• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Determinants of informal care-giving in various social relationships in the Netherlands.荷兰不同社会关系中非正式护理的决定因素。
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Nov;29(6):1779-1788. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13286. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
2
The care receivers perspective: How care-dependent people struggle with accepting help from family members, friends and neighbours.照顾者的视角:依赖照顾的人如何努力接受来自家人、朋友和邻居的帮助。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 May;28(3):762-770. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12906. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
3
From neighbour to carer: An exploratory study on the role of non-kin-carers in end-of-life care at home for older people living alone.从邻居到照料者:关于非亲属照料者在独居老年人居家临终关怀中作用的探索性研究。
Palliat Med. 2017 Jun;31(6):559-565. doi: 10.1177/0269216316666785. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
4
[Caring friends and neighbors as informal caregivers of older adults: A comparison with offspring].[作为老年人非正式照料者的贴心朋友和邻居:与子女的比较]
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2011 Dec;42(6):243-55. doi: 10.1007/s12439-011-0043-0.
5
Emotional disorders among informal caregivers in the general population: target groups for prevention.普通人群中非正式照料者的情绪障碍:预防目标群体。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Feb 15;15:23. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0406-0.
6
[Symposium The future of informal care].[专题研讨会:非正式护理的未来]
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 Apr;48(2):77-88. doi: 10.1007/s12439-017-0208-6.
7
[Living arrangements and social networks of elders. A selection of findings from a NESTOR-Study].[老年人的居住安排与社交网络。NESTOR研究的部分研究结果]
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1998 Jun;29(3):110-9.
8
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
9
Informal care and gifts to and from older people in Europe: The interlinks between giving and receiving.欧洲老年人的非正式照料以及彼此间的礼物馈赠:给予与接受之间的相互联系
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 21;16(1):603. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1830-7.
10
Combining informal care and paid work: The use of work arrangements by working adult-child caregivers in the Netherlands.兼顾非正式照料与有偿工作:荷兰成年子女在职照料者对工作安排的运用
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Jan;26(1):e122-e131. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12485. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiovascular disease risk among Australian unpaid carers - A survival analysis using 15 waves of the HILDA survey.澳大利亚非带薪照料者的心血管疾病风险——基于15轮家庭、收入与劳动力动态调查的生存分析
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 9;20(6):e0323245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323245. eCollection 2025.
2
How are location and type of caring associated with the carer's mental health? Cross-sectional and longitudinal findings from SHARE.照护的地点和类型如何与照护者的心理健康相关联?来自“健康、退休和老龄化纵向研究”(SHARE)的横断面和纵向研究结果
Eur J Ageing. 2025 Feb 21;22(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s10433-025-00843-3.
3
Who came to the rescue? Sources of informal support to older Europeans before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.谁来施以援手?新冠疫情之前、期间及之后欧洲老年人的非正式支持来源。
Age Ageing. 2025 Feb 2;54(2). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf034.
4
Families' importance in nursing care-families' opinions: a cross-sectional survey study in the homecare setting.家庭在护理中的重要性——家庭的观点:一项在家庭护理环境中的横断面调查研究。
Arch Public Health. 2024 Jun 17;82(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01314-4.
5
Childhood Adversities and Caregiving for Older Parents: Building Capacity for a Caring Society.童年逆境与照顾老年父母:建设关爱社会的能力。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Jul 1;79(7). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae083.
6
How do urban green spaces influence heat-related mortality in elderly? A realist synthesis.城市绿地如何影响老年人的热相关死亡率?一个现实主义的综合。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 13;24(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17973-5.
7
The Economic Costs of Informal Care: Estimates from a National Cross-Sectional Survey in The Netherlands.非正式护理的经济成本:来自荷兰全国横断面调查的估计。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Nov;25(8):1311-1331. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01666-8. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
8
Quality of Life and Health Determinants of Informal Caregivers Aged 65 Years and Over.65岁及以上非正式照料者的生活质量与健康决定因素
Epidemiologia (Basel). 2023 Nov 6;4(4):464-482. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia4040039.
9
Support for Older Parents in Need in Europe: The Role of the Social Network and of Individual and Relational Characteristics.欧洲对有需要的老年父母的支持:社会网络以及个人与关系特征的作用。
Innov Aging. 2023 Apr 17;7(4):igad032. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igad032. eCollection 2023.
10
Applying dyadic digital psychological interventions for reducing caregiver burden in the illness context: a systematic review and a meta-analysis protocol.应用对偶数字心理干预减轻疾病背景下照顾者负担的系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 10;13(5):e070279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070279.

