Suppr超能文献

非正式照料的社会人口学决定因素:同住照料与非同住照料

Socio-demographic determinants of informal caregiving: co-resident versus extra-resident care.

作者信息

De Koker Benedicte

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, St-Jacobstraat 2, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Ageing. 2008 Dec 9;6(1):3-15. doi: 10.1007/s10433-008-0103-7. eCollection 2009 Mar.

Abstract

This article adds to the literature on the 'supply side' of informal care, by examining the socio-demographic determinants of co-resident and extra-resident informal caregiving. Results from the population survey "Care in Flanders" ( = 2826), provide evidence for a different relationship between socio-demographic characteristics and informal caregiving, according to the location of care. Women, persons living without children and married (vs. unmarried) persons are more likely to be involved in extra-resident care. Involvement in co-resident care on the other hand, is more common among persons in less good health and sharing a household with someone other than a spouse or child, mostly a parent. The relationship between socio-demographic factors and care intensity is not uniform as well: while younger age and having no paid work are related to more intensive caregiving within the household, this is not the case among extra-resident caregivers. Results may be explained by the fact of some groups having more/less access to "legitimate excuses" for providing less extra-resident care, unequal risks of being confronted with (higher) care needs, as well as selection effects. Overall, our results were weak, pointing to the weakness of a strictly supply based approach in order to predict evolutions in informal care. Future studies should be aware of the differences between co-resident and extra-resident caregiving, taking into account factors from a supply as well as a demand perspective.

摘要

本文通过研究同住和非同住非正式照料的社会人口学决定因素,为非正式照料“供给侧”的文献增添了内容。“弗拉芒地区的照料”人口调查(n = 2826)的结果表明,根据照料地点的不同,社会人口学特征与非正式照料之间存在不同的关系。女性、无子女同住者以及已婚(与未婚相比)者更有可能参与非同住照料。另一方面,健康状况较差且与配偶或子女以外的人(大多是父母)同住的人更常参与同住照料。社会人口学因素与照料强度之间的关系也不一致:虽然年龄较小且没有有偿工作与家庭内部更密集的照料有关,但在非同住照料者中并非如此。结果可能是由于一些群体获得较少非同住照料的“合理借口”的机会更多/更少、面临(更高)照料需求的风险不平等以及选择效应。总体而言,我们的结果并不显著,这表明仅基于供给的方法在预测非正式照料的演变方面存在局限性。未来的研究应注意同住照料和非同住照料之间的差异,从供给和需求的角度考虑各种因素。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Intersectionality in informal care research: a scoping review.非正规护理研究中的交叉性:范围综述。
Scand J Public Health. 2023 Feb;51(1):106-124. doi: 10.1177/14034948211027816. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验