• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Socio-demographic determinants of informal caregiving: co-resident versus extra-resident care.非正式照料的社会人口学决定因素:同住照料与非同住照料
Eur J Ageing. 2008 Dec 9;6(1):3-15. doi: 10.1007/s10433-008-0103-7. eCollection 2009 Mar.
2
Gender and socio-economic inequalities in health and living conditions among co-resident informal caregivers: a nationwide survey in Spain.共同居住的非正式照护者的健康和生活条件中的性别和社会经济不平等:西班牙全国性调查。
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Mar;73(3):700-715. doi: 10.1111/jan.13172. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
3
The Association Between Informal Caregiving and Poor Self-rated Health Among Ever-married Women in Japan: A Nationally Representative Survey.日本已婚女性中非正式护理与自我健康评估较差之间的关联:一项全国代表性调查。
J Epidemiol. 2022 Apr 5;32(4):174-179. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20200320. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
4
Are informal caregivers less happy than noncaregivers? Happiness and the intensity of caregiving in combination with paid and voluntary work.非正式照料者是否比非照料者更不幸福?幸福与照料强度以及有偿工作和志愿工作的关系。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Mar;27(1):44-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.00998.x. Epub 2012 May 10.
5
Trends and determinants of informal and formal caregiving in the community for disabled elderly people in Taiwan.台湾地区社区中残疾老年人非正式和正式护理的趋势和决定因素。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013 Mar-Apr;56(2):370-6. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2012.11.005. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
6
Paid and unpaid support received by co-resident informal caregivers attending to community-dwelling older adults in Spain.在西班牙,照顾社区居住老年人的同住非正式照料者所获得的有偿和无偿支持。
Eur J Ageing. 2011 Apr 6;8(2):95. doi: 10.1007/s10433-011-0184-6. eCollection 2011 Jun.
7
Health effects of informal caregiving across Europe: A longitudinal approach.欧洲非正式照料的健康影响:一种纵向研究方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Jan;173:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.036. Epub 2016 Nov 27.
8
Illustration of informal caregiving within Saudi society: demography, scope of care and enabling arrangements.沙特社会中非正式照料的说明:人口统计学、照料范围及促成安排。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2017 Jun;31(2):263-272. doi: 10.1111/scs.12339. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
9
The prevalence of informal caregiving to persons with AIDS in the United States: caregiver characteristics and their implications.美国艾滋病患者非正式照料的流行情况:照料者特征及其影响
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Jun;38(11):1543-52. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90116-3.
10
Informal care in Europe: findings from the European Social Survey (2014) special module on the social determinants of health.欧洲的非正式照料:来自欧洲社会调查(2014年)健康社会决定因素特别模块的调查结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Feb 1;27(suppl_1):90-95. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw229.