本文引用的文献

1
Beyond the definition of formal care: Informal care arrangements among older swedes who are not family.超越正式护理的定义:非家庭成员的瑞典老年人的非正式护理安排。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Mar;28(2):633-641. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12897. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
2
Longitudinal study of factors associated with informal care provision: Evidence from older Australians.与非正式护理提供相关因素的纵向研究:来自澳大利亚老年人的证据。
Australas J Ageing. 2019 Jun;38(2):98-106. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12613. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
3
Gender Differences in Spousal Caregivers' Care and Housework: Fact or Fiction?配偶照料者的照料和家务劳动中的性别差异:事实还是虚构?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Jan 1;75(1):173-183. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby087.
4
For better or worse: Factors predicting outcomes of family care of older people over a one-year period. A six-country European study.无论是好是坏:预测老年人家庭护理一年结果的因素。一项六国欧洲研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 3;13(4):e0195294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195294. eCollection 2018.
5
Informal caregivers' views on the division of responsibilities between themselves and professionals: A scoping review.非正式照料者对自身与专业人员之间责任划分的看法:一项范围综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Jul;26(4):e460-e473. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12529. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
6
Socio-demographic determinants of informal caregiving: co-resident versus extra-resident care.非正式照料的社会人口学决定因素:同住照料与非同住照料
Eur J Ageing. 2008 Dec 9;6(1):3-15. doi: 10.1007/s10433-008-0103-7. eCollection 2009 Mar.
7
Informal care in Europe: findings from the European Social Survey (2014) special module on the social determinants of health.欧洲的非正式照料:来自欧洲社会调查(2014年)健康社会决定因素特别模块的调查结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Feb 1;27(suppl_1):90-95. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw229.
8
Providing informal care in a changing society.在不断变化的社会中提供非正式护理。
Eur J Ageing. 2016;13(3):271-279. doi: 10.1007/s10433-016-0370-7. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
9
Cohort Differences in Received Social Support in Later Life: The Role of Network Type.队列差异在晚年收到的社会支持:网络类型的作用。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017 Jul 1;72(4):706-715. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbw075.
10
Gender Differences in Spousal Care Across the Later Life Course.晚年生活中配偶照料的性别差异。
Res Aging. 2017 Sep;39(8):934-959. doi: 10.1177/0164027516644503. Epub 2016 Apr 24.

荷兰不同社会关系中非正式护理的决定因素。

Determinants of informal care-giving in various social relationships in the Netherlands.

机构信息

The Netherlands Institute for Social Research, The Hague, The Netherlands.

Faculty of Social Sciences, VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Nov;29(6):1779-1788. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13286. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1111/hsc.13286
PMID:33477204
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8596597/
Abstract

This study investigates determinants for offering help to family members, neighbours and friends, based on the Informal Care Model. We do so in pooled representative data for the Netherlands collected in 2014 and 2016 (persons >17 years, n = 13,165). One-third provides informal care to a person with health problems or impairments: partners (4%, n = 671), parents or children (16%, n = 2,381), distant relatives (6%, n = 858), friends or neighbours (6%, n = 839). Marginal effects show differences in the associations of care-giving relationships with sociodemographic factors, barriers and beliefs. Helping a partner is related to age, gender (older people and men are more likely to help) and household composition (singles help less often). Care for close family is given often by 45-64 year olds, women, multiperson households and those with strong family beliefs. Helping second-degree relatives correlates with age (young people help more often), barriers (those living with children help less often) and beliefs (people with professional background in care and people who attend church or mosque helping more often). Providing non-kin care is associated with age and education level (young people less likely to help, people with a high education more likely), barriers (having a fulltime job) and beliefs (work experience in care, church or mosque attendance and norms). The supply of care to partners and close family is mainly associated with sociodemographic factors and barriers while the provision of care to distant family and non-kin is also correlated with beliefs. If desirable policy is to create more informal care, investment in the combination of work and informal care, childcare and supportive arrangements for older community living couples is recommended. It also might be worthwhile to enhance beliefs about the usefulness of helping each other in times of need.

摘要

本研究基于非正式护理模型,探讨了向家庭成员、邻居和朋友提供帮助的决定因素。我们使用了 2014 年和 2016 年在荷兰收集的具有代表性的 pooled 数据(年龄>17 岁的人群,n=13165)进行研究。有三分之一的人会向有健康问题或身体残疾的人提供非正式护理:伴侣(4%,n=671)、父母或子女(16%,n=2381)、远亲(6%,n=858)、朋友或邻居(6%,n=839)。边际效应显示,照顾关系与社会人口因素、障碍和信念之间的关联存在差异。帮助伴侣与年龄、性别(老年人和男性更有可能提供帮助)和家庭构成(单身者帮助较少)有关。照顾近亲通常由 45-64 岁的人、女性、多人家庭和有强烈家庭观念的人提供。帮助二等亲属与年龄有关(年轻人更常提供帮助)、障碍(与子女同住的人帮助较少)和信念(有护理专业背景和参加教堂或清真寺的人更常提供帮助)。提供非亲属护理与年龄和教育水平有关(年轻人不太可能提供帮助,教育程度较高的人更有可能提供帮助)、障碍(全职工作)和信念(护理、教堂或清真寺出勤和规范方面的工作经验)。向伴侣和近亲提供护理的供应主要与社会人口因素和障碍有关,而向远亲提供护理的供应也与信念有关。如果需要制定更理想的政策来增加非正式护理,那么建议投资于工作和非正式护理、儿童保育以及为老年社区生活夫妇提供支持性安排的结合。增强关于在需要时互相帮助的有用性的信念也可能是值得的。