• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SIR传染病模型中的时间最优控制策略。

Time-optimal control strategies in SIR epidemic models.

作者信息

Bolzoni Luca, Bonacini Elena, Soresina Cinzia, Groppi Maria

机构信息

Risk Analysis Unit, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna, Via dei Mercati 13, Parma 43126, Italy.

Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 53/A, Parma 43124, Italy.

出版信息

Math Biosci. 2017 Oct;292:86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.mbs.2017.07.011
PMID:28801246
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7094293/
Abstract

We investigate the time-optimal control problem in SIR (Susceptible-Infected-Recovered) epidemic models, focusing on different control policies: vaccination, isolation, culling, and reduction of transmission. Applying the Pontryagin's Minimum Principle (PMP) to the unconstrained control problems (i.e. without costs of control or resource limitations), we prove that, for all the policies investigated, only bang-bang controls with at most one switch are admitted. When a switch occurs, the optimal strategy is to delay the control action some amount of time and then apply the control at the maximum rate for the remainder of the outbreak. This result is in contrast with previous findings on the unconstrained problems of minimizing the total infectious burden over an outbreak, where the optimal strategy is to use the maximal control for the entire epidemic. Then, the critical consequence of our results is that, in a wide range of epidemiological circumstances, it may be impossible to minimize the total infectious burden while minimizing the epidemic duration, and vice versa. Moreover, numerical simulations highlighted additional unexpected results, showing that the optimal control can be delayed also when the control reproduction number is lower than one and that the switching time from no control to maximum control can even occur after the peak of infection has been reached. Our results are especially important for livestock diseases where the minimization of outbreaks duration is a priority due to sanitary restrictions imposed to farms during ongoing epidemics, such as animal movements and export bans.

摘要

我们研究了SIR(易感-感染-康复)传染病模型中的时间最优控制问题,重点关注不同的控制策略:疫苗接种、隔离、扑杀以及降低传播率。将庞特里亚金最小值原理(PMP)应用于无约束控制问题(即无控制成本或资源限制),我们证明,对于所研究的所有策略,只允许最多有一次切换的bang-bang控制。当发生切换时,最优策略是延迟一定时间后再采取控制行动,然后在疫情剩余阶段以最大速率应用控制。这一结果与之前关于在疫情期间最小化总感染负担的无约束问题的研究结果形成对比,在那些研究中最优策略是在整个疫情期间都使用最大控制。那么,我们结果的关键影响在于,在广泛的流行病学情况下,可能无法在最小化疫情持续时间的同时最小化总感染负担,反之亦然。此外,数值模拟突出了其他意外结果,表明当控制再生数低于1时最优控制也可能被延迟,甚至在感染峰值出现后才会从无控制切换到最大控制。我们的结果对于牲畜疾病尤为重要,因为在持续疫情期间,由于对农场实施的卫生限制措施(如动物流动和出口禁令),将疫情持续时间最小化是首要任务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d882/7094293/43b3e1b62b72/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d882/7094293/7993aac50866/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d882/7094293/8cabb4f2508e/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d882/7094293/f5ea2343fd15/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d882/7094293/f7cc6e3266f6/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d882/7094293/b1ed885856d3/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d882/7094293/43b3e1b62b72/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d882/7094293/7993aac50866/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d882/7094293/8cabb4f2508e/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d882/7094293/f5ea2343fd15/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d882/7094293/f7cc6e3266f6/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d882/7094293/b1ed885856d3/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d882/7094293/43b3e1b62b72/gr6_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Time-optimal control strategies in SIR epidemic models.SIR传染病模型中的时间最优控制策略。
Math Biosci. 2017 Oct;292:86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
2
Optimal control of epidemic size and duration with limited resources.利用有限资源优化控制疫情规模和持续时间。
Math Biosci. 2019 Sep;315:108232. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2019.108232. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
3
On the optimal control of SIR model with Erlang-distributed infectious period: isolation strategies.具有爱尔朗分布传染期的 SIR 模型的最优控制:隔离策略。
J Math Biol. 2021 Sep 22;83(4):36. doi: 10.1007/s00285-021-01668-1.
4
Mathematical model of the 2010 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Japan and evaluation of control measures.日本 2010 年口蹄疫疫情的数学模型及防控措施评价。
Prev Vet Med. 2013 Nov 1;112(3-4):183-93. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
5
Optimal isolation strategies of emerging infectious diseases with limited resources.有限资源下新发传染病的最佳隔离策略。
Math Biosci Eng. 2013 Oct-Dec;10(5-6):1691-701. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.1691.
6
Optimal control of epidemics with limited resources.资源有限情况下传染病的最优控制
J Math Biol. 2011 Mar;62(3):423-51. doi: 10.1007/s00285-010-0341-0. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
7
Optimal control for SIRC epidemic outbreak.SIRC 传染病爆发的最优控制。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2013 Jun;110(3):333-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
8
Mitigation of epidemics in contact networks through optimal contact adaptation.通过最优接触适应缓解接触网络中的流行病。
Math Biosci Eng. 2013 Aug;10(4):1227-51. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.1227.
9
A decision-tree to optimise control measures during the early stage of a foot-and-mouth disease epidemic.一种用于优化口蹄疫疫情早期控制措施的决策树。
Prev Vet Med. 2002 Aug 30;54(4):301-24. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5877(02)00053-3.
10
On the Regional Control of a Reaction-Diffusion System SIR.关于反应扩散系统 SIR 的区域控制。
Bull Math Biol. 2019 Dec 23;82(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s11538-019-00673-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety-Critical Control of Compartmental Epidemiological Models With Measurement Delays.具有测量延迟的分区流行病学模型的安全关键控制
IEEE Control Syst Lett. 2020 Nov 26;5(5):1537-1542. doi: 10.1109/LCSYS.2020.3040948. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
Reframing Optimal Control Problems for Infectious Disease Management in Low-Income Countries.重新构建低收入国家传染病管理的最优控制问题。
Bull Math Biol. 2023 Mar 12;85(4):31. doi: 10.1007/s11538-023-01137-4.
3
Highly coordinated nationwide massive travel restrictions are central to effective mitigation and control of COVID-19 outbreaks in China.

