Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Aging and Health Research Center, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Jun;11(3):650-662. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12534. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
BACKGROUND: Frailty is the pre-eminent exigency of aging. Although frailty-related impairments are preventable, and multidomain interventions appear more effective than unimodal ones, the optimal components remain uncertain. METHODS: We devised multidomain interventions against physical and cognitive decline among prefrail/frail community-dwelling ≥65-year-olds and evaluated these in complementary cluster-randomized trials of efficacy and participant empowerment. The Efficacy Study compared ~3-monthly telephone consultations vs. 16, 2 h sessions/year comprising communally partaken physical and cognitive training plus nutrition and disease education; the Empowerment Study compared the standard Efficacy Study multidomain intervention (Sessions 1-10) vs. an enhanced version redesigned to empower and motivate individual participants. Changes from baseline in physical, functional, and cognitive performance were measured after 6 and 12 months in the Efficacy Study and after 6 months in the Empowerment Study, with post-intervention follow-up at 9 months. Primary outcomes are as follows: Cardiovascular Health Study frailty score; gait speed; handgrip strength; and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Secondary outcomes are as follows: instrumental activities of daily living; metabolic equivalent of task (MET); depressed mood (Geriatric Depression Scale-5 ≥2); and malnutrition (Mini-Nutritional Assessment short-form ≤11). Intervention effects were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model. RESULTS: Efficacy Study participants (n = 1082, 40 clusters) were 75.1 ± 6.3 years old, 68.7% women, and 64.7% prefrail/frail; analytic clusters: 19 intervention (410/549 completed) vs. 21 control (375/533 completed). Empowerment Study participants (n = 440, 14 clusters) were 75.9 ± 7.1 years old, 83.6% women, and 56.7% prefrail/frail; analytic clusters: seven intervention (209/230 completed) vs. seven control (189/210 completed). The standard and enhanced multidomain interventions both reduced frailty and significantly improved aspects of physical, functional, and cognitive performance, especially among ≥75-year-olds. Standard multidomain intervention decreased depression [odds ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32, 0.99] and malnutrition (odds ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.26, 0.78) by 12 months and improved concentration at Months 6 (0.23, 95% CI 0.04, 0.42) and 12 (0.46, 95% CI 0.22, 0.70). Participant empowerment augmented activity (4.67 MET/h, 95% CI 1.64, 7.69) and gait speed (0.06 m/s, 95% CI 0.00, 0.11) at 6 months, with sustained improvements in delayed recall (0.63, 95% CI 0.20, 1.06) and MoCA performance (1.29, 95% CI 0.54, 2.03), and less prevalent malnutrition (odds ratio 0.39, 95% CI 0.18, 0.84), 3 months after the intervention ceased. CONCLUSIONS: Pragmatic multidomain intervention can diminish physical frailty, malnutrition, and depression and enhance cognitive performance among community-dwelling elders, especially ≥75-year-olds; this might supplement healthy aging policies, probably more effectively if participants are empowered.
背景:衰弱是衰老的首要要求。尽管与衰弱相关的损伤是可以预防的,并且多领域干预似乎比单模式干预更有效,但最佳组成部分仍不确定。
方法:我们设计了针对身体和认知能力下降的多领域干预措施,适用于有衰弱前期/衰弱前期的社区居住的≥65 岁老年人,并在疗效和参与者赋权的互补性集群随机试验中评估了这些干预措施。功效研究比较了大约每 3 个月一次的电话咨询与每年 16 次、每次 2 小时的会议,包括共同参与的身体和认知训练以及营养和疾病教育;赋权研究比较了标准功效研究多领域干预(会议 1-10)与重新设计的增强版本,旨在赋予和激励个体参与者。在功效研究中,在 6 个月和 12 个月后测量身体、功能和认知表现的变化,在赋权研究中,在 6 个月后测量变化,并在 9 个月后进行干预后随访。主要结果如下:心血管健康研究衰弱评分;步态速度;手握力;以及蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)。次要结果如下:工具性日常生活活动;代谢当量(MET);抑郁情绪(老年抑郁量表-5≥2);以及营养不良(迷你营养评估简短形式≤11)。使用广义线性混合模型分析干预效果。
结果:功效研究参与者(n=1082,40 个簇)年龄为 75.1±6.3 岁,68.7%为女性,64.7%为衰弱前期/衰弱;分析簇:19 个干预(410/549 完成)与 21 个对照(375/533 完成)。赋权研究参与者(n=440,14 个簇)年龄为 75.9±7.1 岁,83.6%为女性,56.7%为衰弱前期/衰弱;分析簇:7 个干预(209/230 完成)与 7 个对照(189/210 完成)。标准和增强型多领域干预都可以减少衰弱,显著改善身体、功能和认知表现的各个方面,尤其是在≥75 岁的人群中。标准多领域干预减少了抑郁[比值比 0.56,95%置信区间(CI)0.32,0.99]和营养不良(比值比 0.45,95%CI 0.26,0.78),并在 12 个月时改善了注意力[0.23,95%CI 0.04,0.42]和 12 个月时的注意力[0.46,95%CI 0.22,0.70]。参与者赋权增强了活动[4.67MET/h,95%CI 1.64,7.69]和步态速度[0.06m/s,95%CI 0.00,0.11],6 个月时持续改善延迟回忆[0.63,95%CI 0.20,1.06]和 MoCA 表现[1.29,95%CI 0.54,2.03],并减少了营养不良的流行率[比值比 0.39,95%CI 0.18,0.84],干预停止后 3 个月。
结论:实用的多领域干预可以减少身体衰弱、营养不良和抑郁,并增强社区居住老年人的认知表现,尤其是≥75 岁的老年人;这可能会补充健康老龄化政策,如果参与者被赋予权力,可能会更有效地补充。
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020-6
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023-6
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2025
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2025-8
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2025-6
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019-10
Alzheimers Dement. 2019-9-23
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018-1
J Epidemiol. 2017-8