课程或通识教育的学生被随机分为干预组和对照组。干预材料是在高同伴参与度的基础上开发的,包括四个短视频、一个互动情景游戏和一个风险评估工具。使用现有的促进体育活动和健康生活的网站作为对照。采用信息、动机和行为技能(IMB)方法进行设计评估,问卷涵盖参与者的社会人口统计学和约会应用程序特征,以及一般自我效能感量表(GSE)作为主要结果和风险倾向量表(RPS)作为次要结果。在干预前后和 1 个月后进行评估。采用意向治疗分析,并使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验评估组间差异。采用事后多重线性回归模型检验 GSE 和 RPS 的相关性。
共有 578 名符合条件的参与者(干预组 290 名,对照组 288 名)参加了研究,36 名参与者失访。样本中女性参与者(542 名中的 318 名)多于男性参与者(542 名中的 286 名),反映了大学生的分布情况。超过一半的参与者(542 名中的 286 名)表示使用约会应用程序的原因如下:好奇(498 名中的 170 名,34.1%)、尝试结交新朋友(498 名中的 158 名,31.7%)和寻找有相似兴趣的朋友(498 名中的 121 名,24.3%)。总体而言,与对照组相比,干预组的参与者报告了较好的体验。干预组的 GSE 评分显著提高,RPS 评分降低(P<.001)。与其他两所学校的学生相比,香港大学的学生在干预后更易降低风险。
在线干预措施有效地提高了年轻学生的一般自我效能感并降低了风险倾向。需要进一步研究确定这种方法是否具有成本效益,以及这种行为改变是否可持续。