Rué Montserrat, Andrinopoulou Eleni-Rosalina, Alvares Danilo, Armero Carmen, Forte Anabel, Blanch Lluis
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Universitat de Lleida-IRBLLEIDA, Lleida, 25198, Spain.
Health Services Research Network in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Spain.
Biom J. 2017 Nov;59(6):1184-1203. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201600221. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
Mechanical ventilation is a common procedure of life support in intensive care. Patient-ventilator asynchronies (PVAs) occur when the timing of the ventilator cycle is not simultaneous with the timing of the patient respiratory cycle. The association between severity markers and the events death or alive discharge has been acknowledged before, however, little is known about the addition of PVAs data to the analyses. We used an index of asynchronies (AI) to measure PVAs and the SOFA (sequential organ failure assessment) score to assess overall severity. To investigate the added value of including the AI, we propose a Bayesian joint model of bivariate longitudinal and competing risks data. The longitudinal process includes a mixed effects model for the SOFA score and a mixed effects beta regression model for the AI. The survival process is defined in terms of a cause-specific hazards model for the competing risks death or alive discharge. Our model indicates that the SOFA score is strongly related to vital status. PVAs are positively associated with alive discharge but there is not enough evidence that PVAs provide a more accurate indication of death prognosis than the SOFA score alone.
机械通气是重症监护中常见的生命支持手段。当呼吸机周期的时间与患者呼吸周期不同步时,就会出现患者 - 呼吸机不同步(PVA)。严重程度指标与死亡或存活出院事件之间的关联此前已得到认可,然而,关于将PVA数据纳入分析的情况却知之甚少。我们使用不同步指数(AI)来衡量PVA,并使用序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分来评估总体严重程度。为了研究纳入AI的附加价值,我们提出了一个双变量纵向和竞争风险数据的贝叶斯联合模型。纵向过程包括一个用于SOFA评分的混合效应模型和一个用于AI的混合效应贝塔回归模型。生存过程是根据竞争风险死亡或存活出院的特定病因风险模型来定义的。我们的模型表明,SOFA评分与生命状态密切相关。PVA与存活出院呈正相关,但没有足够证据表明PVA比单独的SOFA评分能更准确地指示死亡预后。