本文引用的文献

1
A compartmental model for the analysis of SARS transmission patterns and outbreak control measures in China.一个用于分析中国SARS传播模式和疫情控制措施的分区模型。
Appl Math Comput. 2005 Mar 15;162(2):909-924. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2003.12.131. Epub 2004 Mar 16.
2
Structural Factors of the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Outbreak as a Public Health Crisis in Korea and Future Response Strategies.中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒疫情作为韩国公共卫生危机的结构因素及未来应对策略
J Prev Med Public Health. 2015 Nov;48(6):265-70. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.15.066. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
3
Measuring the impact of Ebola control measures in Sierra Leone.
高度协调的全国性大规模出行限制措施是中国有效缓解和控制新冠疫情爆发的核心。
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2022 Apr;478(2260):20220040. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2022.0040. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
4
Effects of Vaccination Efficacy on Wealth Distribution in Kinetic Epidemic Models.动态流行病模型中疫苗接种效力对财富分配的影响。
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Jan 29;24(2):216. doi: 10.3390/e24020216.
5
Current forecast of COVID-19 in Mexico: A Bayesian and machine learning approaches.墨西哥 COVID-19 现状预测:贝叶斯和机器学习方法。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):e0259958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259958. eCollection 2022.
6
Highly coordinated nationwide massive travel restrictions are central to effective mitigation and control of COVID-19 outbreaks in China.在中国,高度协调的全国性大规模出行限制措施是有效缓解和控制新冠疫情爆发的核心。
ArXiv. 2022 Jan 7:arXiv:2201.02353v1.
7
Optimal control of the SIR model with constrained policy, with an application to COVID-19.带约束策略的 SIR 模型的最优控制及其在 COVID-19 中的应用。
Math Biosci. 2022 Feb;344:108758. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2021.108758. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
8
Safety-Critical Control of Active Interventions for COVID-19 Mitigation.用于减轻新冠疫情的主动干预措施的安全关键控制
IEEE Access. 2020 Oct 8;8:188454-188474. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3029558. eCollection 2020.
9
Optimal control-based vaccination and testing strategies for COVID-19.基于最优控制的 COVID-19 疫苗接种和检测策略。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Nov;211:106411. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106411. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
10
On the optimal control of SIR model with Erlang-distributed infectious period: isolation strategies.具有爱尔朗分布传染期的 SIR 模型的最优控制:隔离策略。
J Math Biol. 2021 Sep 22;83(4):36. doi: 10.1007/s00285-021-01668-1.
衡量塞拉利昂埃博拉防控措施的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 17;112(46):14366-71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1508814112. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
4
Epidemiological modelling for the assessment of bovine tuberculosis surveillance in the dairy farm network in Emilia-Romagna (Italy).意大利艾米利亚 - 罗马涅大区奶牛场网络中牛结核病监测评估的流行病学建模
Epidemics. 2015 Jun;11:62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2015.02.007. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
5
Avian influenza. Enigmatic bird flu strain races across the U.S. Midwest.禽流感。神秘的禽流感毒株在美国中西部迅速传播。
Science. 2015 May 15;348(6236):741-2. doi: 10.1126/science.348.6236.741.
6
Evaluating vaccination strategies to control foot-and-mouth disease: a model comparison study.评估控制口蹄疫的疫苗接种策略:一项模型比较研究。
Epidemiol Infect. 2015 Apr;143(6):1256-75. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814001927. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
7
React or wait: which optimal culling strategy to control infectious diseases in wildlife.应对还是等待:哪种最佳扑杀策略可用于控制野生动物中的传染病
J Math Biol. 2014 Oct;69(4):1001-25. doi: 10.1007/s00285-013-0726-y. Epub 2013 Sep 22.
8
Unexpected consequences of culling on the eradication of wildlife diseases: the role of virulence evolution.扑杀对野生动物疾病根除的意外后果:毒力进化的作用。
Am Nat. 2013 Mar;181(3):301-13. doi: 10.1086/669154. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
9
Economic analysis of HPAI control in the Netherlands I: epidemiological modelling to support economic analysis.荷兰高致病性禽流感防控的经济分析 I:支持经济分析的流行病学建模
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2014 Jun;61(3):199-216. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12021. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
10
Evaluation of control and surveillance strategies for classical swine fever using a simulation model.应用模拟模型评价猪瘟的控制与监测策略。
Prev Vet Med. 2013 Jan 1;108(1):73-84. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.07.006. Epub 2012 Aug 1.