引用本文的文献

1
How are location and type of caring associated with the carer's mental health? Cross-sectional and longitudinal findings from SHARE.照护的地点和类型如何与照护者的心理健康相关联?来自“健康、退休和老龄化纵向研究”(SHARE)的横断面和纵向研究结果
Eur J Ageing. 2025 Feb 21;22(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s10433-025-00843-3.
2
Non-kin caregivers of terminally ill people: Contributions, experiences, and needs: A protocol for a mixed-methods study.终末期疾病患者的非亲属照护者:贡献、经历和需求:一项混合方法研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 27;19(6):e0306282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306282. eCollection 2024.
3
Insights Into Informal Caregivers' Well-being: A Longitudinal Analysis of Care Intensity, Care Location, and Care Relationship.深入了解非正式照护者的福祉:照护强度、照护地点和照护关系的纵向分析。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Feb 1;79(2). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad166.
4
Quality of Life and Health Determinants of Informal Caregivers Aged 65 Years and Over.65岁及以上非正式照料者的生活质量与健康决定因素
Epidemiologia (Basel). 2023 Nov 6;4(4):464-482. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia4040039.
5
Socioeconomic status and the likelihood of informal care provision in Japan: An analysis considering survival probability of care recipients.社会经济地位与日本非正式护理提供的可能性:考虑到护理接受者的生存概率的分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 13;16(8):e0256107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256107. eCollection 2021.
6
Intersectionality in informal care research: a scoping review.非正规护理研究中的交叉性:范围综述。
Scand J Public Health. 2023 Feb;51(1):106-124. doi: 10.1177/14034948211027816. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
7
The effect of socioeconomic status on informal caregiving for parents among adult married females: evidence from China.社会经济地位对成年已婚女性照顾父母的非正式照料的影响:来自中国的证据。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02094-0.
8
Determinants of informal care-giving in various social relationships in the Netherlands.荷兰不同社会关系中非正式护理的决定因素。
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Nov;29(6):1779-1788. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13286. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
9
Health impact of providing informal care in Portugal.葡萄牙提供非正式护理的健康影响。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Nov 1;20(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01841-z.
10
Evaluation of bottom-up interventions targeting community-dwelling frail older people in Belgium: methodological challenges and lessons for future comparative effectiveness studies.评估针对比利时社区居住的体弱老年人的自下而上干预措施:对未来比较有效性研究的方法学挑战和经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 24;19(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4240-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Caring-related inequalities in psychological distress in Britain during the 1990s.20世纪90年代英国护理相关的心理困扰不平等现象。
J Public Health Med. 2003 Dec;25(4):336-43. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdg082.
2
Proximity of adult children to their parents in Great Britain.英国成年子女与父母的居住距离。
Int J Popul Geogr. 2000 May-Jun;6(3):181-95. doi: 10.1002/1099-1220(200005/06)6:3<181::AID-IJPG181>3.0.CO;2-U.
3
Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study.照料作为死亡的一个风险因素:照料者健康影响研究。
JAMA. 1999 Dec 15;282(23):2215-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.23.2215.

非正式照料的社会人口学决定因素:同住照料与非同住照料

Socio-demographic determinants of informal caregiving: co-resident versus extra-resident care.

作者信息

De Koker Benedicte

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, St-Jacobstraat 2, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Ageing. 2008 Dec 9;6(1):3-15. doi: 10.1007/s10433-008-0103-7. eCollection 2009 Mar.

DOI:10.1007/s10433-008-0103-7
PMID:28798587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5547284/
Abstract

This article adds to the literature on the 'supply side' of informal care, by examining the socio-demographic determinants of co-resident and extra-resident informal caregiving. Results from the population survey "Care in Flanders" ( = 2826), provide evidence for a different relationship between socio-demographic characteristics and informal caregiving, according to the location of care. Women, persons living without children and married (vs. unmarried) persons are more likely to be involved in extra-resident care. Involvement in co-resident care on the other hand, is more common among persons in less good health and sharing a household with someone other than a spouse or child, mostly a parent. The relationship between socio-demographic factors and care intensity is not uniform as well: while younger age and having no paid work are related to more intensive caregiving within the household, this is not the case among extra-resident caregivers. Results may be explained by the fact of some groups having more/less access to "legitimate excuses" for providing less extra-resident care, unequal risks of being confronted with (higher) care needs, as well as selection effects. Overall, our results were weak, pointing to the weakness of a strictly supply based approach in order to predict evolutions in informal care. Future studies should be aware of the differences between co-resident and extra-resident caregiving, taking into account factors from a supply as well as a demand perspective.

摘要

本文通过研究同住和非同住非正式照料的社会人口学决定因素,为非正式照料“供给侧”的文献增添了内容。“弗拉芒地区的照料”人口调查(n = 2826)的结果表明,根据照料地点的不同,社会人口学特征与非正式照料之间存在不同的关系。女性、无子女同住者以及已婚(与未婚相比)者更有可能参与非同住照料。另一方面,健康状况较差且与配偶或子女以外的人(大多是父母)同住的人更常参与同住照料。社会人口学因素与照料强度之间的关系也不一致:虽然年龄较小且没有有偿工作与家庭内部更密集的照料有关,但在非同住照料者中并非如此。结果可能是由于一些群体获得较少非同住照料的“合理借口”的机会更多/更少、面临(更高)照料需求的风险不平等以及选择效应。总体而言,我们的结果并不显著,这表明仅基于供给的方法在预测非正式照料的演变方面存在局限性。未来的研究应注意同住照料和非同住照料之间的差异,从供给和需求的角度考虑各种因素。