Gustafsson Susanne, Edberg Anna-Karin, Johansson Boo, Dahlin-Ivanoff Synneve
Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology/Occupational Therapy, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
The Vårdal Institute, The Swedish Institute for Health Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Eur J Ageing. 2009 Oct 17;6(4):315. doi: 10.1007/s10433-009-0132-x. eCollection 2009 Dec.
The objective was to investigate definitions of frailty used in studies of multi-component health promotion and disease-preventive (HPDP) intervention programmes for community-dwelling frail elderly persons and to review the content, organisation and effects of HPDP interventions. A systematic review of 19 articles was made, and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) was used as a structural framework for the analysis. The result shows that a consensus was reached on including various aspects of impairments in body functions and structures as an integral part of the frailty concept, with the exception of one subgroup: mental/cognitive functions. Additionally, opinions varied quite consistently regarding aspects of activity limitations and participation restrictions, personal and environmental factors. Ten of the 14 HPDP programmes covered various intervention elements referring to all four ICF components. Eleven programmes involved registered personnel only, while a more divergent pattern was seen in the remaining organisational aspects of the interventions: length of interventions and location plus age segments, participatory approach and contextual information, as well as the theoretical foundation of the interventions. Measures of body functions and structures were significantly improved in 5 out of 17 (29%) targeted aspects. For activity and participation, 12 out of 32 (38%) targeted aspects were positively changed, while the score for environmental factors was 7 out of 22 (32%), and for personal factors 8 out of 22 (36%). Our review suggests that further research is needed to explore and disentangle the complex interrelationships between various interventions and outcomes.
目的是调查在针对社区居家体弱老年人的多成分健康促进与疾病预防(HPDP)干预项目研究中所使用的体弱定义,并回顾HPDP干预的内容、组织和效果。对19篇文章进行了系统综述,并将《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)用作分析的结构框架。结果表明,除了一个亚组:心理/认知功能外,就将身体功能和结构损伤的各个方面纳入体弱概念的一个组成部分达成了共识。此外,关于活动受限和参与限制、个人和环境因素等方面,意见相当一致地存在差异。14个HPDP项目中有10个涵盖了涉及ICF所有四个组成部分的各种干预要素。11个项目仅涉及注册人员,而在干预的其余组织方面则呈现出更多样化的模式:干预时长、地点以及年龄组、参与式方法和背景信息,以及干预的理论基础。在17个(29%)目标方面中,有5个方面的身体功能和结构测量指标得到了显著改善。对于活动和参与,32个(38%)目标方面中有12个方面有积极变化,而环境因素的得分是22个中的7个(32%),个人因素的得分是22个中的8个(36%)。我们的综述表明,需要进一步研究以探索和理清各种干预措施与结果之间复杂的相互关系。