Trudinger B J, Cook C M, Giles W B, Connelly A, Thompson R S
Lancet. 1987 Jan 24;1(8526):188-90. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)90003-1.
300 patients at high fetal risk (mean gestational age 34 wk) were randomised to a group for antenatal doppler umbilical artery waveform studies and a control group. The timing of delivery was similar in the control and doppler-report-available groups overall. However, in the report group obstetricians allowed the pregnancies of those not selected for elective delivery to continue longer. There was no difference in the rates for elective delivery (induction of labour or caesarean section) in the two groups, whereas among those who went into labour (induced or spontaneous) emergency caesarean section was more frequent in the control group (23%) than in the report group (13%). Fetal distress in labour was also more common in the control group. Babies from the control group spent longer in neonatal intensive care (level 3) and needed more respiratory support than did those in the report group. The findings indicate that the availability of doppler studies leads to better obstetrical decision making.
300名胎儿风险较高(平均孕龄34周)的孕妇被随机分为两组,一组进行产前多普勒脐动脉波形研究,另一组作为对照组。总体而言,对照组和可获得多普勒报告组的分娩时间相似。然而,在报告组中,产科医生允许未被选作择期分娩的孕妇继续妊娠更长时间。两组的择期分娩(引产或剖宫产)率没有差异,而在那些自然发动或引产分娩的孕妇中,对照组的急诊剖宫产率(23%)高于报告组(13%)。产时胎儿窘迫在对照组中也更常见。与报告组相比,对照组的婴儿在新生儿重症监护病房(3级)的住院时间更长,需要更多的呼吸支持。研究结果表明,多普勒研究结果有助于做出更好的产科决策。