Powell Anna L, Nelson Andrew J D, Hindley Emma, Davies Moira, Aggleton John P, Vann Seralynne D
School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK.
School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK.
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Sep 29;335:88-102. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
Cohorts of rats with excitotoxic retrosplenial cortex lesions were tested on four behavioural tasks sensitive to dysfunctions in prelimbic cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, or both. In this way the study tested whether retrosplenial cortex has nonspatial functions that reflect its anatomical interactions with these frontal cortical areas. In Experiment 1, retrosplenial cortex lesions had no apparent effect on a set-shifting digging task that taxed intradimensional and extradimensional attention, as well as reversal learning. Likewise, retrosplenial cortex lesions did not impair a strategy shift task in an automated chamber, which involved switching from visual-based to response-based discriminations and, again, included a reversal (Experiment 2). Indeed, there was evidence that the retrosplenial lesions aided the initial switch to response-based selection. No lesion deficit was found on an automated cost-benefit task that pitted size of reward against effort to achieve that reward (Experiment 3). Finally, while retrosplenial cortex lesions affected matching-to-place task in a T-maze, the profile of deficits differed from that associated with prelimbic cortex damage (Experiment 4). When the task was switched to a nonmatching design, retrosplenial cortex lesions had no apparent effect on performance. The results from the four experiments show that many frontal tasks do not require the retrosplenial cortex, highlighting the specificity of their functional interactions. The results show how retrosplenial cortex lesions spare those learning tasks in which there is no mismatch between the internal and external representations used to guide behavioural choice. In addition, these experiments further highlight the importance of the retrosplenial cortex in solving tasks with a spatial component.
对患有兴奋性毒性压后皮质损伤的大鼠队列进行了四项行为任务测试,这些任务对前边缘皮质、前扣带回皮质或两者的功能障碍敏感。通过这种方式,该研究测试了压后皮质是否具有反映其与这些额叶皮质区域解剖学相互作用的非空间功能。在实验1中,压后皮质损伤对一项集转换挖掘任务没有明显影响,该任务考验维度内和维度外注意力以及逆向学习。同样,压后皮质损伤也没有损害自动实验箱中的策略转换任务,该任务涉及从基于视觉的辨别转换为基于反应的辨别,并且同样包括一次逆向转换(实验2)。事实上,有证据表明压后皮质损伤有助于最初向基于反应的选择转换。在一项将奖励大小与获得该奖励所需努力相权衡的自动成本效益任务中未发现损伤缺陷(实验3)。最后,虽然压后皮质损伤影响了T迷宫中的位置匹配任务,但缺陷模式与前边缘皮质损伤相关的模式不同(实验4)。当任务转换为非匹配设计时,压后皮质损伤对表现没有明显影响。这四项实验的结果表明,许多额叶任务不需要压后皮质,突出了它们功能相互作用的特异性。结果表明压后皮质损伤如何使那些在用于指导行为选择的内部和外部表征之间不存在不匹配的学习任务得以保留。此外,这些实验进一步突出了压后皮质在解决具有空间成分的任务中的重要性。